G7: Controversial decision on gas investments

The G7 made a controversial decision to support gas investments, drawing criticism from environmental activists and fueling debate about its impact on global climate goals.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

The Group of Seven(G7) countries recently made a controversial decision regarding their position on gas investments, a decision that has drawn criticism from environmental activists. Despite concerns about the impact on climate goals, G7 leaders viewed support for gas investments as a “temporary” measure to reduce their dependence on Russian energy. However, the decision has sparked a debate about the potential damage it could do to global climate efforts.

Towards a reduction of Russian energy dependence: The G7 supports gas investments

At the G7 climate ministers’ meeting in April, an agreement was reached recognizing that investments in gas could help address market shortfalls caused by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and subsequent disruptions in global energy markets. Despite some disagreements between Japan and the European countries, the ministers agreed on the appropriateness of gas investments in these exceptional circumstances.

Nevertheless, at the recent G7 summit in Hiroshima, Japan, the leaders’ statement changed the language to again include gas investments. It was stated that the acceleration of the reduction of dependence on Russian energy made it necessary to include investments in gas. The leaders highlighted the role that increased supplies of liquefied natural gas(LNG) can play, recognizing the opportunity to invest in the sector to address potential shortages in gas markets resulting from the crisis.

The G7 leaders’ statement described support for gas investments as a temporary measure in response to the urgent need to reduce dependence on Russian energy. However, it did not specify the duration of this temporary measure. The paper stressed that such investments should be aligned with climate goals and integrated with the development of low-carbon and renewable hydrogen.

Criticism and support: G7 divided on gas investments

Defending the G7 position, German government officials argued that investment in gas was needed to reduce dependence on Russian gas and find suitable alternatives. They emphasized the importance of building new gas-fired power plants so that they can run on green hydrogen in the future.

The G7 has committed to a goal of zero net emissions by 2050 and to limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius. German government officials emphasized their commitment to these goals and mentioned that any increase in coal or gas consumption would require a corresponding reduction in CO2 emissions in the future.

Critics say the G7 decision creates a loophole for new fossil gas investments, exploiting the Russian military conflict in Ukraine as an excuse. Max Lawson, head of inequality policy at Oxfam, criticized the G7 for not contributing fairly to the achievement of climate goals and for trying to shift the blame onto others.

The G7’s decision to include support for gas investments in their communication has sparked a heated debate. While some argue that this is a necessary step to reduce dependence on Russian energy, others express concern about its potentially harmful effects on climate goals.

Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Consent Preferences