Washington secures access to Ukrainian mineral resources through joint investment fund

The United States and Ukraine have signed a bilateral agreement establishing an investment fund aimed at financing reconstruction and natural resource extraction projects on Ukrainian territory.

Share:

Gain full professional access to energynews.pro from 4.90$/month.
Designed for decision-makers, with no long-term commitment.

Over 30,000 articles published since 2021.
150 new market analyses every week to decode global energy trends.

Monthly Digital PRO PASS

Immediate Access
4.90$/month*

No commitment – cancel anytime, activation in 2 minutes.

*Special launch offer: 1st month at the indicated price, then 14.90 $/month, no long-term commitment.

Annual Digital PRO Pass

Full Annual Access
99$/year*

To access all of energynews.pro without any limits

*Introductory annual price for year one, automatically renewed at 149.00 $/year from the second year.

The American and Ukrainian governments have formalised the signing of an economic partnership agreement during a ceremony in Washington, creating a joint investment fund. This financial mechanism is designed to support Ukraine’s economic reconstruction and includes direct investments in projects linked to the extraction of mineral, oil and gas resources.

The agreement stipulates that the projects financed through this fund will focus on the development of Ukraine’s extractive sector, without any transfer of ownership. Ukrainian Minister of Economy Ioulia Svyrydenko stated that the Ukrainian state retains full sovereignty over its resources, including subsurface reserves, and that all decisions regarding exploitation will rest solely with national authorities.

A mixed financial structure between Kyiv and Washington

The fund will be jointly managed by representatives from both governments. It is based on equal financial contributions and aims to attract additional capital from public and private international actors. United States Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent emphasised that this agreement directly responds to the substantial financial and military assistance granted to Ukraine since 2022, estimated at several tens of billions of dollars.

This new legal and financial framework enables American investors to operate in strategic sectors of the Ukrainian economy with legal safeguards, though it does not include military protection clauses. The agreement lacks provisions for security guarantees in the event of renewed hostilities or military escalation in affected regions.

Intense negotiations over control of resources

Negotiations leading to the document were marked by disagreements concerning the nature of U.S. involvement. An earlier version of the agreement, proposed in February, was rejected following a public dispute between Presidents Volodymyr Zelensky and Donald Trump. A revised version, deemed more balanced, was eventually accepted after weeks of diplomatic discussions.

The Ukrainian administration insisted that previously allocated assistance should not be recognised as debt. Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal clarified that the agreement excludes earlier military or economic funding from Ukrainian government obligations. This position was accepted by the American side, although it was criticised by some U.S. congressional representatives.

Growing interest in Ukraine’s rare earth reserves

Ukraine is regarded as a territory with strong potential for the extraction of rare earths and critical metals. However, many deposits are located in areas currently under Russian military occupation, making near-term exploitation difficult. The United States has nonetheless expressed long-term strategic interest in these resources, particularly in the context of diversifying supply chains.

President Donald Trump stated that access to these resources represents a form of return on U.S. support. According to the U.S. Treasury, the presence of American stakeholders on the ground would strengthen the country’s economic prospects while serving as a tool of economic leverage within broader peace negotiations.

Security impact and ongoing military context

Shortly after the agreement was signed, the Russian military launched a drone strike on the city of Odessa, killing two civilians and injuring five others. The operation was part of a series of attacks across various regions of the country, including the Sumy, Kharkiv and Donetsk oblasts. These developments highlight the continuing challenges of securing infrastructure required for large-scale economic projects.

The agreement must still be ratified by the Ukrainian parliament before it can enter into force. In the meantime, several economic and diplomatic stakeholders are closely monitoring the fund’s implementation, particularly regarding access conditions to deposits and guarantees offered to foreign investors.

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei calls for modernising the oil industry and expanding export markets as Tehran faces the possible reactivation of 2015 nuclear deal sanctions.
The Ukrainian president demanded that Slovakia end its imports of Russian crude, offering an alternative supply solution amid ongoing war and growing diplomatic tensions over the Druzhba pipeline.
The United States cuts tariffs on Japanese imports to 15%, while Tokyo launches a massive investment plan targeting American energy, industry, and agriculture.
Brazil’s Cop 30 presidency aims to leverage the Dubai commitments to mobilise public and private actors despite ongoing deadlock in international negotiations.
During a meeting in Beijing, Vladimir Putin called on Slovakia to suspend its energy deliveries to Ukraine, citing Ukrainian strikes on Russian energy infrastructure as justification.
Vladimir Putin and Robert Fico met in China to address the war in Ukraine, regional security and energy relations between Russia and Slovakia.
Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico plans to meet Vladimir Putin in Beijing before receiving Volodymyr Zelensky in Bratislava, marking a diplomatic shift in his relations with Moscow and Kyiv.
The three European powers activate the UN sanctions mechanism against Iran, increasing pressure on the country's oil exports as Tehran maintains high production despite Western measures.
Iran once again authorises the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect its nuclear sites, following a suspension triggered by a dispute over responsibility for Israeli strikes.
First suspect linked to the Nord Stream pipeline explosions, a Ukrainian citizen challenged by Berlin opposes his judicial transfer from Italy.
Ukrainian drones targeted a nuclear power plant and a Russian oil terminal, increasing pressure on diplomatic talks as Moscow and Kyiv accuse each other of blocking any prospect of negotiation.
A Ukrainian national suspected of coordinating the Nord Stream pipeline sabotage has been apprehended in Italy, reigniting a judicial case with significant geopolitical implications across Europe.
Russia continues hydrocarbon deliveries to India and explores new outlets for liquefied natural gas, amid escalating trade tensions with the United States.
Azerbaijani energy infrastructure targeted in Ukraine raises concerns over the security of gas flows between Baku and Kyiv, just as a new supply agreement has been signed.
The suspension of 1,400 MW of electricity supplied by Iran to Iraq puts pressure on the Iraqi grid, while Tehran records a record 77 GW demand and must balance domestic consumption with regional obligations.
Beijing opposes the possible return of European trio sanctions against Iran, as the nuclear deal deadline approaches and diplomatic tensions rise around Tehran.
The United States plans to collaborate with Pakistan on critical minerals and hydrocarbons, exploring joint ventures and projects in strategic areas such as Balochistan.
Around 80 Russian technical standards for oil and gas have been internationally validated, notably by the United Arab Emirates, Algeria and Oman, according to the Institute of Oil and Gas Technological Initiatives.
Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
The two countries end 37 years of conflict with a 43-kilometer corridor under American control for 99 years. The infrastructure will transport 50 million tons of goods annually by 2030.

Log in to read this article

You'll also have access to a selection of our best content.