BRICS Launch Their Own Climate Finance Framework and Reject CBAM

BRICS adopt a joint financial framework aimed at supporting emerging economies while criticizing European carbon border tax mechanisms, deemed discriminatory and risky for their strategic trade relations.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

The BRICS nations, comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, have officially adopted a new joint climate finance framework. This mechanism primarily aims to enhance access to financial resources for emerging countries, enabling them to meet international climate requirements. The initiative comes just months ahead of the official launch of the Tropical Forest Protection Fund led by Brazil, scheduled for introduction at the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP30. Within this context, BRICS leaders have also expressed firm opposition to carbon border taxes, known as Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanisms (CBAM).

A Direct Criticism of the European CBAM

CBAM is a measure introduced by the European Union that imposes a tax on imported products from countries lacking an equivalent carbon pricing system. Currently, affected sectors include steel, aluminum, cement, fertilizers, electricity, and hydrogen. Several nations, including the United Kingdom, Norway, and potentially Australia, plan to implement their own similar mechanisms starting from 2027. However, emerging and developing countries criticize these initiatives, emphasizing the economic risks posed to their exports to Europe, a strategic market for their industrial economies.

The BRICS criticism centers on the argument that these unilateral mechanisms might serve as disguised protectionist instruments, restricting their capacity to freely invest in their own energy and industrial transitions. The group emphasized the potential impacts of these taxes on their economies, especially within a global context where access to climate finance remains challenging for many countries. BRICS leaders explicitly denounce these initiatives as contradictory to the principles of fair international trade.

New Climate Financing Mechanisms

As part of their new strategy, BRICS countries have also announced plans to create a dedicated partnership focused on carbon markets, clearly aimed at strengthening the technical and financial capacities of their members. This partnership specifically seeks to foster knowledge exchange and sharing of experiences regarding carbon emissions management and regulation. Eventually, this partnership could pave the way for partial harmonization of national approaches, facilitating internal trade within the group and enhancing their influence in international climate negotiations.

Brazil, which will host COP30 in Belém this coming November, plays a central role in this new dynamic. The establishment of the Tropical Forest Forever Facility, supported by other BRICS members, proposes a financial mechanism based on performance-based payments related to forest conservation outcomes. This fund aims to mobilize long-term financing, directly involving local and indigenous communities in the practical management of funded projects. The Brazilian government views this approach as an instrument to expand sustainable investment opportunities while reinforcing its international diplomatic stance.

A Constantly Evolving Climate Context

This new BRICS framework comes shortly after announcements made during COP29 in Baku, where participating countries agreed to triple climate finance directed toward vulnerable nations. An agreement was also reached regarding the basic rules of a global carbon market. Nevertheless, concern persists among many emerging economies about potential adverse effects of measures like the European CBAM on their future economic development.

At the same time, the global carbon market continues to evolve, with significant disparities in emission permit prices from one region to another. For example, China’s market, which currently primarily covers the energy sector, plans to gradually integrate several major industrial sectors—including steelmaking, petrochemicals, and civil aviation—by the end of the decade. Other emerging economies such as India, Mexico, Argentina, and Indonesia are also working to strengthen their own emissions trading systems, illustrating the growing dynamic of national carbon markets beyond the European Union.

Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Consent Preferences