BRICS Launch Their Own Climate Finance Framework and Reject CBAM

BRICS adopt a joint financial framework aimed at supporting emerging economies while criticizing European carbon border tax mechanisms, deemed discriminatory and risky for their strategic trade relations.

Share:

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

Annual subscription

8.25£/month*

*billed annually at 99£/year for the first year then 149,00£/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2£/month*
then 14.90£ per month thereafter

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles offered per month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 35,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

The BRICS nations, comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, have officially adopted a new joint climate finance framework. This mechanism primarily aims to enhance access to financial resources for emerging countries, enabling them to meet international climate requirements. The initiative comes just months ahead of the official launch of the Tropical Forest Protection Fund led by Brazil, scheduled for introduction at the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP30. Within this context, BRICS leaders have also expressed firm opposition to carbon border taxes, known as Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanisms (CBAM).

A Direct Criticism of the European CBAM

CBAM is a measure introduced by the European Union that imposes a tax on imported products from countries lacking an equivalent carbon pricing system. Currently, affected sectors include steel, aluminum, cement, fertilizers, electricity, and hydrogen. Several nations, including the United Kingdom, Norway, and potentially Australia, plan to implement their own similar mechanisms starting from 2027. However, emerging and developing countries criticize these initiatives, emphasizing the economic risks posed to their exports to Europe, a strategic market for their industrial economies.

The BRICS criticism centers on the argument that these unilateral mechanisms might serve as disguised protectionist instruments, restricting their capacity to freely invest in their own energy and industrial transitions. The group emphasized the potential impacts of these taxes on their economies, especially within a global context where access to climate finance remains challenging for many countries. BRICS leaders explicitly denounce these initiatives as contradictory to the principles of fair international trade.

New Climate Financing Mechanisms

As part of their new strategy, BRICS countries have also announced plans to create a dedicated partnership focused on carbon markets, clearly aimed at strengthening the technical and financial capacities of their members. This partnership specifically seeks to foster knowledge exchange and sharing of experiences regarding carbon emissions management and regulation. Eventually, this partnership could pave the way for partial harmonization of national approaches, facilitating internal trade within the group and enhancing their influence in international climate negotiations.

Brazil, which will host COP30 in Belém this coming November, plays a central role in this new dynamic. The establishment of the Tropical Forest Forever Facility, supported by other BRICS members, proposes a financial mechanism based on performance-based payments related to forest conservation outcomes. This fund aims to mobilize long-term financing, directly involving local and indigenous communities in the practical management of funded projects. The Brazilian government views this approach as an instrument to expand sustainable investment opportunities while reinforcing its international diplomatic stance.

A Constantly Evolving Climate Context

This new BRICS framework comes shortly after announcements made during COP29 in Baku, where participating countries agreed to triple climate finance directed toward vulnerable nations. An agreement was also reached regarding the basic rules of a global carbon market. Nevertheless, concern persists among many emerging economies about potential adverse effects of measures like the European CBAM on their future economic development.

At the same time, the global carbon market continues to evolve, with significant disparities in emission permit prices from one region to another. For example, China’s market, which currently primarily covers the energy sector, plans to gradually integrate several major industrial sectors—including steelmaking, petrochemicals, and civil aviation—by the end of the decade. Other emerging economies such as India, Mexico, Argentina, and Indonesia are also working to strengthen their own emissions trading systems, illustrating the growing dynamic of national carbon markets beyond the European Union.

Manila plans to expand gas and renewable energy production to meet a 6.6% increase in electricity demand over the next two years.
Ottawa and London increased bilateral exchanges to structure strategic cooperation on nuclear energy and critical minerals supply chains, as part of Canada’s G7 presidency.
Donald Trump says he secured Narendra Modi’s commitment to end Russian oil imports, adding political pressure to India-Russia trade relations.
Under intense diplomatic pressure from Washington, member states of the International Maritime Organization agreed to postpone by one year the adoption of a carbon pricing mechanism for global maritime transport.
Washington confirms it has mandated the CIA to carry out secret actions against Nicolas Maduro’s government, escalating tensions between the United States and Venezuela amid geostrategic and energy stakes.
Two European Parliament committees propose to advance the full halt of Russian hydrocarbon imports to 2026 and 2027, including oil, gas, and LNG, strengthening the European Union’s geopolitical position.
The COP30 conference hosted in the Amazon by Brazil faces low participation from global leaders, amid geopolitical tensions and major logistical challenges.
The United States has granted Trinidad and Tobago a special licence to resume negotiations with Venezuela on the Dragon gas field, partially lifting restrictions imposed on the Venezuelan energy sector.
Ambassadors of European Union member states have approved the transmission of a legislative proposal to phase out Russian fossil fuel imports by January 2028 to the Council of Ministers.
The State Duma has approved Russia’s formal withdrawal from a treaty signed with the United States on the elimination of military-grade plutonium, ending over two decades of strategic nuclear cooperation.
Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said it was not in Poland’s interest to extradite to Germany a Ukrainian citizen suspected of taking part in the explosions that damaged the Nord Stream gas pipelines in 2022.
Al-Harfi and SCLCO signed agreements with Syrian authorities to develop solar and wind capacity, amid an ongoing energy rapprochement between Riyadh and Damascus.
Faced with risks to Middle Eastern supply chains, Thai and Japanese refiners are turning to US crude, backed by tariff incentives and strategies aligned with ongoing bilateral trade discussions.
France intercepted a tanker linked to Russian exports, prompting Emmanuel Macron to call for a coordinated European response to hinder vessels bypassing oil sanctions.
The activation of the snapback mechanism reinstates all UN sanctions on Iran, directly affecting the defence, financial and maritime trade sectors.
Commissioner Dan Jørgensen visits Greenland to expand energy ties with the European Union, amid plans to double EU funding for the 2028–2034 period.
European and Iranian foreign ministers meet in New York to try to prevent the reinstatement of UN sanctions linked to Tehran’s nuclear programme.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announces a bilateral agreement with Mexico including targeted investments in energy corridors, logistics infrastructure and cross-border security.
The US president has called for an immediate end to Russian oil imports by NATO countries, denouncing a strategic contradiction as sanctions against Moscow are being considered.
Tehran withdrew a resolution denouncing attacks on its nuclear facilities, citing US pressure on IAEA members who feared suspension of Washington’s voluntary contributions.

All the latest energy news, all the time

Annual subscription

8.25£/month*

*billed annually at 99£/year for the first year then 149,00£/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2£/month*
then 14.90£ per month thereafter

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.