Russian Strikes Threaten Gas Cooperation Between Azerbaijan and Ukraine

Azerbaijani energy infrastructure targeted in Ukraine raises concerns over the security of gas flows between Baku and Kyiv, just as a new supply agreement has been signed.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

The security of Azerbaijani gas deliveries to Ukraine is once again at the forefront, following several strikes attributed to Russia on energy transit infrastructure. The agreement signed at the end of July 2025 between SOCAR Energy Ukraine, a subsidiary of the State Oil Company of the Azerbaijan Republic (SOCAR), and the Ukrainian group Naftogaz may be tested if these attacks continue.

During the night of August 7 to 8, a strike targeted an oil depot operated by SOCAR and a compression station used to import liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the Odessa region. These facilities are directly involved in the logistics enabling the flow of Azerbaijani gas to Ukrainian territory via the Trans-Balkan corridor, which connects Azerbaijan to Central Europe through Bulgaria and Romania.

Unprecedented Gas Deal via the Trans-Balkan Corridor

On July 28, 2025, Naftogaz concluded its first gas import contract with SOCAR Energy Ukraine, marking the beginning of an unprecedented energy flow between the two countries. This delivery, described as a test by both parties, represents a strategic effort to diversify Kyiv’s natural gas supply sources, following its complete disengagement from Russian gas since 2015.

The volumes delivered remain limited at this stage, but the Ukrainian government emphasized the geopolitical importance of this new opening. Ukraine’s Ministry of Energy stated that the agreement resulted directly from diplomatic efforts led by Minister Svitlana Hrynchuk during her visit to Baku earlier this month. According to ministry officials, the cooperation is expected to strengthen as the winter season approaches.

Growing Risks to Transit Infrastructure

The escalation of Russian strikes on Azerbaijani energy assets in Ukraine poses a direct threat to the viability of this gas corridor. At the end of June, the Orlivka gas distribution station—a key point of the Trans-Balkan pipeline—was already damaged. These events raise questions about the continuity of logistical operations and the protection of energy infrastructure investments in the region.

Tensions were further underscored during a phone call on August 10 between Presidents Ilham Aliyev and Volodymyr Zelenskyy, during which both leaders expressed their opposition to the targeting of energy flows. Despite these attacks, both heads of state affirmed their commitment to maintaining cooperation in the gas sector.

Geopolitical Repercussions and Baku’s Response

In this context, the pro-government media outlet Caliber.Az reported that Baku could consider lifting its arms embargo on Ukraine if Russian strikes on its energy infrastructure persist. Although this information has not been officially confirmed by Azerbaijani authorities, it reflects a progressive deterioration in relations with Moscow.

This potential shift in posture fits into a broader framework of diplomatic realignment. The withdrawal of Russian peacekeepers from Nagorno-Karabakh in 2024, Azerbaijani accusations against Russia following an aviation incident in December of that same year, and allegations of cyberattacks in early 2025 have all contributed to the weakening of bilateral ties.

Restructuring of Regional Energy Flows

Azerbaijan’s traditional energy alignment with Russia appears to be evolving amid a broader redefinition of alliances and transit routes. The gas agreement with Ukraine—although limited in scale—symbolizes a step toward integrating Azerbaijani gas into Eastern European markets independent of Russian influence.

Moscow’s lack of military response to Baku’s recent strategic decisions, and the diversification of export routes—particularly via the Black Sea and European infrastructure—demonstrate a growing intent to secure energy independence in an unstable geopolitical environment. The continuity or disruption of these flows will largely depend on the evolution of the conflict and the effective protection of infrastructure on Ukrainian territory.

Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Consent Preferences