G7: Controversial decision on gas investments

The G7 made a controversial decision to support gas investments, drawing criticism from environmental activists and fueling debate about its impact on global climate goals.

Share:

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

Annual subscription

8.25€/month*

*billed annually at 99€/year for the first year then 149,00€/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2€/month*
then 14.90€ per month thereafter

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles offered per month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 35,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

The Group of Seven(G7) countries recently made a controversial decision regarding their position on gas investments, a decision that has drawn criticism from environmental activists. Despite concerns about the impact on climate goals, G7 leaders viewed support for gas investments as a “temporary” measure to reduce their dependence on Russian energy. However, the decision has sparked a debate about the potential damage it could do to global climate efforts.

Towards a reduction of Russian energy dependence: The G7 supports gas investments

At the G7 climate ministers’ meeting in April, an agreement was reached recognizing that investments in gas could help address market shortfalls caused by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and subsequent disruptions in global energy markets. Despite some disagreements between Japan and the European countries, the ministers agreed on the appropriateness of gas investments in these exceptional circumstances.

Nevertheless, at the recent G7 summit in Hiroshima, Japan, the leaders’ statement changed the language to again include gas investments. It was stated that the acceleration of the reduction of dependence on Russian energy made it necessary to include investments in gas. The leaders highlighted the role that increased supplies of liquefied natural gas(LNG) can play, recognizing the opportunity to invest in the sector to address potential shortages in gas markets resulting from the crisis.

The G7 leaders’ statement described support for gas investments as a temporary measure in response to the urgent need to reduce dependence on Russian energy. However, it did not specify the duration of this temporary measure. The paper stressed that such investments should be aligned with climate goals and integrated with the development of low-carbon and renewable hydrogen.

Criticism and support: G7 divided on gas investments

Defending the G7 position, German government officials argued that investment in gas was needed to reduce dependence on Russian gas and find suitable alternatives. They emphasized the importance of building new gas-fired power plants so that they can run on green hydrogen in the future.

The G7 has committed to a goal of zero net emissions by 2050 and to limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius. German government officials emphasized their commitment to these goals and mentioned that any increase in coal or gas consumption would require a corresponding reduction in CO2 emissions in the future.

Critics say the G7 decision creates a loophole for new fossil gas investments, exploiting the Russian military conflict in Ukraine as an excuse. Max Lawson, head of inequality policy at Oxfam, criticized the G7 for not contributing fairly to the achievement of climate goals and for trying to shift the blame onto others.

The G7’s decision to include support for gas investments in their communication has sparked a heated debate. While some argue that this is a necessary step to reduce dependence on Russian energy, others express concern about its potentially harmful effects on climate goals.

Manila plans to expand gas and renewable energy production to meet a 6.6% increase in electricity demand over the next two years.
Ottawa and London increased bilateral exchanges to structure strategic cooperation on nuclear energy and critical minerals supply chains, as part of Canada’s G7 presidency.
Donald Trump says he secured Narendra Modi’s commitment to end Russian oil imports, adding political pressure to India-Russia trade relations.
Under intense diplomatic pressure from Washington, member states of the International Maritime Organization agreed to postpone by one year the adoption of a carbon pricing mechanism for global maritime transport.
Washington confirms it has mandated the CIA to carry out secret actions against Nicolas Maduro’s government, escalating tensions between the United States and Venezuela amid geostrategic and energy stakes.
Two European Parliament committees propose to advance the full halt of Russian hydrocarbon imports to 2026 and 2027, including oil, gas, and LNG, strengthening the European Union’s geopolitical position.
The COP30 conference hosted in the Amazon by Brazil faces low participation from global leaders, amid geopolitical tensions and major logistical challenges.
The United States has granted Trinidad and Tobago a special licence to resume negotiations with Venezuela on the Dragon gas field, partially lifting restrictions imposed on the Venezuelan energy sector.
Ambassadors of European Union member states have approved the transmission of a legislative proposal to phase out Russian fossil fuel imports by January 2028 to the Council of Ministers.
The State Duma has approved Russia’s formal withdrawal from a treaty signed with the United States on the elimination of military-grade plutonium, ending over two decades of strategic nuclear cooperation.
Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said it was not in Poland’s interest to extradite to Germany a Ukrainian citizen suspected of taking part in the explosions that damaged the Nord Stream gas pipelines in 2022.
Al-Harfi and SCLCO signed agreements with Syrian authorities to develop solar and wind capacity, amid an ongoing energy rapprochement between Riyadh and Damascus.
Faced with risks to Middle Eastern supply chains, Thai and Japanese refiners are turning to US crude, backed by tariff incentives and strategies aligned with ongoing bilateral trade discussions.
France intercepted a tanker linked to Russian exports, prompting Emmanuel Macron to call for a coordinated European response to hinder vessels bypassing oil sanctions.
The activation of the snapback mechanism reinstates all UN sanctions on Iran, directly affecting the defence, financial and maritime trade sectors.
Commissioner Dan Jørgensen visits Greenland to expand energy ties with the European Union, amid plans to double EU funding for the 2028–2034 period.
European and Iranian foreign ministers meet in New York to try to prevent the reinstatement of UN sanctions linked to Tehran’s nuclear programme.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announces a bilateral agreement with Mexico including targeted investments in energy corridors, logistics infrastructure and cross-border security.
The US president has called for an immediate end to Russian oil imports by NATO countries, denouncing a strategic contradiction as sanctions against Moscow are being considered.
Tehran withdrew a resolution denouncing attacks on its nuclear facilities, citing US pressure on IAEA members who feared suspension of Washington’s voluntary contributions.

All the latest energy news, all the time

Annual subscription

8.25€/month*

*billed annually at 99€/year for the first year then 149,00€/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2€/month*
then 14.90€ per month thereafter

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.