Kremlin maintains uncertainty over end of energy moratorium with Ukraine

Moscow refuses to specify the expiry date of the Russia-Ukraine energy strike moratorium, despite ongoing tensions and US diplomatic involvement.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

The Kremlin has stated it is not in a position to clarify the end date of the moratorium on strikes targeting Ukrainian energy infrastructure, introduced following negotiations led by the United States. The announcement comes just days before the presumed expiry of the 30-day period declared by Russian President Vladimir…

The Kremlin has stated it is not in a position to clarify the end date of the moratorium on strikes targeting Ukrainian energy infrastructure, introduced following negotiations led by the United States. The announcement comes just days before the presumed expiry of the 30-day period declared by Russian President Vladimir Putin after a call with US President Donald Trump on 18 March.

Following that call, Russia announced the suspension of its airstrikes against Ukrainian energy facilities. Washington confirmed a separate tripartite agreement with Moscow and Kyiv aimed at pausing attacks on energy structures to reduce combat intensity in this strategically vital area. However, no formal start or end date for the moratorium has been made public, and the precise terms of its implementation remain undefined.

A disputed and loosely observed moratorium

Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov, questioned during his daily press briefing, refrained from giving any clear indication of the moratorium’s expiration. “We will keep you informed, but I am not ready to communicate the decision taken,” he stated in the presence of Agence France-Presse (AFP). According to Russian authorities, the moratorium officially began on 18 March for a period of 30 days, though no corresponding confirmation has been issued by Ukrainian officials.

Mutual accusations of breaches of the agreement have become a fixture in official statements from both capitals. On Wednesday, the Russian Ministry of Defence again accused Kyiv of conducting strikes on Russian energy installations, casting further doubt on the agreement’s viability amid a growing climate of mistrust between the two parties.

Escalating violence despite the energy truce

On the ground, airstrikes continue. A missile attack attributed to Russia killed 35 people in the city of Sumy in northeastern Ukraine last Sunday, according to Ukrainian authorities. The strike is among the deadliest incidents of the conflict in recent weeks.

The US diplomatic initiative, led by Donald Trump, initially aimed for an unconditional and comprehensive ceasefire—accepted by Ukraine but rejected by Russia. The continuation of hostilities, despite the declared commitments, underscores the limitations of temporary security measures in the context of prolonged warfare.

The suspension of 1,400 MW of electricity supplied by Iran to Iraq puts pressure on the Iraqi grid, while Tehran records a record 77 GW demand and must balance domestic consumption with regional obligations.
Beijing opposes the possible return of European trio sanctions against Iran, as the nuclear deal deadline approaches and diplomatic tensions rise around Tehran.
Around 80 Russian technical standards for oil and gas have been internationally validated, notably by the United Arab Emirates, Algeria and Oman, according to the Institute of Oil and Gas Technological Initiatives.
Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
The two countries end 37 years of conflict with a 43-kilometer corridor under American control for 99 years. The infrastructure will transport 50 million tons of goods annually by 2030.
A senior official from the UN agency begins technical discussions with Iran on Monday, the first meeting since June strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push BrasĂ­lia toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Consent Preferences