Qatar threatens to cut gas to Europe over climate requirements

Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

Qatar has sent official letters to the European Commission and the Belgian government, threatening to cease its liquefied natural gas deliveries to Europe if the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) is not modified. This diplomatic escalation comes as the European Union continues to seek diversification of its energy supplies…

Qatar has sent official letters to the European Commission and the Belgian government, threatening to cease its liquefied natural gas deliveries to Europe if the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) is not modified. This diplomatic escalation comes as the European Union continues to seek diversification of its energy supplies following the drastic reduction in Russian gas imports.

The CSDDD, adopted in 2024, requires companies with annual revenues exceeding $519 million in the EU to meet strict sustainability and corporate behavior criteria. Penalties for non-compliance can reach up to 5% of the company’s total global revenue. More controversial for Qatar, the directive requires companies to adopt a climate transition plan aligned with the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5°C in accordance with the Paris Agreement.

Inflexible position on carbon neutrality

Qatari Energy Minister Saad al-Kaabi, also CEO of QatarEnergy, was categorical in his communication: “Neither the State of Qatar nor QatarEnergy have any plans to achieve net zero in the near future.” This statement contrasts sharply with European climate ambitions and underscores the growing gap between the EU’s decarbonization objectives and the interests of hydrocarbon-exporting countries.

Qatar, which holds the world’s highest per capita CO2 emissions at 42.6 metric tons per person in 2023, considers that the CSDDD infringes on the sovereign right of countries to define their own national contributions to the Paris Agreement goals. In an annex to its letter, Doha explicitly proposes removing the section of the directive concerning climate transition plans, deeming these requirements incompatible with its national energy strategy.

Critical stakes for European energy security

The Qatari threats come at a particularly sensitive time for Europe. In 2024, Qatar represented approximately 10% of the EU’s monthly LNG imports, positioning itself as the third supplier after the United States (46%) and Russia (16%). With the scheduled closure of the Ukrainian corridor at the end of 2024 and the European objective to completely eliminate Russian gas imports by 2027, the potential loss of Qatari supplies would create a significant deficit that would be difficult to fill quickly.

European alternatives remain limited. Algeria, which has three pipelines to the EU with two operating below capacity, could increase its exports but faces its own production constraints. The Trans-Saharan gas pipeline (TSGP) project linking Nigeria to Algeria, initially budgeted at $10 billion, now sees its cost estimated between $20 and $30 billion and remains blocked by major security and financial challenges.

Strategic reorientation toward Asian markets

Qatar has already begun redirecting its exports to Asia, where 25% of its LNG is now destined for China, followed by India (17%) and Pakistan (11%). This pivot reflects not only logistical advantages and reduced transportation costs, but also a less constraining regulatory environment. Asian buyers, traditionally bound by long-term contracts with Qatar, are now seeking more flexible conditions and competitive prices, creating favorable market dynamics for producers.

Paradoxically, while Qatar rejects European carbon neutrality goals, the country is investing in its own energy transition. The 800 MWp Al Kharsaah solar plant, inaugurated in 2022, and the goal of achieving 30% solar energy in the national mix by 2030 demonstrate a domestic diversification strategy. QatarEnergy is also building the world’s largest “blue” ammonia plant, with a capacity of 1.2 million tons annually by 2026, representing a $1 billion investment, positioning the country in the emerging low-carbon fuel market.

Tight schedule for European compliance

The implementation of the CSDDD follows a staggered schedule that will begin in 2027 for the largest European companies. EU companies with more than 5,000 employees and $1.74 billion in global revenue will have to comply by 2027, followed by those with more than 3,000 employees and $1.04 billion in revenue in 2028, then those exceeding 1,000 employees and $519 million in 2029. Non-European companies generating more than $519 million in revenue in the EU will also be subject to these obligations.

Facing pressure from Qatar and other trading partners, the European Commission proposed modifications in February 2025 aimed at simplifying certain requirements of the directive. These changes include postponing its implementation and reducing supply chain controls. Nevertheless, these adjustments have not satisfied Qatar, which maintains its position that the fundamental climate transition requirements remain unacceptable.

The recent trade agreement between the United States and the EU, providing for the purchase of $750 billion in American energy over three years, appears as an attempt to reduce European dependence on other suppliers. However, analysts emphasize the unrealistic nature of this objective, as the EU imported less than $80 billion in American energy in 2024. Achieving the $250 billion annual target would require tripling current imports, a considerable logistical and economic challenge in a context where projections indicate a global LNG oversupply of 6 to 13% by 2030.

The suspension of 1,400 MW of electricity supplied by Iran to Iraq puts pressure on the Iraqi grid, while Tehran records a record 77 GW demand and must balance domestic consumption with regional obligations.
Beijing opposes the possible return of European trio sanctions against Iran, as the nuclear deal deadline approaches and diplomatic tensions rise around Tehran.
The United States plans to collaborate with Pakistan on critical minerals and hydrocarbons, exploring joint ventures and projects in strategic areas such as Balochistan.
Around 80 Russian technical standards for oil and gas have been internationally validated, notably by the United Arab Emirates, Algeria and Oman, according to the Institute of Oil and Gas Technological Initiatives.
Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
The two countries end 37 years of conflict with a 43-kilometer corridor under American control for 99 years. The infrastructure will transport 50 million tons of goods annually by 2030.
A senior official from the UN agency begins technical discussions with Iran on Monday, the first meeting since June strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.

We are making technical adjustments to our item access system.
Temporary display or access problems may occur.
Thank you for your understanding.

Consent Preferences