US 2024 Election: Key Issues for the American LNG Sector

The 2024 US presidential election could reshape the trajectory of the liquefied natural gas (LNG) sector, with Kamala Harris and Donald Trump offering divergent strategies that could impact the regulatory framework, export permits, and international commercial perspectives.

Share:

Gain full professional access to energynews.pro from 4.90$/month.
Designed for decision-makers, with no long-term commitment.

Over 30,000 articles published since 2021.
150 new market analyses every week to decode global energy trends.

Monthly Digital PRO PASS

Immediate Access
4.90$/month*

No commitment – cancel anytime, activation in 2 minutes.

*Special launch offer: 1st month at the indicated price, then 14.90 $/month, no long-term commitment.

Annual Digital PRO Pass

Full Annual Access
99$/year*

To access all of energynews.pro without any limits

*Introductory annual price for year one, automatically renewed at 149.00 $/year from the second year.

The American LNG industry is facing regulatory uncertainty since the Biden administration’s decision to suspend reviews of export permits for countries without a free trade agreement with the United States. This suspension, justified by the need to reassess economic and environmental impacts, has slowed down several key infrastructure projects, delaying investment decisions and impacting the competitiveness of US LNG in the international market. For investors, the persistent uncertainty surrounding this suspension raises doubts about the viability of future expansions.

Most market players expect the suspension to end after the 2024 elections. However, the implications will vary depending on the elected candidate. A return of Donald Trump to the presidency could accelerate project approvals, risking confrontations with European environmental regulators. Conversely, Kamala Harris might maintain a more cautious approach focused on social and environmental impacts, potentially adding new evaluation criteria based on social and environmental considerations, further delaying decision-making processes.

Diverging Policies and Commercial Impacts

Donald Trump has promised to lift the permit suspension on his first day in office, advocating for a fast-tracked energy project policy. However, his approach could reignite trade tensions, particularly with China, a key potential market for American LNG. During his previous term, trade tensions led to a reduction in US gas exports to China, hampering negotiations for capacity expansion. Trump is also considering reintroducing high tariffs, which could damage commercial relations and affect the sector’s growth prospects.

Kamala Harris, on the other hand, remains ambiguous regarding her position on the gas sector. While she has expressed support for energy diversification during recent debates, her silence on the issue of gas exports raises questions. If Harris follows the Democratic line of restricting finance for fossil fuel infrastructure, the LNG sector could see its growth stifled, directly impacting US export potential.

Consequences for Ongoing Projects

The permit suspension has not only slowed down new projects but has also led to permit cancellations for existing infrastructure. Developer NextDecade, whose Rio Grande LNG project in Texas saw its permit revoked by the Washington D.C. Court of Appeals, exemplifies this trend. These judicial repercussions increase risks for other LNG developers, complicating financing in an uncertain regulatory climate.

This instability also affects international buyers’ perception. The recent acquisition by Australian Woodside Energy of the Driftwood LNG project in Louisiana, for instance, is seen as a risky bet in an increasingly unpredictable market. Woodside’s CEO, Meg O’Neill, has voiced concerns about the long-term impact of this instability on the confidence of international buyers.

New Constraints from the European Market

American energy policy is also influenced by new European environmental requirements, particularly regarding the traceability of methane emissions in the LNG supply chain. These constraints could disadvantage American exporters if the local regulatory framework is relaxed, as it might be under a Trump administration. US producers, facing laxer regulations domestically, could lose market share to competitors better aligned with European standards.

Chris Treanor, executive director of the Partnership to Address Global Emissions, believes that if the US scales back its methane tracking commitments, it could hurt its competitiveness. A rollback in standards could be interpreted as an “increase in pollution,” which would jeopardize negotiations with European buyers sensitive to environmental compliance.

An Uncertain Future for the American LNG Sector

The 2024 election could redefine the regulatory landscape for American LNG for the next decade. While developers hope for a swift end to the permit suspension, uncertainty persists. According to Jack Fusco, CEO of Cheniere, the divergence between Harris’s and Trump’s approaches could lead to strategic adjustments without fundamentally challenging the market.

However, growing regulatory pressure, combined with political uncertainty, could deter international buyers from committing to new long-term projects. Importers like JERA, Japan’s largest power producer, see portfolio diversification as a necessity in the face of current turbulence. The electoral context could thus freeze investment decisions until the US energy policy is clarified post-2024.

Re-elected president Irfaan Ali announces stricter production-sharing agreements to increase national economic returns.
Coal India issues tenders to develop 5 GW of renewable capacity, split between solar and wind, as part of its long-term energy strategy.
US utilities anticipate a rapid increase in high-intensity loads, targeting 147 GW of new capacity by 2035, with a strategic shift toward deregulated markets.
France opens a national consultation on RTE’s plan to invest €100 billion by 2040 to modernise the high-voltage electricity transmission grid.
Governor Gavin Newsom orders state agencies to fast-track clean energy projects to capture Inflation Reduction Act credits before deadlines expire.
Germany’s energy transition could cost up to €5.4tn ($6.3tn) by 2049, according to the main industry organisation, raising concerns over national competitiveness.
Facing blackouts imposed by the authorities, small businesses in Iran record mounting losses amid drought, fuel shortages and pressure on the national power grid.
Russian group T Plus plans to stabilise its electricity output at 57.6 TWh in 2025, despite a decline recorded in the first half of the year, according to Chief Executive Officer Pavel Snikkars.
In France, the Commission de régulation de l’énergie issues a clarification on ten statements shared over the summer, correcting several figures regarding tariffs, production and investments in the electricity sector.
A group of 85 researchers challenges the scientific validity of the climate report released by the US Department of Energy, citing partial methods and the absence of independent peer review.
Five energy infrastructure projects have been added to the list of cross-border renewable projects, making them eligible for financial support under the CEF Energy programme.
The Tanzanian government launches a national consultation to accelerate the rollout of compressed natural gas, mobilising public and private financing to secure energy supply and lower fuel costs.
The Kuwaiti government has invited three international consortia to submit bids for the first phase of the Al Khairan project, combining power generation and desalination.
Nigeria’s state-owned oil company abandons plans to sell the Port Harcourt refinery and confirms a maintenance programme despite high operating costs.
The publication of the Multiannual Energy Programme decree, awaited for two years, is compromised by internal political tensions, jeopardising strategic investments in nuclear and renewables.
The US Energy Information Administration reschedules or cancels several publications, affecting the availability of critical data for oil, gas and renewables markets.
Brazilian authorities have launched a large-scale operation targeting a money laundering system linked to the fuel sector, involving investment funds, fintechs, and more than 1,000 service stations across the country.
A national study by the Davies Group reveals widespread American support for the simultaneous development of both renewable and fossil energy sources, with strong approval for natural gas and solar energy.
The South Korean government compels ten petrochemical groups to cut up to 3.7 million tons of naphtha cracking per year, tying financial and tax support to swift and documented restructuring measures.
The U.S. Department of Energy has extended until November the emergency measures aimed at ensuring the stability of Puerto Rico’s power grid against overload risks and recurring outages.

Log in to read this article

You'll also have access to a selection of our best content.