BRICS Launch Their Own Climate Finance Framework and Reject CBAM

BRICS adopt a joint financial framework aimed at supporting emerging economies while criticizing European carbon border tax mechanisms, deemed discriminatory and risky for their strategic trade relations.

Share:

The BRICS nations, comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, have officially adopted a new joint climate finance framework. This mechanism primarily aims to enhance access to financial resources for emerging countries, enabling them to meet international climate requirements. The initiative comes just months ahead of the official launch of the Tropical Forest Protection Fund led by Brazil, scheduled for introduction at the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP30. Within this context, BRICS leaders have also expressed firm opposition to carbon border taxes, known as Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanisms (CBAM).

A Direct Criticism of the European CBAM

CBAM is a measure introduced by the European Union that imposes a tax on imported products from countries lacking an equivalent carbon pricing system. Currently, affected sectors include steel, aluminum, cement, fertilizers, electricity, and hydrogen. Several nations, including the United Kingdom, Norway, and potentially Australia, plan to implement their own similar mechanisms starting from 2027. However, emerging and developing countries criticize these initiatives, emphasizing the economic risks posed to their exports to Europe, a strategic market for their industrial economies.

The BRICS criticism centers on the argument that these unilateral mechanisms might serve as disguised protectionist instruments, restricting their capacity to freely invest in their own energy and industrial transitions. The group emphasized the potential impacts of these taxes on their economies, especially within a global context where access to climate finance remains challenging for many countries. BRICS leaders explicitly denounce these initiatives as contradictory to the principles of fair international trade.

New Climate Financing Mechanisms

As part of their new strategy, BRICS countries have also announced plans to create a dedicated partnership focused on carbon markets, clearly aimed at strengthening the technical and financial capacities of their members. This partnership specifically seeks to foster knowledge exchange and sharing of experiences regarding carbon emissions management and regulation. Eventually, this partnership could pave the way for partial harmonization of national approaches, facilitating internal trade within the group and enhancing their influence in international climate negotiations.

Brazil, which will host COP30 in Belém this coming November, plays a central role in this new dynamic. The establishment of the Tropical Forest Forever Facility, supported by other BRICS members, proposes a financial mechanism based on performance-based payments related to forest conservation outcomes. This fund aims to mobilize long-term financing, directly involving local and indigenous communities in the practical management of funded projects. The Brazilian government views this approach as an instrument to expand sustainable investment opportunities while reinforcing its international diplomatic stance.

A Constantly Evolving Climate Context

This new BRICS framework comes shortly after announcements made during COP29 in Baku, where participating countries agreed to triple climate finance directed toward vulnerable nations. An agreement was also reached regarding the basic rules of a global carbon market. Nevertheless, concern persists among many emerging economies about potential adverse effects of measures like the European CBAM on their future economic development.

At the same time, the global carbon market continues to evolve, with significant disparities in emission permit prices from one region to another. For example, China’s market, which currently primarily covers the energy sector, plans to gradually integrate several major industrial sectors—including steelmaking, petrochemicals, and civil aviation—by the end of the decade. Other emerging economies such as India, Mexico, Argentina, and Indonesia are also working to strengthen their own emissions trading systems, illustrating the growing dynamic of national carbon markets beyond the European Union.

The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Brazil adopts new rules allowing immediate commercial measures to counter the U.S. decision to impose an exceptional 50% customs tariff on all Brazilian exports, threatening stability in bilateral trade valued at billions of dollars.
Several international agencies have echoed warnings by Teresa Ribera, Vice-President of the European Commission, about commercial risks related to Chinese competition, emphasizing the EU's refusal to engage in a price war.
The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development lends €400 million to JSC Energocom to diversify Moldova's gas and electricity supply, historically dependent on Russian imports via Ukraine.
The European Commission is launching an alliance with member states and industrial players to secure the supply of critical chemicals, amid growing competition from the United States and China.
Trade between Russia and Saudi Arabia grew by over 60% in 2024 to surpass USD 3.8 billion, according to Russian Minister of Industry and Trade Anton Alikhanov, who outlined new avenues for industrial cooperation.
Meeting in Rio, BRICS nations urge global energy market stability, openly condemning Western sanctions and tariff mechanisms in a tense economic and geopolitical context.
Despite strong ties, Iran's dependence on oil revenues limits its ability to secure substantial strategic support from Russia and China amid current international and regional crises, according to several experts.
Egypt’s Electricity Minister engages in new talks with Envision Group, Windey, LONGi, China Energy, PowerChina, and ToNGWEI to boost local industry and attract investments in renewable energy.
The potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz places Gulf producers under intense pressure, highlighting their diplomatic and logistical limitations as a blockage threatens 20 million daily barrels of hydrocarbons destined for global markets.
Budapest and Bratislava jointly reject the European Commission's proposal to ban Russian energy supplies, highlighting significant economic risks and a direct threat to their energy security, days ahead of a key meeting.
Libya officially contests Greece's allocation of offshore oil permits, exacerbating regional tensions over disputed maritime areas south of Crete, rich in hydrocarbons and contested by several Mediterranean states.
Hungary, supported by Slovakia, strongly expresses opposition to the European Commission's plan to phase out imports of Russian energy resources, citing major economic and energy impacts for Central Europe.
Israeli military strikes on Iran's Natanz nuclear site destroyed critical electrical infrastructure but did not reach strategic underground facilities, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).