Trump urges London to favor offshore oil over wind power

Donald Trump is calling on the United Kingdom to abandon wind energy in favor of revitalizing offshore oil extraction, sparking debate over the economic and political implications of such an energy strategy after their recent trade agreement.

Share:

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles offered per month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 35,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

U.S. President Donald Trump recently urged the United Kingdom to significantly reduce its investment in wind energy, which he describes as costly, to boost offshore oil drilling activities in the North Sea. According to Trump, the remaining reserves could ensure profitable exploitation for a century, with Aberdeen, Scotland, identified as a key hub for this revival. This statement comes shortly after both countries signed a partial trade agreement aimed at strengthening their bilateral exchanges. The American leader’s remarks have nonetheless raised controversy regarding potential conflicts of interest, particularly linked to his own economic interests in Aberdeen.

Disputed Oil Reserves

Donald Trump’s claims about abundant oil reserves in the North Sea have elicited mixed reactions from energy sector specialists. Sugandha Srivastav, an economist at the Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment at the University of Oxford, notably disputes these claims, estimating that the remaining quantities of oil and gas there are significantly lower than the American president asserts. The researcher emphasizes that extracting the remaining reserves would represent a high economic cost for the United Kingdom, negatively impacting taxpayers. Indeed, exploiting these offshore oil resources often involves substantial investments, particularly in advanced drilling technologies.

Furthermore, Trump’s suggestion comes at a strategic moment for the UK, as the country seeks to balance its energy mix while stabilizing domestic energy costs. Trump also criticizes the current British tax regime, which he considers outdated, claiming a modernized fiscal system favorable to the oil industry could rapidly reduce the country’s energy costs. However, this proposal also raises the sensitive question of potential economic advantages for American companies that might invest in these new British offshore drilling opportunities.

Impact on British Energy Strategy

The stance expressed by Donald Trump comes as the UK renewable energy sector, notably offshore wind power, continues to experience significant growth, driven by private investment and public subsidies. Despite notable reductions in production costs in recent years, wind turbines remain economically and politically contentious, mainly due to high initial costs and criticisms related to their integration into coastal landscapes. The American president explicitly labeled these facilities inefficient and aesthetically problematic—arguments frequently echoed by his supporters across the Atlantic.

Yet, according to recent economic analyses, the overall cost of wind energy is now competitive with fossil fuels such as natural gas or oil. Sugandha Srivastav thus highlights the long-term economic appeal of wind power, despite political and aesthetic criticisms voiced by President Trump. As of now, the British government has not publicly reacted to the American recommendations, likely due to the diplomatic and economic delicacy of the current situation between London and Washington.

Potential Economic Conflicts of Interest

President Trump’s recent recommendations regarding the UK’s energy choices also raise questions about potential personal or economic conflicts of interest. The Trump family owns a hotel and golf resort complex in Aberdeen, a Scottish city cited by the American president as a potential epicenter of offshore oil drilling activity. The geographic proximity of this property to proposed offshore drilling areas could theoretically influence its long-term economic value directly.

This situation contributes to the caution of British authorities, who face a delicate diplomatic and energy policy dilemma. The recent trade agreement between the United States and the United Kingdom strengthens economic ties between the two countries but also adds additional political pressure on the British government’s strategic choices. In this context, the energy sector and international investors will closely monitor London’s forthcoming decisions, which could have significant implications for the UK’s energy future.

Manila plans to expand gas and renewable energy production to meet a 6.6% increase in electricity demand over the next two years.
Ottawa and London increased bilateral exchanges to structure strategic cooperation on nuclear energy and critical minerals supply chains, as part of Canada’s G7 presidency.
Donald Trump says he secured Narendra Modi’s commitment to end Russian oil imports, adding political pressure to India-Russia trade relations.
Under intense diplomatic pressure from Washington, member states of the International Maritime Organization agreed to postpone by one year the adoption of a carbon pricing mechanism for global maritime transport.
Washington confirms it has mandated the CIA to carry out secret actions against Nicolas Maduro’s government, escalating tensions between the United States and Venezuela amid geostrategic and energy stakes.
Two European Parliament committees propose to advance the full halt of Russian hydrocarbon imports to 2026 and 2027, including oil, gas, and LNG, strengthening the European Union’s geopolitical position.
The COP30 conference hosted in the Amazon by Brazil faces low participation from global leaders, amid geopolitical tensions and major logistical challenges.
The United States has granted Trinidad and Tobago a special licence to resume negotiations with Venezuela on the Dragon gas field, partially lifting restrictions imposed on the Venezuelan energy sector.
Ambassadors of European Union member states have approved the transmission of a legislative proposal to phase out Russian fossil fuel imports by January 2028 to the Council of Ministers.
The State Duma has approved Russia’s formal withdrawal from a treaty signed with the United States on the elimination of military-grade plutonium, ending over two decades of strategic nuclear cooperation.
Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said it was not in Poland’s interest to extradite to Germany a Ukrainian citizen suspected of taking part in the explosions that damaged the Nord Stream gas pipelines in 2022.
Al-Harfi and SCLCO signed agreements with Syrian authorities to develop solar and wind capacity, amid an ongoing energy rapprochement between Riyadh and Damascus.
Faced with risks to Middle Eastern supply chains, Thai and Japanese refiners are turning to US crude, backed by tariff incentives and strategies aligned with ongoing bilateral trade discussions.
France intercepted a tanker linked to Russian exports, prompting Emmanuel Macron to call for a coordinated European response to hinder vessels bypassing oil sanctions.
The activation of the snapback mechanism reinstates all UN sanctions on Iran, directly affecting the defence, financial and maritime trade sectors.
Commissioner Dan Jørgensen visits Greenland to expand energy ties with the European Union, amid plans to double EU funding for the 2028–2034 period.
European and Iranian foreign ministers meet in New York to try to prevent the reinstatement of UN sanctions linked to Tehran’s nuclear programme.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announces a bilateral agreement with Mexico including targeted investments in energy corridors, logistics infrastructure and cross-border security.
The US president has called for an immediate end to Russian oil imports by NATO countries, denouncing a strategic contradiction as sanctions against Moscow are being considered.
Tehran withdrew a resolution denouncing attacks on its nuclear facilities, citing US pressure on IAEA members who feared suspension of Washington’s voluntary contributions.

All the latest energy news, all the time

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.