India challenges Chinese $137 billion dam near its border

China defends its $137 billion hydropower dam in Tibet against India’s political and hydrological concerns, as the U.S. steps in on this strategic issue.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

India has raised significant concerns about China’s construction of a monumental hydropower dam on the Yarlung Tsangpo, a transboundary river. Valued at $137 billion, the project holds strategic and economic importance for Beijing but intensifies political tensions with New Delhi and raises concerns for downstream states.

A major political dispute

For India, controlling shared water resources with China is a national security priority. The massive scale of the dam, announced by Beijing as the world’s largest hydropower project, could influence the flow of the Brahmaputra River downstream, impacting agricultural and economic activities in India and Bangladesh.

During a bilateral meeting, India emphasized the need to protect downstream states’ rights. The issue has gained further traction with the involvement of the United States. Jake Sullivan, U.S. National Security Advisor, stated that projects like this could have substantial environmental and climate repercussions, citing similar developments in Southeast Asia.

A dual-purpose project

China justifies the dam as part of its push for clean energy transition and disaster risk management. However, it also fits into a broader geopolitical strategy to tighten its grip on shared natural resources.

Meanwhile, India, a key regional player, has warned against economic risks tied to potential water resource reductions in Arunachal Pradesh. The Indian government remains firm on the need for close monitoring of transboundary hydraulic initiatives.

Economic and energy impacts

The economic implications of this dam extend beyond energy production. Its construction will require massive investments and could impact regional energy costs. Downstream, India and Bangladesh might experience economic disruptions, further complicating trade relations in this already fragile region.

Despite Beijing’s assurances about the project’s ecological sustainability, regional experts warn of unpredictable impacts on the river’s ecosystem and local populations. These concerns may influence investment decisions and international cooperation on similar projects.

Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Consent Preferences