UK steps up pressure on Russian “Ghost Fleet

London imposes new sanctions on ten Russian vessels operating under flags of convenience to circumvent Western oil restrictions, intensifying economic pressure on Moscow.

Share:

Illustration flotte fantôme russe

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles offered per month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 35,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

The UK has announced a tightening of sanctions against a series of Russian vessels operating under foreign flags.
These ships, dubbed the “phantom fleet”, are used to transport oil and circumvent restrictions imposed by G7 countries and their allies since the invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
According to the UK Foreign Office, these sanctions prohibit ten of these vessels from accessing British ports and registering in the UK shipping register.
Previous sanctions having failed to deter Moscow from using these methods, London is stepping up its efforts to cut off access to world energy markets, the keystone of Russian state financing.
Oil exports will account for around 25% of Russia’s budget in 2023, and these new measures are designed to further restrict this vital source of revenue.

Leverage effect on Russian oil trade

The announcement comes at the same time as talks between British Foreign Secretary David Lammy and US Secretary of State Antony Blinken in Ukraine.
The aim of these meetings is to coordinate a coherent Western response to Russian bypass strategies.
The aim is to tighten the regulatory net around Russian oil exports and discourage the use of uninsured or flag-of-convenience vessels.
The new restrictions imposed by London mark the third round of measures against such vessels.
Three of the ten ships targeted have been identified as having carried over $5 billion worth of Russian oil since the start of the conflict.
The British government accuses these ships of allowing Moscow to continue its unrestricted oil sales, thereby helping to finance military operations in Ukraine.

Consequences for Russian Energy Markets and Strategies

The repercussions of sanctions on world energy markets could be significant.
By restricting Russia’s ability to export oil, London and its allies seek to influence not only trade flows, but also oil prices on world markets.
Although the immediate effects may be limited by Russia’s efforts to diversify its trade routes and partners, these actions create increased uncertainty for players in the energy sector.
In response, Moscow may redouble its efforts to forge alliances with non-aligned countries, or seek to circumvent sanctions through barter mechanisms or trade in local currencies.
Maritime operators, as well as insurers and reinsurers in the sector, could also face increased compliance and political risk challenges.

Implications for Western Energy Policies

These new measures are part of a wider strategy by the G7 countries to limit Russia’s energy revenues while minimizing disruption to their own economies.
The coordination between London and Washington, symbolized by the joint visit of Lammy and Blinken to Ukraine, shows a clear desire to maintain continuous pressure on Moscow.
British sanctions add a new layer of complexity for operators in the energy supply chain.
In addition to shipping restrictions, further regulations could be envisaged, potentially affecting the banking sector, financial services, and even third-party players who indirectly facilitate the Russian oil trade.

Towards tighter energy penalties

Market players must anticipate new measures targeting not only the “phantom fleet”, but also other key sectors of the Russian economy.
The strategy of gradual sanctions is designed to increase Russia’s operating costs, thereby reducing its ability to finance its war effort.
Energy sector experts should keep a close eye on future developments, as the sanctions dynamic remains fluid and likely to harden depending on the situation in Ukraine.
The consequences for oil markets, shipping logistics and international relations underline the importance of heightened vigilance and rapid adaptation to the new realities of global trade in a context of prolonged conflict.

Global South Utilities is investing $1 billion in new solar, wind and storage projects to strengthen Yemen's energy capacity and expand its regional influence.
British International Investment and FirstRand partner to finance the decarbonisation of African companies through a facility focused on supporting high-emission sectors.
Budapest moves to secure Serbian oil supply, threatened by Croatia’s suspension of crude flows following US sanctions on the Russian-controlled NIS refinery.
Moscow says it wants to increase oil and liquefied natural gas exports to Beijing, while consolidating bilateral cooperation amid US sanctions targeting Russian producers.
The European Investment Bank is mobilising €2bn in financing backed by the European Commission for energy projects in Africa, with a strategic objective rooted in the European Union’s energy diplomacy.
Russia faces a structural decline in energy revenues as strengthened sanctions against Rosneft and Lukoil disrupt trade flows and deepen the federal budget deficit.
Washington imposes new sanctions targeting vessels, shipowners and intermediaries in Asia, increasing the regulatory risk of Iranian oil trade and redefining maritime compliance in the region.
OFAC’s licence for Paks II circumvents sanctions on Rosatom in exchange for US technological involvement, reshaping the balance of interests between Moscow, Budapest and Washington.
Finland, Estonia, Hungary and Czechia are multiplying bilateral initiatives in Africa to capture strategic energy and mining projects under the European Global Gateway programme.
The Brazilian president calls for a voluntary and non-binding energy transition during COP30 in Belém, avoiding direct confrontation with oil-producing countries.
The region attracted only a small share of global capital allocated to renewables in 2024, despite high energy needs and ambitious development goals, according to a report published in November.
The United States approves South Korea’s development of civilian uranium enrichment capabilities and supports a nuclear-powered submarine project, expanding a strategic partnership already linked to a major trade agreement.
The EU member states agree to prioritise a loan mechanism backed by immobilised Russian assets to finance aid to Ukraine, reducing national budgetary impact while ensuring enhanced funding capacity.
The Canadian government commits $56 billion to a new wave of infrastructure projects aimed at expanding energy corridors, accelerating critical mineral extraction and reinforcing strategic capacity.
Berlin strengthens its cooperation with Abuja through funding aimed at supporting Nigeria’s energy diversification and consolidating its renewable infrastructure.
COP30 begins in Belém under uncertainty, as countries fail to agree on key discussion topics, highlighting deep divisions over climate finance and the global energy transition.
The United States secures a tungsten joint venture in Kazakhstan and mining protocols in Uzbekistan, with financing envisaged from the Export-Import Bank of the United States and shipment routed via the Trans-Caspian corridor.
The United States grants Hungary a one-year waiver on sanctions targeting Russian oil, in return for a commitment to purchase US liquefied natural gas worth $600mn.
Meeting in Canada, G7 energy ministers unveiled a series of projects aimed at securing supply chains for critical minerals, in response to China’s restrictions on rare earth exports.
Donald Trump announces an immediate reduction in tariffs on Chinese fentanyl-related imports from 20% to 10%, potentially impacting energy flows between Washington and Beijing.

All the latest energy news, all the time

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.