Washington ends Iraq’s exemption for purchasing Iranian electricity

The United States has decided not to renew Iraq’s exemption, granted since 2018, allowing Baghdad to import electricity from Iran despite U.S. sanctions. This measure increases pressure on Iraq, whose energy supply largely depends on its neighbour.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

The U.S. Embassy in Iraq has confirmed that Washington has ended the exemption allowing Baghdad to purchase electricity from Iran, a decision that could have consequences for the country’s energy security. The embassy spokeswoman stated that this measure aims to prevent Tehran from benefiting from any economic or financial relief.

Energy dependence under pressure

Since 2018, Iraq had been benefiting from waivers allowing it to import electricity and gas from Iran despite U.S. sanctions on Tehran. These imports account for about one-third of Iraq’s energy needs, as the country struggles to generate sufficient electricity due to decades of conflict and an ageing power grid. Baghdad has regularly faced supply disruptions, with Tehran occasionally halting exports due to unpaid bills or rising domestic demand.

Limited short-term alternatives

Economist Yesar Al-Maleki from Middle East Economic Survey highlighted that Iranian electricity supply has never been entirely reliable and has reached its lowest annual levels over the past three years. With the removal of the U.S. exemption, Iraq may face difficulties in meeting electricity demand, particularly during peak summer consumption periods. To mitigate this shortfall, the country could increase electricity imports from Turkey or rely on independent producers in the Kurdistan region.

Towards a diversification of energy sources

The Iraqi government has announced plans to reduce its energy dependence on Iran and achieve self-sufficiency by 2028. This initiative includes ending gas flaring in oil fields to fuel Iraqi power plants. The U.S. Embassy in Baghdad also highlighted the opportunities this energy transition presents for American companies, stating that their expertise could enhance the efficiency of Iraq’s electricity sector.

A decision with geopolitical implications

While this measure applies only to electricity, Iraqi imports of Iranian gas fall under separate U.S. regulations and have not yet been affected. However, the Iraqi government is preparing for various scenarios, including importing liquefied natural gas via shipments. This U.S. decision comes at a time of heightened tensions between Washington and Tehran, as the United States continues its “maximum pressure” policy aimed at curbing Iranian influence in the Middle East.

The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Brazil adopts new rules allowing immediate commercial measures to counter the U.S. decision to impose an exceptional 50% customs tariff on all Brazilian exports, threatening stability in bilateral trade valued at billions of dollars.
Several international agencies have echoed warnings by Teresa Ribera, Vice-President of the European Commission, about commercial risks related to Chinese competition, emphasizing the EU's refusal to engage in a price war.