US tariffs on Chinese products: a turning point for world trade

Recent U.S. tariff increases on Chinese imports, affecting a variety of sectors, are raising concerns about their economic impact. This article explores the implications of these decisions on trade relations and the global economy.

Share:

Gain full professional access to energynews.pro from 4.90$/month.
Designed for decision-makers, with no long-term commitment.

Over 30,000 articles published since 2021.
150 new market analyses every week to decode global energy trends.

Monthly Digital PRO PASS

Immediate Access
4.90$/month*

No commitment – cancel anytime, activation in 2 minutes.

*Special launch offer: 1st month at the indicated price, then 14.90 $/month, no long-term commitment.

Annual Digital PRO Pass

Full Annual Access
99$/year*

To access all of energynews.pro without any limits

*Introductory annual price for year one, automatically renewed at 149.00 $/year from the second year.

Recent U.S. tariff decisions on Chinese imports mark a significant turning point in trade relations between the two countries. The measures, which include tariff increases of up to 100% on electric vehicles, 50% on semiconductors, and 25% on batteries and steel, are designed to protect US industry while raising concerns about their economic impact.
The tariffs, which take effect on September 27, 2024, are part of a broader review of US trade policies, including Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974.
The impact of these new tariff measures is already palpable.
Chinese electric vehicles, for example, could see their price double on the US market, making them less competitive with local alternatives.
Similarly, higher tariffs on semiconductors could affect American electronics manufacturers, who rely heavily on these components for the production of various devices.
The automotive and renewable energy industries, meanwhile, could face increased costs due to tariff hikes on batteries and steel.

Economic repercussions and Chinese reactions

A study by the Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE) points out that tariffs imposed by previous administrations have already cost the US economy around $165 billion.
The new increases could exacerbate this situation, raising costs for consumers and businesses, particularly in the green technology and automotive sectors.
The Chinese Ministry of Commerce reacted by calling the measures “protectionism and unilateralism”, claiming that they would harm not only US businesses, but also the international trade order.
China also pointed out that exports of targeted products to the US amounted to tens of billions of dollars each year.
This highlights the importance of trade between the two countries and the potential consequences of the new restrictions.
The Ministry has indicated that it may take “necessary measures” to defend the interests of its companies and maintain the stability of the supply chain.

International reactions and global consequences

Reaction to these new measures is not limited to the USA and China.
Other countries, such as Canada, are considering introducing similar surtaxes on Chinese products, particularly in the battery and semiconductor sectors.
In Europe, officials have expressed concern about the impact these tariffs could have on global trade.
Political leaders such as German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson have pointed out that many electric vehicles imported from China come from European manufacturers operating in China, further complicating the economic and diplomatic situation.
The implications of these tariff measures go beyond bilateral relations.
According to the Cato Institute, these decisions are perceived to be driven by domestic political considerations, especially in the run-up to the 2024 US elections. However, these measures risk heightening trade tensions and reducing prospects for cooperation on crucial issues, such as the energy transition, where international collaboration is essential.

Future prospects and reflections

New tariff restrictions on Chinese products could have significant consequences not only for the USA and China, but also for international trade and global energy transition efforts.
Experts are concerned about the long-term effects on supply chains and consumer prices, which could rise as a result of these new taxes.
The current situation underlines the importance of constructive dialogue between nations to resolve trade frictions and avoid escalating tensions.
In this context, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce has expressed its wish to intensify dialogue with the USA and other trading partners to resolve these frictions through diplomatic means.
China is also preparing to actively defend its economic and commercial interests if necessary, which could lead to a new dynamic in international trade relations.
The next steps will be crucial in determining the impact of these measures on the global economy and on international cooperation efforts.

France intercepted a tanker linked to Russian exports, prompting Emmanuel Macron to call for a coordinated European response to hinder vessels bypassing oil sanctions.
The activation of the snapback mechanism reinstates all UN sanctions on Iran, directly affecting the defence, financial and maritime trade sectors.
Commissioner Dan Jørgensen visits Greenland to expand energy ties with the European Union, amid plans to double EU funding for the 2028–2034 period.
European and Iranian foreign ministers meet in New York to try to prevent the reinstatement of UN sanctions linked to Tehran’s nuclear programme.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announces a bilateral agreement with Mexico including targeted investments in energy corridors, logistics infrastructure and cross-border security.
The US president has called for an immediate end to Russian oil imports by NATO countries, denouncing a strategic contradiction as sanctions against Moscow are being considered.
Tehran withdrew a resolution denouncing attacks on its nuclear facilities, citing US pressure on IAEA members who feared suspension of Washington’s voluntary contributions.
Poland’s energy minister calls on European Union member states to collectively commit to halting Russian oil purchases within two years, citing increasing geopolitical risks.
Athens and Tripoli engage in a negotiation process to define their exclusive economic zones in the Mediterranean, amid geopolitical tensions and underwater energy stakes.
European powers demand concrete steps from Tehran on nuclear issue or United Nations sanctions will be reinstated, as IAEA inspections remain blocked and tensions with Washington persist.
Brussels confirms its target to end all Russian energy imports by 2028, despite growing diplomatic pressure from Washington amid the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.
Donald Trump threatens to escalate US sanctions against Russia, but only if NATO member states stop all Russian oil imports, which remain active via certain pipelines.
The two countries agreed to develop infrastructure dedicated to liquefied natural gas to strengthen Europe's energy security and boost transatlantic trade.
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei calls for modernising the oil industry and expanding export markets as Tehran faces the possible reactivation of 2015 nuclear deal sanctions.
The Ukrainian president demanded that Slovakia end its imports of Russian crude, offering an alternative supply solution amid ongoing war and growing diplomatic tensions over the Druzhba pipeline.
The United States cuts tariffs on Japanese imports to 15%, while Tokyo launches a massive investment plan targeting American energy, industry, and agriculture.
Brazil’s Cop 30 presidency aims to leverage the Dubai commitments to mobilise public and private actors despite ongoing deadlock in international negotiations.
Brasília has officially begun the process of joining the International Energy Agency, strengthening its strategic position on the global energy stage after years of close cooperation with the Paris-based organisation.
During a meeting in Beijing, Vladimir Putin called on Slovakia to suspend its energy deliveries to Ukraine, citing Ukrainian strikes on Russian energy infrastructure as justification.
Vladimir Putin and Robert Fico met in China to address the war in Ukraine, regional security and energy relations between Russia and Slovakia.