US tariffs on Chinese products: a turning point for world trade

Recent U.S. tariff increases on Chinese imports, affecting a variety of sectors, are raising concerns about their economic impact. This article explores the implications of these decisions on trade relations and the global economy.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €2/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

Recent U.S. tariff decisions on Chinese imports mark a significant turning point in trade relations between the two countries. The measures, which include tariff increases of up to 100% on electric vehicles, 50% on semiconductors, and 25% on batteries and steel, are designed to protect US industry while raising concerns about their economic impact.
The tariffs, which take effect on September 27, 2024, are part of a broader review of US trade policies, including Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974.
The impact of these new tariff measures is already palpable.
Chinese electric vehicles, for example, could see their price double on the US market, making them less competitive with local alternatives.
Similarly, higher tariffs on semiconductors could affect American electronics manufacturers, who rely heavily on these components for the production of various devices.
The automotive and renewable energy industries, meanwhile, could face increased costs due to tariff hikes on batteries and steel.

Economic repercussions and Chinese reactions

A study by the Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE) points out that tariffs imposed by previous administrations have already cost the US economy around $165 billion.
The new increases could exacerbate this situation, raising costs for consumers and businesses, particularly in the green technology and automotive sectors.
The Chinese Ministry of Commerce reacted by calling the measures “protectionism and unilateralism”, claiming that they would harm not only US businesses, but also the international trade order.
China also pointed out that exports of targeted products to the US amounted to tens of billions of dollars each year.
This highlights the importance of trade between the two countries and the potential consequences of the new restrictions.
The Ministry has indicated that it may take “necessary measures” to defend the interests of its companies and maintain the stability of the supply chain.

International reactions and global consequences

Reaction to these new measures is not limited to the USA and China.
Other countries, such as Canada, are considering introducing similar surtaxes on Chinese products, particularly in the battery and semiconductor sectors.
In Europe, officials have expressed concern about the impact these tariffs could have on global trade.
Political leaders such as German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson have pointed out that many electric vehicles imported from China come from European manufacturers operating in China, further complicating the economic and diplomatic situation.
The implications of these tariff measures go beyond bilateral relations.
According to the Cato Institute, these decisions are perceived to be driven by domestic political considerations, especially in the run-up to the 2024 US elections. However, these measures risk heightening trade tensions and reducing prospects for cooperation on crucial issues, such as the energy transition, where international collaboration is essential.

Future prospects and reflections

New tariff restrictions on Chinese products could have significant consequences not only for the USA and China, but also for international trade and global energy transition efforts.
Experts are concerned about the long-term effects on supply chains and consumer prices, which could rise as a result of these new taxes.
The current situation underlines the importance of constructive dialogue between nations to resolve trade frictions and avoid escalating tensions.
In this context, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce has expressed its wish to intensify dialogue with the USA and other trading partners to resolve these frictions through diplomatic means.
China is also preparing to actively defend its economic and commercial interests if necessary, which could lead to a new dynamic in international trade relations.
The next steps will be crucial in determining the impact of these measures on the global economy and on international cooperation efforts.

The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Brazil adopts new rules allowing immediate commercial measures to counter the U.S. decision to impose an exceptional 50% customs tariff on all Brazilian exports, threatening stability in bilateral trade valued at billions of dollars.
Several international agencies have echoed warnings by Teresa Ribera, Vice-President of the European Commission, about commercial risks related to Chinese competition, emphasizing the EU's refusal to engage in a price war.