G7: Controversial decision on gas investments

The G7 made a controversial decision to support gas investments, drawing criticism from environmental activists and fueling debate about its impact on global climate goals.

Partagez:

The Group of Seven(G7) countries recently made a controversial decision regarding their position on gas investments, a decision that has drawn criticism from environmental activists. Despite concerns about the impact on climate goals, G7 leaders viewed support for gas investments as a “temporary” measure to reduce their dependence on Russian energy. However, the decision has sparked a debate about the potential damage it could do to global climate efforts.

Towards a reduction of Russian energy dependence: The G7 supports gas investments

At the G7 climate ministers’ meeting in April, an agreement was reached recognizing that investments in gas could help address market shortfalls caused by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and subsequent disruptions in global energy markets. Despite some disagreements between Japan and the European countries, the ministers agreed on the appropriateness of gas investments in these exceptional circumstances.

Nevertheless, at the recent G7 summit in Hiroshima, Japan, the leaders’ statement changed the language to again include gas investments. It was stated that the acceleration of the reduction of dependence on Russian energy made it necessary to include investments in gas. The leaders highlighted the role that increased supplies of liquefied natural gas(LNG) can play, recognizing the opportunity to invest in the sector to address potential shortages in gas markets resulting from the crisis.

The G7 leaders’ statement described support for gas investments as a temporary measure in response to the urgent need to reduce dependence on Russian energy. However, it did not specify the duration of this temporary measure. The paper stressed that such investments should be aligned with climate goals and integrated with the development of low-carbon and renewable hydrogen.

Criticism and support: G7 divided on gas investments

Defending the G7 position, German government officials argued that investment in gas was needed to reduce dependence on Russian gas and find suitable alternatives. They emphasized the importance of building new gas-fired power plants so that they can run on green hydrogen in the future.

The G7 has committed to a goal of zero net emissions by 2050 and to limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius. German government officials emphasized their commitment to these goals and mentioned that any increase in coal or gas consumption would require a corresponding reduction in CO2 emissions in the future.

Critics say the G7 decision creates a loophole for new fossil gas investments, exploiting the Russian military conflict in Ukraine as an excuse. Max Lawson, head of inequality policy at Oxfam, criticized the G7 for not contributing fairly to the achievement of climate goals and for trying to shift the blame onto others.

The G7’s decision to include support for gas investments in their communication has sparked a heated debate. While some argue that this is a necessary step to reduce dependence on Russian energy, others express concern about its potentially harmful effects on climate goals.

Budapest and Bratislava jointly reject the European Commission's proposal to ban Russian energy supplies, highlighting significant economic risks and a direct threat to their energy security, days ahead of a key meeting.
Libya officially contests Greece's allocation of offshore oil permits, exacerbating regional tensions over disputed maritime areas south of Crete, rich in hydrocarbons and contested by several Mediterranean states.
Hungary, supported by Slovakia, strongly expresses opposition to the European Commission's plan to phase out imports of Russian energy resources, citing major economic and energy impacts for Central Europe.
Israeli military strikes on Iran's Natanz nuclear site destroyed critical electrical infrastructure but did not reach strategic underground facilities, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
The French president travels to Nuuk on 15 June to support Greenlandic sovereignty, review energy projects and respond to recent US pressure, according to the Élysée.
Kazakhstan has selected Rosatom and China National Nuclear Corporation to build two nuclear power plants totaling 2.4 GW, a decision following a favorable referendum and coinciding with Xi Jinping’s upcoming strategic visit.
Israeli strikes against Iranian nuclear sites disrupt US-Iranian talks on the nuclear deal. Tehran now considers canceling the upcoming negotiation round in Oman, heightening regional economic concerns.
Facing alarming breaches of uranium enrichment thresholds by Iran and explicit existential threats, Israel launches targeted military strikes against Iranian nuclear infrastructure, escalating regional tensions dramatically.
The Kremlin has confirmed that Vladimir Putin aims to help resolve the nuclear dispute between the United States and Iran, leveraging strengthened strategic ties with Tehran.
President Lee Jae-myung adopts an energy diplomacy rooted in national interest, amid a complex international landscape of rivalries that could create challenging situations for the country and its energy businesses.
Paris and Warsaw held a bilateral workshop in Warsaw to strengthen coordination on electricity infrastructure investments and supply security under the Nancy Treaty.
Donald Trump firmly rejects any uranium enrichment by Iran, while Russia affirms Tehran’s right to civil nuclear power, intensifying tensions in negotiations over the Iranian nuclear program.
Syria has signed a $7bn agreement with a consortium of companies from Qatar, Turkey and the United States to rebuild its national power sector.
Friedrich Merz confirmed that Germany would block any attempt to relaunch the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, despite internal calls suggesting a potential reopening of dialogue with Moscow.
A memorandum of understanding formalises energy cooperation between the European Union and the Latin American Energy Organization, including permanent EU participation in the organisation’s governance bodies.
Prime Minister Viktor Orban announced that Hungary would oppose the EU's plan to ban Russian energy deliveries by 2027, both legally and politically.
Michael Kretschmer, Minister-President of Saxony, proposed restarting dialogue with Russia on the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, despite clear opposition from the German government to any reactivation of the project.
Donald Trump is calling on the United Kingdom to abandon wind energy in favor of revitalizing offshore oil extraction, sparking debate over the economic and political implications of such an energy strategy after their recent trade agreement.
China and Egypt concluded over 30 energy-focused agreements, including electric vehicles, smart grids and storage technologies.
Facing Russian dominance in the Akkuyu nuclear project, Turkey accelerates international negotiations, aiming to mitigate risks related to energy dependency and potential strategic conflicts of interest.