Bangladesh reviews its energy projects after the Indian U-turn

Summit Group, a key player in the Bangladeshi energy sector, is reassessing its plans to import renewable energy following a regulatory amendment in India, upsetting cross-border investment forecasts.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

Summit Group, leader in Bangladesh’s energy sector, is adjusting its plans to import renewable energy following a recent regulatory change in India.
This change now allows Indian producers, initially obliged to export their production, to redirect it to the local market.
This development disrupts the agreements established between Summit and its Indian partners, notably Tata Power Renewable Energy Ltd, and forces the group to reassess its investments in the transmission infrastructure needed to import energy into Bangladesh.

Cross-border investment review

This situation is creating uncertainty for Summit, which had planned to import up to 1,000 MW of renewable energy to reduce its dependence on fossil fuels.
Faced with these new contingencies, Summit Power International, the Group’s Singapore subsidiary, is examining the possibility of postponing certain investments pending more precise political and regulatory clarifications.
Recent political tensions in Bangladesh, exacerbated by the hasty departure of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, add to the complexity of these projects.

Impact on regional projects

The changes to India’s export regulations have had an immediate impact on Summit’s regional ambitions.
The group was planning massive investments in hydroelectric projects in Bhutan and Nepal, worth a total of $3 billion.
These projects were intended to diversify Bangladesh’s electricity supply sources, but new economic and regulatory uncertainties are jeopardizing these initiatives.

Strategic adaptation in the face of uncertainty

In this context, Summit must adapt its strategy to minimize the risks associated with these cross-border projects.
Aziz Khan, President of Summit Group, points out that the volatility of national and regional policies could generate additional costs, compromise the profitability of investments and delay their implementation.
As a result, the company is exploring options to secure its energy projects while maintaining a focus on the domestic market, where demand remains strong.
Summit continues to closely monitor political developments in the region, while seeking to capitalize on more stable investment opportunities in Bangladesh.
This pragmatic approach could enable the Group to navigate an ever-changing environment while meeting the country’s growing energy needs.

A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Brazil adopts new rules allowing immediate commercial measures to counter the U.S. decision to impose an exceptional 50% customs tariff on all Brazilian exports, threatening stability in bilateral trade valued at billions of dollars.
Consent Preferences