COP29: Azerbaijan Pushes for Rapid Agreement on International Carbon Market

At COP29, Azerbaijan urges negotiators to swiftly adopt Article 6 rules, a critical issue for international carbon credit markets. Talks are intensifying in Baku, but obstacles remain.

Share:

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles offered per month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 35,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

The United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP29), held this year in Azerbaijan, focuses on finalizing the rules governing Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. This article is essential for international carbon credit trading, enabling companies and states to offset their emissions by financing emission reductions in other countries. The Azerbaijani presidency, seeking an early success in the first days of the conference, has insisted on the rapid adoption of guidelines for Article 6.4, the UN-led market mechanism under development.

A draft decision was released on November 11, setting standards for project methodologies and carbon removal mechanisms, a step considered significant by market observers. However, disagreements persist among participating countries. “The presidency wants it approved today, and most parties agree, but a few countries still resist,” explained a source close to the Article 6.4 negotiations.

Article 6: The Stakes of International Carbon Credit Trading

Article 6 of the Paris Agreement aims to establish a global framework for emission reduction through commercial exchanges, subdivided into two main mechanisms: Article 6.2, which allows bilateral transactions between states, and Article 6.4, a multilateral market supervised by the UN. Over the past three years, discussions around Article 6.4 have progressed slowly, hampered by concerns over environmental integrity and the robustness of project methodologies.

Recent advances on Article 6.4 have, however, spurred cautious optimism. In October, a committee overseeing this article approved standards for project methodologies, paving the way for the market to become operational. The International Emissions Trading Association (IETA) has urged negotiators to avoid further politicizing the process and to proceed swiftly with adopting these standards. This progress could limit the risks of technical blockages, the IETA notes, while acknowledging that tensions persist over the governance of the mechanism.

Article 6.4: A Carbon Market with Global Implications

Article 6.4 proposes a framework by which companies in one country can reduce their emissions locally and sell these carbon reductions to companies in other countries. This mechanism is seen as a strategic tool for nations and companies aiming to contribute to global emission reductions while benefiting from financial incentives. However, uncertainties remain regarding project approval criteria and methodology, particularly regarding carbon removal and verification of emission reductions.

Negotiations to activate this market have become increasingly delicate, with debates focusing on the validity of carbon removal methodologies and project transparency. The implementation of Article 6.4 could drive new demand for carbon credits, though sector actors remain divided over governance rules and assurances to investors.

Article 6.2: State Sovereignty vs. Investor Risks

Article 6.2 also presents sticking points, notably regarding the authorization and revocation of carbon credits. According to this article, states can authorize projects that allow the international transfer of mitigation outcomes (ITMOs, for Internationally Transferred Mitigation Outcomes), thus offering a bilateral framework for carbon credit exchanges. However, disagreements persist over the possibility for states to cancel these authorizations, a sensitive issue for investors.

Representatives from countries like Japan and Singapore, major buyers of carbon credits, express concerns over the lack of guarantees in case of potential cancellations, which pose political risks for businesses. IETA points out that parties are divided between those prioritizing national sovereignty and those calling for stricter rules to ensure investment security and environmental project integrity.

Growing Cooperation Among States on Carbon Projects

Despite uncertainties, many countries are showing increased interest in cooperation on carbon projects, as evidenced by the growing number of letters of authorization submitted under Article 6. Demand for Article 6.2 carbon credits is gradually increasing, driven by the enthusiasm of developing countries for this trading mechanism. However, the success of these projects will depend on the outcome of the ongoing discussions at COP29, with stakeholders hoping for swift rule clarification to foster a stable and attractive deployment for investors.

Ottawa and London increased bilateral exchanges to structure strategic cooperation on nuclear energy and critical minerals supply chains, as part of Canada’s G7 presidency.
Donald Trump says he secured Narendra Modi’s commitment to end Russian oil imports, adding political pressure to India-Russia trade relations.
Under intense diplomatic pressure from Washington, member states of the International Maritime Organization agreed to postpone by one year the adoption of a carbon pricing mechanism for global maritime transport.
Washington confirms it has mandated the CIA to carry out secret actions against Nicolas Maduro’s government, escalating tensions between the United States and Venezuela amid geostrategic and energy stakes.
Two European Parliament committees propose to advance the full halt of Russian hydrocarbon imports to 2026 and 2027, including oil, gas, and LNG, strengthening the European Union’s geopolitical position.
The COP30 conference hosted in the Amazon by Brazil faces low participation from global leaders, amid geopolitical tensions and major logistical challenges.
The United States has granted Trinidad and Tobago a special licence to resume negotiations with Venezuela on the Dragon gas field, partially lifting restrictions imposed on the Venezuelan energy sector.
Ambassadors of European Union member states have approved the transmission of a legislative proposal to phase out Russian fossil fuel imports by January 2028 to the Council of Ministers.
The State Duma has approved Russia’s formal withdrawal from a treaty signed with the United States on the elimination of military-grade plutonium, ending over two decades of strategic nuclear cooperation.
Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said it was not in Poland’s interest to extradite to Germany a Ukrainian citizen suspected of taking part in the explosions that damaged the Nord Stream gas pipelines in 2022.
Al-Harfi and SCLCO signed agreements with Syrian authorities to develop solar and wind capacity, amid an ongoing energy rapprochement between Riyadh and Damascus.
Faced with risks to Middle Eastern supply chains, Thai and Japanese refiners are turning to US crude, backed by tariff incentives and strategies aligned with ongoing bilateral trade discussions.
France intercepted a tanker linked to Russian exports, prompting Emmanuel Macron to call for a coordinated European response to hinder vessels bypassing oil sanctions.
The activation of the snapback mechanism reinstates all UN sanctions on Iran, directly affecting the defence, financial and maritime trade sectors.
Commissioner Dan Jørgensen visits Greenland to expand energy ties with the European Union, amid plans to double EU funding for the 2028–2034 period.
European and Iranian foreign ministers meet in New York to try to prevent the reinstatement of UN sanctions linked to Tehran’s nuclear programme.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announces a bilateral agreement with Mexico including targeted investments in energy corridors, logistics infrastructure and cross-border security.
The US president has called for an immediate end to Russian oil imports by NATO countries, denouncing a strategic contradiction as sanctions against Moscow are being considered.
Tehran withdrew a resolution denouncing attacks on its nuclear facilities, citing US pressure on IAEA members who feared suspension of Washington’s voluntary contributions.
Poland’s energy minister calls on European Union member states to collectively commit to halting Russian oil purchases within two years, citing increasing geopolitical risks.

All the latest energy news, all the time

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.