US tariff ultimatum pushes India towards new Asian trade alliances

Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.

Share:

The announcement of US tariffs of 25% plus penalty against India has triggered an accelerated reorganisation of regional trade chains. Indian authorities immediately intensified discussions with the European Union, the United Kingdom and Canada to finalise pending trade agreements. This strategic shift comes as bilateral Indo-US trade reached $129bn in 2024. Indian negotiators are actively exploring circumvention mechanisms through third-party platforms in Dubai, Singapore and Hong Kong.

Immediate opportunities for regional competitors
Vietnam is positioning itself as the main potential beneficiary of this reconfiguration. Vietnamese exporters of textiles and electronics are already preparing to expand capacity to capture US orders. Bangladesh anticipates a 15 to 20% increase in its textile exports to the United States within the next six months, according to estimates by the Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association. Indonesia is strengthening its capabilities in the pharmaceutical and chemical sectors to serve as an alternative base.
Trade data reveals these countries have preferential agreements or special status with the United States, enabling them to offer competitive alternatives. The cost of rerouting via these hubs would add around 3 to 5% to final prices, substantially less than the direct tariff impact. Port infrastructure in Singapore and Dubai is already seeing increased transshipment capacity requests from Indian firms.

Impact on Quad security architecture
The geopolitical dimension of the tariffs complicates cooperation within the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, which brings together the United States, India, Japan and Australia. This informal alliance, aimed at countering Chinese influence in the Indo-Pacific, is facing growing internal tensions. Japanese and Australian officials are privately expressing concerns about the impact of these trade measures on the group’s strategic cohesion.
India is maintaining its position of commercial non-alignment while participating in Quad security initiatives. Joint naval exercises scheduled for September 2025 remain on track, but discussions on integrating critical supply chains are experiencing a notable slowdown. Tokyo and Canberra are stepping up diplomatic efforts to mediate between Washington and New Delhi.

Accelerated realignment of pharmaceutical chains
The pharmaceutical sector illustrates the speed of ongoing adjustments. Indian generic drug manufacturers are establishing joint ventures in Vietnam and Thailand to maintain access to the US market. Sun Pharmaceutical, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories and Cipla are exploring offshore production options while retaining their research centres in India. This “China Plus One” strategy, initially adopted to reduce Chinese dependence, is now extending to an “India Plus One” approach.
US pharmaceutical regulators face a dilemma: maintaining quality standards while diversifying supply sources. The Food and Drug Administration has indicated it will accelerate inspections and approvals for new facilities in third countries. The typical 18- to 24-month approval timeline for new production units could be reduced to 12 months under an emergency programme.

12-month economic projections
Economic models suggest a significant redistribution of trade flows by mid-2026. Direct Indian exports to the United States could fall by 20 to 30% in value, partially offset by increased re-exports through third countries. The total cost for the US economy, including logistical inefficiencies and rerouting surcharges, could reach $8bn to $10bn annually.
Multilateral negotiations at the World Trade Organization will become increasingly important as India seeks to challenge the legality of US measures. The European Union is closely watching these developments, given its own interest in maintaining a rules-based multilateral trading system. The upcoming WTO ministerial meeting in November 2025 could become a crucial forum to address these rising trade tensions. Companies on both sides are adjusting their strategies to navigate this new environment characterised by greater fragmentation of global value chains.

Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Brazil adopts new rules allowing immediate commercial measures to counter the U.S. decision to impose an exceptional 50% customs tariff on all Brazilian exports, threatening stability in bilateral trade valued at billions of dollars.
Several international agencies have echoed warnings by Teresa Ribera, Vice-President of the European Commission, about commercial risks related to Chinese competition, emphasizing the EU's refusal to engage in a price war.
The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development lends €400 million to JSC Energocom to diversify Moldova's gas and electricity supply, historically dependent on Russian imports via Ukraine.
BRICS adopt a joint financial framework aimed at supporting emerging economies while criticizing European carbon border tax mechanisms, deemed discriminatory and risky for their strategic trade relations.
The European Commission is launching an alliance with member states and industrial players to secure the supply of critical chemicals, amid growing competition from the United States and China.
Trade between Russia and Saudi Arabia grew by over 60% in 2024 to surpass USD 3.8 billion, according to Russian Minister of Industry and Trade Anton Alikhanov, who outlined new avenues for industrial cooperation.
Meeting in Rio, BRICS nations urge global energy market stability, openly condemning Western sanctions and tariff mechanisms in a tense economic and geopolitical context.
Despite strong ties, Iran's dependence on oil revenues limits its ability to secure substantial strategic support from Russia and China amid current international and regional crises, according to several experts.
Egypt’s Electricity Minister engages in new talks with Envision Group, Windey, LONGi, China Energy, PowerChina, and ToNGWEI to boost local industry and attract investments in renewable energy.
The potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz places Gulf producers under intense pressure, highlighting their diplomatic and logistical limitations as a blockage threatens 20 million daily barrels of hydrocarbons destined for global markets.