Trump Rejects Any Uranium Enrichment by Iran, Moscow Supports Tehran

Donald Trump firmly rejects any uranium enrichment by Iran, while Russia affirms Tehran’s right to civil nuclear power, intensifying tensions in negotiations over the Iranian nuclear program.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

Donald Trump, former U.S. president, categorically ruled out any uranium enrichment under a potential nuclear agreement with Iran. This statement follows revelations by Axios regarding a recent American proposal allowing limited enrichment. The contradiction between this proposal and Trump’s public statements clearly highlights persistent differences in these discussions. Abbas Araghchi, head of Iranian diplomacy, stated Iran would not accept any agreement that restricts its civilian nuclear activities.

Tensions over Uranium Enrichment

At the heart of negotiations, uranium enrichment remains the primary obstacle. Western nations and Israel fear Tehran secretly aims to acquire a military nuclear capability, an assertion strongly denied by Iran. Iranian authorities insist on their right to pursue a civilian nuclear program in accordance with the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), to which the country is a signatory. Iran considers this right non-negotiable and essential for its economic and energy objectives.

The Kremlin took a stance on Tuesday supporting Iran, explicitly defending its right to civilian nuclear energy. Dmitry Peskov, Kremlin spokesman, emphasized that every country has the legitimate right to pursue civilian nuclear programs consistent with international agreements in force. Russia officially supports Iranian claims that Tehran has no intention of developing nuclear weapons. Moscow favors a peaceful resolution to this complex and sensitive diplomatic conflict.

Strategic Alliance between Tehran and Moscow

This stance comes as relations between Russia and Iran have significantly strengthened since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Both countries, subject to significant Western sanctions, strengthened their cooperation by signing a comprehensive strategic partnership in January. This agreement marks another step in diplomatic and economic rapprochement between Moscow and Tehran, reinforcing their alliance in a geopolitical context characterized by opposition to international sanctions imposed by the United States and its allies.

The contradictory statements by the United States and Russia highlight the complexity of the issues surrounding the Iranian nuclear dossier. As Tehran maintains its position, refusing to renounce its right to civilian nuclear energy, the prospect of an agreement remains uncertain. This situation keeps international observers on alert, considering the major economic and geopolitical implications at the global level.

The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Brazil adopts new rules allowing immediate commercial measures to counter the U.S. decision to impose an exceptional 50% customs tariff on all Brazilian exports, threatening stability in bilateral trade valued at billions of dollars.
Several international agencies have echoed warnings by Teresa Ribera, Vice-President of the European Commission, about commercial risks related to Chinese competition, emphasizing the EU's refusal to engage in a price war.
Consent Preferences