Trump and Maduro: The Energy Struggle Redefining US-Venezuela Relations

As Nicolás Maduro begins a contested third term and Donald Trump prepares to return to the White House, tensions between Washington and Caracas reach a critical point. Between tightened sanctions, strategic alliances, and oil stakes, 2025 is shaping up to be a pivotal year for these two nations.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

Donald Trump’s return to the White House and Nicolás Maduro’s inauguration for a third presidential term symbolize a decisive turning point for US-Venezuela relations. These two controversial figures embody a deep ideological polarization where energy interests and diplomatic tensions intertwine in a battle with stakes that transcend regional borders.

Since 2013, Caracas has been a burning issue in US foreign policy. Between severe sanctions, economic crises, and the pragmatism needed to maintain strategic access to Venezuelan oil, the relationship between the two nations has oscillated between confrontation and interdependence. In 2025, as the Trump administration prepares to tighten sanctions, Venezuela, weakened yet strategic, remains a key player in the global energy landscape.

Maduro: A Term Under International Pressure

On January 10, 2025, Nicolás Maduro began his third presidential term amid widespread contestation. Deemed illegitimate by the US, Canada, the European Union, and the United Kingdom, this inauguration marked a new chapter in a political crisis that has only deepened.

Yet, according to the opposition, Edmundo González Urrutia, who won the July 2024 presidential election with 67% of the vote, should have been inaugurated. However, Maduro took drastic measures to prevent his return: closing airspace and activating national defense systems. This show of force reflects the fragility of his regime, which relies on coercive measures to maintain control.

María Corina Machado, a leading opposition figure, described this situation as a “coup d’état.” Freed after a controversial arrest on January 9, she praised international pressure for her release. “Maduro cannot rule by force over a country that has decided to free itself,” she declared, calling for increased mobilization.

Meanwhile, the US Treasury Department has ramped up sanctions against Maduro’s regime, targeting eight close associates, including Hector Andres Obregon Perez, president of PDVSA. According to S&P Global, these new measures are accompanied by additional restrictions on oil exports, increasing pressure on an already suffocating economy.

Trump: A Return to Maximum Sanctions?

On January 20, 2025, Donald Trump will reclaim the Oval Office. His first term was marked by escalating tensions with Maduro’s regime, notably through the recognition of Juan Guaidó as Venezuela’s legitimate president and the imposition of draconian economic sanctions. His return to power could signal a tougher approach, especially with heightened restrictions on oil exports.

However, before leaving office, the Biden administration maintained specific licenses allowing Chevron and other American companies to continue operating in Venezuela. This measure, though controversial, aims to secure a limited yet strategic flow of Venezuelan oil to the US. During a January 10 press conference, a senior Biden administration official stated: “Depending on developments over the next ten days, we are ready to make recommendations to the incoming administration regarding the future of these licenses.”

This posture illustrates the complexity of the decisions ahead for Trump. While the US seeks to maximize pressure on Maduro, domestic economic interests, including reliance on heavy Venezuelan crude for American refineries, will temper any extreme measures.

Economic and Strategic Stakes

**The Crucial Role of Oil**
With the world’s largest proven oil reserves, Venezuela remains a key player despite the collapse of its oil industry. US sanctions have crippled PDVSA, limiting its production capacity and restricting the country’s access to foreign currency.

Yet mutual dependency persists. American refineries, adapted to process Venezuelan heavy crude, play a crucial role in US energy policy. This interdependence forces Washington to balance strict sanctions with the pragmatism needed to avoid disruptions in global oil markets.

At the same time, the US State Department has intensified efforts to isolate Maduro’s regime. Rewards for information leading to the arrest of Maduro and his allies have been raised to $25 million, sending a strong message aimed at further weakening his power.

Corruption scandals, particularly within PDVSA, continue to undermine investor confidence. In 2024, revelations of massive embezzlement amplified international partners’ mistrust. Structural reforms and increased transparency will be essential for any hope of economic recovery.

Toward a Diplomatic Standoff

Trump’s return and Maduro’s consolidation of power lay the groundwork for a major diplomatic confrontation. If Trump opts for tougher sanctions, Maduro may deepen alliances with players like China and Russia, who already play a crucial role in sustaining his regime.

This dynamic could redefine power balances in Latin America, as Washington seeks to contain Caracas’ influence while preserving its strategic energy interests.

An Uncertain Future for Bilateral Relations

The year 2025 promises to be a pivotal moment for US-Venezuela relations. The decisions made by these two leaders, as polarizing as they are unpredictable, will have major repercussions on regional geopolitics and global energy markets.

Beyond the tensions, oil remains the backbone of this ambivalent relationship. While Trump may intensify pressure, the mutual dependency between the two countries could temper extreme actions and maintain a fragile balance between economic pragmatism and ideological confrontation.

Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Consent Preferences