Would Blockchain Solve Global Warming?

Share:

blockchai energy

Gain full professional access to energynews.pro from 4.90$/month.
Designed for decision-makers, with no long-term commitment.

Over 30,000 articles published since 2021.
150 new market analyses every week to decode global energy trends.

Monthly Digital PRO PASS

Immediate Access
4.90$/month*

No commitment – cancel anytime, activation in 2 minutes.

*Special launch offer: 1st month at the indicated price, then 14.90 $/month, no long-term commitment.

Annual Digital PRO Pass

Full Annual Access
99$/year*

To access all of energynews.pro without any limits

*Introductory annual price for year one, automatically renewed at 149.00 $/year from the second year.

Blockchain could be the key to effective tracking of carbon emissions throughout the supply chain. This solution could prove useful in a context of global warming. Energy systems are currently aiming for decarbonization. Promoting transparency will be key to ensuring that entities in the global supply chain comply with the new emissions standards. So the supply chain could have a role to play.

How do you measure a product’s environmental impact?

Take into account all stages of a product’s life cycle

There has been much debate about how to assess whether a product is truly sustainable. But is it enough to look at the emissions of the company that sells it to the end customer?

First, we need to assess a product’s impact at every stage of its life cycle. From the extraction of raw materials to the disposal or recycling process.

This measurement process is known as Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). It’s the calculation and evaluation of the various impacts that a product or project can have on environmental, social and economic aspects.

But after all, what is a product if not the result of all its production stages?

climate blockchain
Digitally tracking carbon emissions throughout the chain can help the energy industry track its emissions footprint.

Blockchain “decomplexes” product tracing

The problem is that tracing all these production stages is difficult in a globalized world. This is because they are usually geographically dispersed, carried out by several different players or entities, often in several different facilities, and using several different technologies.

Globalization has considerably increased the complexity of supply chains. This complexity poses a number of challenges in terms of controlling and monitoring these impacts at every stage of the life cycle. The fact that companies often have a restricted view of their limits is also a factor.

Scope 3 emissions are difficult to measure, but must be taken into account.

The different emissions “scopes

In the context of global warming, analyzing the classification of carbon emissions is relevant. These carbon emissions can be evaluated in three categories, known as scopes:

Scope 1 carbon emissions are the direct result of sources owned or controlled by the company. Scope 2 emissions represent carbon emissions indirectly generated by energy purchased and consumed during production. Finally, scope 3 emissions are indirect emissions throughout the value chain of a product or company. Scope 3 carbon emissions also include the use of a product by the end consumer.

To find out more about scopes and how carbon emissions are classified, read our article on the subject.

The importance of measuring Scope 3 emissions

Scope 3 emissions are the most comprehensive measure of impact. Indeed, the latter can account for up to 75% of a product’s total emissions footprint. But they are also the most difficult to calculate.

Supply chain emissions require a high level of integration and coordination between its multiple networks.

Different entities must share the data needed to certify the sustainability of products and guarantee their traceability. This step is therefore essential. Anything that can be quantified is no longer a risk, but becomes a management issue.

blokchain energy

Traceability and data transparency are essential for monitoring emissions

Data sharing can have two main objectives: transparency and traceability. These terms are often confused, but they imply different objectives.

Improving transparency to get to know the players

Transparency aims to gather high-level information on supply chains. This is achieved by mapping the value chain network in terms of supplier names, facility locations, product attributes and certification.

The main aim of improving transparency is to make it clearer which paths a product follows along supply chains. This makes it possible to gather information on the players involved at every stage.

Improved traceability for better impact measurement

Traceability, on the other hand, requires a higher degree of granularity in the information shared. This information can be, for example, the dates and places of purchase of product components, specific item properties or more operational information.

Increased traceability enables more precise measurement of impacts at every stage of the supply chain. It enables data-driven strategies to be developed and sustainability claims to be verified.

Blockchain can digitally certify carbon emissions footprint

How to track carbon emissions with blockchain

The blockchain’s large distributed ledger can record consumption data from different entities in different locations in real time. We can then calculate the carbon intensity of this consumption.

Finally, we can automatically assign a certificate supplied with the transferred energy. This certificate proves where and when the energy was produced.

Blockchain makes it possible to certify energy emissions

Blockchain can improve the energy system by ensuring trust, traceability and auditability. A digital process called “electricity tokenization” makes this possible. Through this process, units of electricity become digital goods or assets. This enables automatic generation of time-stamped certificates. Transfer and tracking of ownership (based on cryptographic evidence) are also possible.

This process also ensures that certificates are sold only once, and that there is no double counting. Auditors can trace electricity consumed in the supply chain to any stage in its lifecycle.

It’s the only real way to slow global warming throughout the supply chain, and to be totally ecological at all times.

A group of 85 researchers challenges the scientific validity of the climate report released by the US Department of Energy, citing partial methods and the absence of independent peer review.
Five energy infrastructure projects have been added to the list of cross-border renewable projects, making them eligible for financial support under the CEF Energy programme.
The Tanzanian government launches a national consultation to accelerate the rollout of compressed natural gas, mobilising public and private financing to secure energy supply and lower fuel costs.
The Kuwaiti government has invited three international consortia to submit bids for the first phase of the Al Khairan project, combining power generation and desalination.
Nigeria’s state-owned oil company abandons plans to sell the Port Harcourt refinery and confirms a maintenance programme despite high operating costs.
The publication of the Multiannual Energy Programme decree, awaited for two years, is compromised by internal political tensions, jeopardising strategic investments in nuclear and renewables.
The US Energy Information Administration reschedules or cancels several publications, affecting the availability of critical data for oil, gas and renewables markets.
Brazilian authorities have launched a large-scale operation targeting a money laundering system linked to the fuel sector, involving investment funds, fintechs, and more than 1,000 service stations across the country.
A national study by the Davies Group reveals widespread American support for the simultaneous development of both renewable and fossil energy sources, with strong approval for natural gas and solar energy.
The South Korean government compels ten petrochemical groups to cut up to 3.7 million tons of naphtha cracking per year, tying financial and tax support to swift and documented restructuring measures.
The U.S. Department of Energy has extended until November the emergency measures aimed at ensuring the stability of Puerto Rico’s power grid against overload risks and recurring outages.
Under threat of increased U.S. tariffs, New Delhi is accelerating its energy independence strategy to reduce reliance on imports, particularly Russian oil.
With a new $800 million investment agreement, Tsingshan expands the Manhize steel plant and generates an energy demand of more than 500 MW, forcing Zimbabwe to accelerate its electricity strategy.
U.S. electric storage capacity will surge 68% this year according to Cleanview, largely offsetting the slowdown in solar and wind projects under the Trump administration.
A nationwide blackout left Iraq without electricity for several hours, affecting almost the entire country due to record consumption linked to an extreme heatwave.
Washington launches antidumping procedures against three Asian countries. Margins up to 190% identified. Final decisions expected April 2026 with major supply chain impacts.
Revenues generated by oil and gas in Russia recorded a significant decrease in July, putting direct pressure on the country’s budget balance according to official figures.
U.S. electricity consumption reached unprecedented levels in the last week of July, driven by a heatwave and the growth of industrial activity.
The New York Power Authority targets nearly 7GW of capacity with a plan featuring 20 renewable projects and 156 storage initiatives, marking a new phase for public investment in the State.
French Guiana plans to achieve a fully decarbonised power mix by 2027, driven by the construction of a biomass plant and expansion of renewable energy on its territory.

Log in to read this article

You'll also have access to a selection of our best content.

or

Go unlimited with our annual offer: $99 for the 1styear year, then $ 199/year.