Washington secures access to Ukrainian mineral resources through joint investment fund

The United States and Ukraine have signed a bilateral agreement establishing an investment fund aimed at financing reconstruction and natural resource extraction projects on Ukrainian territory.

Partagez:

The American and Ukrainian governments have formalised the signing of an economic partnership agreement during a ceremony in Washington, creating a joint investment fund. This financial mechanism is designed to support Ukraine’s economic reconstruction and includes direct investments in projects linked to the extraction of mineral, oil and gas resources.

The agreement stipulates that the projects financed through this fund will focus on the development of Ukraine’s extractive sector, without any transfer of ownership. Ukrainian Minister of Economy Ioulia Svyrydenko stated that the Ukrainian state retains full sovereignty over its resources, including subsurface reserves, and that all decisions regarding exploitation will rest solely with national authorities.

A mixed financial structure between Kyiv and Washington

The fund will be jointly managed by representatives from both governments. It is based on equal financial contributions and aims to attract additional capital from public and private international actors. United States Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent emphasised that this agreement directly responds to the substantial financial and military assistance granted to Ukraine since 2022, estimated at several tens of billions of dollars.

This new legal and financial framework enables American investors to operate in strategic sectors of the Ukrainian economy with legal safeguards, though it does not include military protection clauses. The agreement lacks provisions for security guarantees in the event of renewed hostilities or military escalation in affected regions.

Intense negotiations over control of resources

Negotiations leading to the document were marked by disagreements concerning the nature of U.S. involvement. An earlier version of the agreement, proposed in February, was rejected following a public dispute between Presidents Volodymyr Zelensky and Donald Trump. A revised version, deemed more balanced, was eventually accepted after weeks of diplomatic discussions.

The Ukrainian administration insisted that previously allocated assistance should not be recognised as debt. Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal clarified that the agreement excludes earlier military or economic funding from Ukrainian government obligations. This position was accepted by the American side, although it was criticised by some U.S. congressional representatives.

Growing interest in Ukraine’s rare earth reserves

Ukraine is regarded as a territory with strong potential for the extraction of rare earths and critical metals. However, many deposits are located in areas currently under Russian military occupation, making near-term exploitation difficult. The United States has nonetheless expressed long-term strategic interest in these resources, particularly in the context of diversifying supply chains.

President Donald Trump stated that access to these resources represents a form of return on U.S. support. According to the U.S. Treasury, the presence of American stakeholders on the ground would strengthen the country’s economic prospects while serving as a tool of economic leverage within broader peace negotiations.

Security impact and ongoing military context

Shortly after the agreement was signed, the Russian military launched a drone strike on the city of Odessa, killing two civilians and injuring five others. The operation was part of a series of attacks across various regions of the country, including the Sumy, Kharkiv and Donetsk oblasts. These developments highlight the continuing challenges of securing infrastructure required for large-scale economic projects.

The agreement must still be ratified by the Ukrainian parliament before it can enter into force. In the meantime, several economic and diplomatic stakeholders are closely monitoring the fund’s implementation, particularly regarding access conditions to deposits and guarantees offered to foreign investors.

The potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz places Gulf producers under intense pressure, highlighting their diplomatic and logistical limitations as a blockage threatens 20 million daily barrels of hydrocarbons destined for global markets.
Budapest and Bratislava jointly reject the European Commission's proposal to ban Russian energy supplies, highlighting significant economic risks and a direct threat to their energy security, days ahead of a key meeting.
Libya officially contests Greece's allocation of offshore oil permits, exacerbating regional tensions over disputed maritime areas south of Crete, rich in hydrocarbons and contested by several Mediterranean states.
Hungary, supported by Slovakia, strongly expresses opposition to the European Commission's plan to phase out imports of Russian energy resources, citing major economic and energy impacts for Central Europe.
Israeli military strikes on Iran's Natanz nuclear site destroyed critical electrical infrastructure but did not reach strategic underground facilities, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
The French president travels to Nuuk on 15 June to support Greenlandic sovereignty, review energy projects and respond to recent US pressure, according to the Élysée.
Kazakhstan has selected Rosatom and China National Nuclear Corporation to build two nuclear power plants totaling 2.4 GW, a decision following a favorable referendum and coinciding with Xi Jinping’s upcoming strategic visit.
Israeli strikes against Iranian nuclear sites disrupt US-Iranian talks on the nuclear deal. Tehran now considers canceling the upcoming negotiation round in Oman, heightening regional economic concerns.
Facing alarming breaches of uranium enrichment thresholds by Iran and explicit existential threats, Israel launches targeted military strikes against Iranian nuclear infrastructure, escalating regional tensions dramatically.
The Kremlin has confirmed that Vladimir Putin aims to help resolve the nuclear dispute between the United States and Iran, leveraging strengthened strategic ties with Tehran.
President Lee Jae-myung adopts an energy diplomacy rooted in national interest, amid a complex international landscape of rivalries that could create challenging situations for the country and its energy businesses.
Paris and Warsaw held a bilateral workshop in Warsaw to strengthen coordination on electricity infrastructure investments and supply security under the Nancy Treaty.
Donald Trump firmly rejects any uranium enrichment by Iran, while Russia affirms Tehran’s right to civil nuclear power, intensifying tensions in negotiations over the Iranian nuclear program.
Syria has signed a $7bn agreement with a consortium of companies from Qatar, Turkey and the United States to rebuild its national power sector.
Friedrich Merz confirmed that Germany would block any attempt to relaunch the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, despite internal calls suggesting a potential reopening of dialogue with Moscow.
A memorandum of understanding formalises energy cooperation between the European Union and the Latin American Energy Organization, including permanent EU participation in the organisation’s governance bodies.
Prime Minister Viktor Orban announced that Hungary would oppose the EU's plan to ban Russian energy deliveries by 2027, both legally and politically.
Michael Kretschmer, Minister-President of Saxony, proposed restarting dialogue with Russia on the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, despite clear opposition from the German government to any reactivation of the project.
Donald Trump is calling on the United Kingdom to abandon wind energy in favor of revitalizing offshore oil extraction, sparking debate over the economic and political implications of such an energy strategy after their recent trade agreement.
China and Egypt concluded over 30 energy-focused agreements, including electric vehicles, smart grids and storage technologies.