Turkey faces Russian control over its nuclear future at Akkuyu

Facing Russian dominance in the Akkuyu nuclear project, Turkey accelerates international negotiations, aiming to mitigate risks related to energy dependency and potential strategic conflicts of interest.

Share:

The Akkuyu nuclear project, led by the Russian giant Rosatom, raises significant economic, technical, and security concerns in Turkey. Valued at USD 25 billion, this critical project for Turkey’s energy policy is currently 99% controlled by Rosatom through its subsidiary Akkuyu Nükleer A.Ş. The Turkish Parliament recently expressed serious concerns about the economic implications of the agreement signed with Russia, which guarantees a high price of 12.35 US cents per kilowatt-hour for 15 years, significantly higher than domestic and international rates. This situation, coupled with Russian shareholder dominance, fuels questions about potential conflicts of interest undermining Turkish national interests.

Debates on security and technological dependence

In addition to financial costs, Turkish MPs highlighted project delays, notably related to difficulties with Siemens, the German company originally responsible for supplying essential equipment. Facing these delays, Rosatom has turned to Chinese alternatives, raising further questions about Turkey’s technological independence. Limited local participation, estimated between only 25 to 30% of contracts, reinforces concerns over long-term technical dependence on foreign expertise, primarily Russian and Chinese. Since 2011, 319 Turkish engineers have been trained in Russia, placing Turkey in a long-term technological dependence on Russian methods and standards.

Environmental and security concerns were also raised by parliamentarians. Mehmet Tahtasız emphasized the lack of local infrastructure suited to the long-term management of radioactive waste generated by Akkuyu. Furthermore, Mahmut Tanal demanded guarantees concerning seismic assessments and emergency measures, noting that Akkuyu is situated in a highly earthquake-prone area. These factors heighten risks associated with foreign management of such sensitive infrastructure.

Partner diversification strategy

Facing Russian influence, Ankara has embarked on active energy diplomacy for its future nuclear plants, notably in Sinop on the Black Sea coast, and Thrace. According to Turkish Energy Minister Alparslan Bayraktar, advanced negotiations are currently ongoing with Canada through Candu Energy, as well as with China and South Korea. Turkey aims to reach 20 gigawatts (GW) of nuclear capacity by 2050, necessitating rapid partner diversification to prevent scenarios similar to Akkuyu.

Discussions with China are particularly advanced for the project in Thrace, notably with the State Power Investment Cooperation (SPIC). Bayraktar also met with representatives from CNOS and CATL to explore various nuclear investment models and technologies. This diversification appears crucial in a context dominated by Russian influence over the Akkuyu project.

Unexploited legal levers

Despite these new initiatives, Turkey has yet to invoke Article 5 of the bilateral agreement signed with Russia in 2010, which would allow it to reclaim up to 49% of Akkuyu’s shares for national security reasons. Until now, Ankara considers Akkuyu a national commercial entity subject to Turkish law but has not exercised its participation rights. This status quo effectively maintains Russian control over a facility destined to provide 10% of the country’s electricity.

For stakeholders in the energy sector, the current Akkuyu situation and future strategic decisions by the Turkish government will be crucial. Upcoming developments, especially Akkuyu’s planned operational start at the end of 2025, and progress in negotiations with new partners, will determine the real extent of foreign influence over Turkey’s nuclear sector.

The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Brazil adopts new rules allowing immediate commercial measures to counter the U.S. decision to impose an exceptional 50% customs tariff on all Brazilian exports, threatening stability in bilateral trade valued at billions of dollars.
Several international agencies have echoed warnings by Teresa Ribera, Vice-President of the European Commission, about commercial risks related to Chinese competition, emphasizing the EU's refusal to engage in a price war.
The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development lends €400 million to JSC Energocom to diversify Moldova's gas and electricity supply, historically dependent on Russian imports via Ukraine.
BRICS adopt a joint financial framework aimed at supporting emerging economies while criticizing European carbon border tax mechanisms, deemed discriminatory and risky for their strategic trade relations.
The European Commission is launching an alliance with member states and industrial players to secure the supply of critical chemicals, amid growing competition from the United States and China.
Trade between Russia and Saudi Arabia grew by over 60% in 2024 to surpass USD 3.8 billion, according to Russian Minister of Industry and Trade Anton Alikhanov, who outlined new avenues for industrial cooperation.
Meeting in Rio, BRICS nations urge global energy market stability, openly condemning Western sanctions and tariff mechanisms in a tense economic and geopolitical context.
Despite strong ties, Iran's dependence on oil revenues limits its ability to secure substantial strategic support from Russia and China amid current international and regional crises, according to several experts.
Egypt’s Electricity Minister engages in new talks with Envision Group, Windey, LONGi, China Energy, PowerChina, and ToNGWEI to boost local industry and attract investments in renewable energy.
The potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz places Gulf producers under intense pressure, highlighting their diplomatic and logistical limitations as a blockage threatens 20 million daily barrels of hydrocarbons destined for global markets.
Budapest and Bratislava jointly reject the European Commission's proposal to ban Russian energy supplies, highlighting significant economic risks and a direct threat to their energy security, days ahead of a key meeting.
Libya officially contests Greece's allocation of offshore oil permits, exacerbating regional tensions over disputed maritime areas south of Crete, rich in hydrocarbons and contested by several Mediterranean states.