UK steps up pressure on Russian “Ghost Fleet

London imposes new sanctions on ten Russian vessels operating under flags of convenience to circumvent Western oil restrictions, intensifying economic pressure on Moscow.

Share:

Illustration flotte fantôme russe

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

The UK has announced a tightening of sanctions against a series of Russian vessels operating under foreign flags.
These ships, dubbed the “phantom fleet”, are used to transport oil and circumvent restrictions imposed by G7 countries and their allies since the invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
According to the UK Foreign Office, these sanctions prohibit ten of these vessels from accessing British ports and registering in the UK shipping register.
Previous sanctions having failed to deter Moscow from using these methods, London is stepping up its efforts to cut off access to world energy markets, the keystone of Russian state financing.
Oil exports will account for around 25% of Russia’s budget in 2023, and these new measures are designed to further restrict this vital source of revenue.

Leverage effect on Russian oil trade

The announcement comes at the same time as talks between British Foreign Secretary David Lammy and US Secretary of State Antony Blinken in Ukraine.
The aim of these meetings is to coordinate a coherent Western response to Russian bypass strategies.
The aim is to tighten the regulatory net around Russian oil exports and discourage the use of uninsured or flag-of-convenience vessels.
The new restrictions imposed by London mark the third round of measures against such vessels.
Three of the ten ships targeted have been identified as having carried over $5 billion worth of Russian oil since the start of the conflict.
The British government accuses these ships of allowing Moscow to continue its unrestricted oil sales, thereby helping to finance military operations in Ukraine.

Consequences for Russian Energy Markets and Strategies

The repercussions of sanctions on world energy markets could be significant.
By restricting Russia’s ability to export oil, London and its allies seek to influence not only trade flows, but also oil prices on world markets.
Although the immediate effects may be limited by Russia’s efforts to diversify its trade routes and partners, these actions create increased uncertainty for players in the energy sector.
In response, Moscow may redouble its efforts to forge alliances with non-aligned countries, or seek to circumvent sanctions through barter mechanisms or trade in local currencies.
Maritime operators, as well as insurers and reinsurers in the sector, could also face increased compliance and political risk challenges.

Implications for Western Energy Policies

These new measures are part of a wider strategy by the G7 countries to limit Russia’s energy revenues while minimizing disruption to their own economies.
The coordination between London and Washington, symbolized by the joint visit of Lammy and Blinken to Ukraine, shows a clear desire to maintain continuous pressure on Moscow.
British sanctions add a new layer of complexity for operators in the energy supply chain.
In addition to shipping restrictions, further regulations could be envisaged, potentially affecting the banking sector, financial services, and even third-party players who indirectly facilitate the Russian oil trade.

Towards tighter energy penalties

Market players must anticipate new measures targeting not only the “phantom fleet”, but also other key sectors of the Russian economy.
The strategy of gradual sanctions is designed to increase Russia’s operating costs, thereby reducing its ability to finance its war effort.
Energy sector experts should keep a close eye on future developments, as the sanctions dynamic remains fluid and likely to harden depending on the situation in Ukraine.
The consequences for oil markets, shipping logistics and international relations underline the importance of heightened vigilance and rapid adaptation to the new realities of global trade in a context of prolonged conflict.

Azerbaijani energy infrastructure targeted in Ukraine raises concerns over the security of gas flows between Baku and Kyiv, just as a new supply agreement has been signed.
The suspension of 1,400 MW of electricity supplied by Iran to Iraq puts pressure on the Iraqi grid, while Tehran records a record 77 GW demand and must balance domestic consumption with regional obligations.
Beijing opposes the possible return of European trio sanctions against Iran, as the nuclear deal deadline approaches and diplomatic tensions rise around Tehran.
The United States plans to collaborate with Pakistan on critical minerals and hydrocarbons, exploring joint ventures and projects in strategic areas such as Balochistan.
Around 80 Russian technical standards for oil and gas have been internationally validated, notably by the United Arab Emirates, Algeria and Oman, according to the Institute of Oil and Gas Technological Initiatives.
Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
The two countries end 37 years of conflict with a 43-kilometer corridor under American control for 99 years. The infrastructure will transport 50 million tons of goods annually by 2030.
A senior official from the UN agency begins technical discussions with Iran on Monday, the first meeting since June strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
Consent Preferences