Sino-Russian trade relations, an “unbalanced” economic marriage?

Since the Russian offensive against Ukraine, Sino-Russian trade relations have been booming, with a record $190 billion in bilateral trade by 2022. However, experts warn of the risks of an unbalanced and weak relationship for Russia.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

Sino-Russian trade relations have been growing since theRussian offensive against Ukraine. Russia having been largely cut off from Europe, to keep its economy alive, the country has massively reoriented its trade relations towards China. Trade between the two countries reached a record $190 billion in 2022, despite international sanctions and the departure of many foreign companies from Russia. On the energy front, Moscow and Beijing have also accelerated their rapprochement. But experts warn of the risks of an unbalanced relationship and a weak position for Russia.

An economic partnership without limits

Before the Kremlin’s intervention in Ukraine, Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping had brandished a “limitless” partnership between Russia and China. The message was clear: to be the counterweight to the West. Since then, trade has exploded, with bilateral trade reaching a record $190 billion in 2022. The share of the yuan in the currencies used for Russian foreign trade has risen in one year from 0.5% to 16%, leading to a dramatic reduction in the share of the euro and the dollar in Russian exports (now 48%).

On the energy front, their main source of trade, Moscow and Beijing have also accelerated their rapprochement. Economists from the Association of Major Global Banks and Financial Institutions (IIF) explain that “China and India have replaced the EU as the main export markets” for Russian oil, accounting “in the fourth quarter (2022), together with Turkey, for two-thirds of total Russian crude exports”.

Sino-Russian trade relations “unbalanced

However, experts warn of the risks of an “unbalanced” relationship and a weak position for Russia. Russia does not have many large economic partners, which makes it critical to turn to China. “The stability of the Russian economy now depends on China, which gives Beijing a new instrument to influence Russia directly,” says Temur Umarov, a specialist in Sino-Russian relations at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. However, the Kremlin contests this observation. “In these relations, there is no leader, no follower,” Vladimir Putin’s diplomatic adviser, Yuri Ushakov, said on Friday, referring to “two partners who trust each other and largely share the same goals.

The logistical and economic challenges of Sino-Russian trade relations

Many logistical challenges remain in further developing this partnership. The railway lines in the Russian Far East “are already saturated”, explains Anna Kireyeva, from the prestigious Moscow school of international relations MGIMO. “And modernizing them will take time.” In addition, the region’s hydrocarbon infrastructure, such as the Russian oil port of Kozmino on the Sea of Japan coast, also requires investment to meet China’s ever-increasing demand.

Economic consequences for Russia

The embargo and the cap on the sale price of Russian oil by the West since last December have had a negative impact on Moscow’s oil revenues. According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), these revenues fell by 42% in February compared to a year earlier, despite the same volume of oil traded. This weakens Russia’s position vis-à-vis China, which may seek to take advantage of this to gain economic benefits.

Moscow’s economic dependence on Beijing

China and Russia are supposed allies, but also competitors, as Timothy Ash reminds us. Beijing could thus seek to exploit Moscow’s weakened position to gain economic advantages. According to Temur Umarov, we are only at the beginning of the process of economic dependence of Moscow on China. However, in the years or decades to come, this economic lever could be transformed into an even more powerful political lever.

Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Consent Preferences