Iran: Oil Dependence Limits Alliances with Moscow and Beijing

Despite strong ties, Iran's dependence on oil revenues limits its ability to secure substantial strategic support from Russia and China amid current international and regional crises, according to several experts.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

For several decades, Iran has maintained economic and strategic relations with Russia and China, primarily centered around oil transactions and occasional military cooperation. However, the nature of these relationships, heavily focused on sanctioned oil exchanges, currently limits the practical scope of these partnerships. Indeed, although Moscow and Beijing economically benefit from purchasing discounted Iranian oil, neither country is willing to jeopardize its other Middle Eastern relationships by actively defending Iran. This dynamic is particularly evident in the context of recent regional tensions involving Tehran.

Russia’s cautious stance towards Iran

Russia, engaged on multiple international fronts, notably in Eastern Europe, demonstrates marked caution towards Iran. According to Maria Snegovaya from the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), Russia avoids direct involvement in conflicts involving Iran to preserve its good relations with other states in the region, particularly Saudi Arabia and Israel. This strategic restraint is also motivated by economic interests linked to potential increases in oil prices resulting from regional escalation, allowing Moscow to offset losses due to Western sanctions. Russia, heavily dependent on oil revenues to balance its budget, thus navigates carefully through crises affecting Iran.

China: Balancing economic opportunities and strategic restraint

China maintains a similar stance, though its motivations differ slightly. Brian Hart, also an analyst at CSIS, notes that Beijing, while remaining a major trading partner with Iran, does not necessarily oppose moderate weakening of Tehran. Such a scenario could allow China to negotiate better prices for oil imports, a crucial component of its energy strategy. Nonetheless, economically, Iran remains secondary to China compared to Gulf countries, notably Saudi Arabia, with which trade volumes are significantly larger. This situation therefore limits China’s incentives to become more actively involved in regional crises to support Tehran.

North Korea emerges as potential actor in the Iranian equation

Another unpredictable actor that could disrupt this fragile regional balance is North Korea. Victor Cha, head of geopolitical affairs at CSIS, indicates that North Korea could play a significant role in rebuilding Iran’s nuclear program, leveraging its recent rapprochement with Moscow. According to Cha, Russia does not seem actively opposed to such potential collaboration, thereby allowing Pyongyang to act freely. This dynamic could introduce a new variable into the region, further complicating geopolitical and economic balances surrounding Iran.

These various factors highlight the real limitations of Iran’s strategic partnerships, constrained by the divergent economic and geopolitical interests of Moscow, Beijing, and now Pyongyang. A situation that raises questions about the sustainability and effectiveness of these alliances for Tehran in the face of future regional challenges.

Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Consent Preferences