Would Blockchain Solve Global Warming?

Share:

blockchai energy

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles offered per month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 35,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

Blockchain could be the key to effective tracking of carbon emissions throughout the supply chain. This solution could prove useful in a context of global warming. Energy systems are currently aiming for decarbonization. Promoting transparency will be key to ensuring that entities in the global supply chain comply with the new emissions standards. So the supply chain could have a role to play.

How do you measure a product’s environmental impact?

Take into account all stages of a product’s life cycle

There has been much debate about how to assess whether a product is truly sustainable. But is it enough to look at the emissions of the company that sells it to the end customer?

First, we need to assess a product’s impact at every stage of its life cycle. From the extraction of raw materials to the disposal or recycling process.

This measurement process is known as Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). It’s the calculation and evaluation of the various impacts that a product or project can have on environmental, social and economic aspects.

But after all, what is a product if not the result of all its production stages?

climate blockchain
Digitally tracking carbon emissions throughout the chain can help the energy industry track its emissions footprint.

Blockchain “decomplexes” product tracing

The problem is that tracing all these production stages is difficult in a globalized world. This is because they are usually geographically dispersed, carried out by several different players or entities, often in several different facilities, and using several different technologies.

Globalization has considerably increased the complexity of supply chains. This complexity poses a number of challenges in terms of controlling and monitoring these impacts at every stage of the life cycle. The fact that companies often have a restricted view of their limits is also a factor.

Scope 3 emissions are difficult to measure, but must be taken into account.

The different emissions “scopes

In the context of global warming, analyzing the classification of carbon emissions is relevant. These carbon emissions can be evaluated in three categories, known as scopes:

Scope 1 carbon emissions are the direct result of sources owned or controlled by the company. Scope 2 emissions represent carbon emissions indirectly generated by energy purchased and consumed during production. Finally, scope 3 emissions are indirect emissions throughout the value chain of a product or company. Scope 3 carbon emissions also include the use of a product by the end consumer.

To find out more about scopes and how carbon emissions are classified, read our article on the subject.

The importance of measuring Scope 3 emissions

Scope 3 emissions are the most comprehensive measure of impact. Indeed, the latter can account for up to 75% of a product’s total emissions footprint. But they are also the most difficult to calculate.

Supply chain emissions require a high level of integration and coordination between its multiple networks.

Different entities must share the data needed to certify the sustainability of products and guarantee their traceability. This step is therefore essential. Anything that can be quantified is no longer a risk, but becomes a management issue.

blokchain energy

Traceability and data transparency are essential for monitoring emissions

Data sharing can have two main objectives: transparency and traceability. These terms are often confused, but they imply different objectives.

Improving transparency to get to know the players

Transparency aims to gather high-level information on supply chains. This is achieved by mapping the value chain network in terms of supplier names, facility locations, product attributes and certification.

The main aim of improving transparency is to make it clearer which paths a product follows along supply chains. This makes it possible to gather information on the players involved at every stage.

Improved traceability for better impact measurement

Traceability, on the other hand, requires a higher degree of granularity in the information shared. This information can be, for example, the dates and places of purchase of product components, specific item properties or more operational information.

Increased traceability enables more precise measurement of impacts at every stage of the supply chain. It enables data-driven strategies to be developed and sustainability claims to be verified.

Blockchain can digitally certify carbon emissions footprint

How to track carbon emissions with blockchain

The blockchain’s large distributed ledger can record consumption data from different entities in different locations in real time. We can then calculate the carbon intensity of this consumption.

Finally, we can automatically assign a certificate supplied with the transferred energy. This certificate proves where and when the energy was produced.

Blockchain makes it possible to certify energy emissions

Blockchain can improve the energy system by ensuring trust, traceability and auditability. A digital process called “electricity tokenization” makes this possible. Through this process, units of electricity become digital goods or assets. This enables automatic generation of time-stamped certificates. Transfer and tracking of ownership (based on cryptographic evidence) are also possible.

This process also ensures that certificates are sold only once, and that there is no double counting. Auditors can trace electricity consumed in the supply chain to any stage in its lifecycle.

It’s the only real way to slow global warming throughout the supply chain, and to be totally ecological at all times.

Amid rising public spending, the French government has tasked two experts with reassessing the support scheme for renewable electricity and storage, with proposals expected within three months.
National operator PSE partners with armed forces to protect transformer stations as critical infrastructure faces sabotage linked to foreign interference.
The Norwegian government establishes a commission to anticipate the decline of hydrocarbons and assess economic options for the country in the coming decades.
Kazakhstan plans to allocate 3 GW of wind and solar projects by the end of 2026 through public tenders, with a first 1 GW tranche in 2025, amid efforts to modernise its power system.
Hurricanes Beryl, Helene and Milton accounted for 80% of electricity outages recorded in 2024, marking a ten-year high according to federal data.
The French Energy Regulatory Commission introduces a temporary prudential control on gas and electricity suppliers through a “guichet à blanc” opening in December, pending the transposition of European rules.
The Carney–Smith agreement launches a new pipeline to Asia, removes oil and gas emission caps, and initiates reform of the Pacific north coast tanker ban.
The gradual exit from CfD contracts is turning stable assets into infrastructures exposed to higher volatility, challenging expected returns and traditional financing models for the renewable sector.
The Canadian government introduces major legislative changes to the Energy Efficiency Act to support its national strategy and adapt to the realities of digital commerce.
Quebec becomes the only Canadian province where a carbon price still applies directly to fuels, as Ottawa eliminated the public-facing carbon tax in April 2025.
New Delhi launches a 72.8 bn INR incentive plan to build a 6,000-tonne domestic capacity for permanent magnets, amid rising Chinese export restrictions on critical components.
The rise of CfDs, PPAs and capacity mechanisms signals a structural shift: markets alone no longer cover 10–30-year financing needs, while spot prices have surged 400% in Europe since 2019.
Germany plans to finalise the €5.8bn ($6.34bn) purchase of a 25.1% stake in TenneT Germany to strengthen its control over critical national power grid infrastructure.
The Ghanaian government is implementing a reform of its energy system focused on increasing the use of local natural gas, aiming to reduce electricity production costs and limit the sector's financial imbalance.
On the 50th anniversary of its independence, Suriname announced a national roadmap including major public investment to develop its offshore oil reserves.
In its latest review, the International Energy Agency warns of structural blockages in South Korea’s electricity market, calling for urgent reforms to close the gap on renewables and reduce dependence on imported fossil fuels.
China's power generation capacity recorded strong growth in October, driven by continued expansion of solar and wind, according to official data from the National Energy Administration.
The 2026–2031 offshore programme proposes opening over one billion acres to oil exploration, triggering a regulatory clash between Washington, coastal states and legal advocacy groups.
The government of Mozambique is consolidating its gas transport and regasification assets under a public vehicle, anchoring the strategic Beira–Rompco corridor to support Rovuma projects and respond to South Africa’s gas dependency.
The British system operator NESO initiates a consultation process to define the methodology of eleven upcoming regional strategic plans aimed at coordinating energy needs across England, Scotland and Wales.

All the latest energy news, all the time

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.