Traceability of critical minerals: UN calls for rigorous global framework

The UN is proposing a global traceability system for critical minerals, crucial to the energy transition, to prevent social and environmental abuses in their supply chain.

Share:

Mine de terres rares

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

With the rise of renewable energies and the increasing production of electric vehicles, global demand for critical minerals such as copper, cobalt, nickel, lithium and rare earths is intensifying.
These raw materials are essential for the manufacture of batteries and electronic components.
According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), demand for these minerals could quadruple by 2040 to meet targets for limiting global warming to 1.5°C.
This strong demand is leading to fears of shortages and market tensions, exacerbated by often opaque mining practices.
To oversee this growth, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has set up a committee of experts to develop guidelines to ensure more responsible exploitation of these resources.
The group, made up of representatives from government ministries, non-governmental organizations and mining sector specialists, recently presented a set of seven guiding principles designed to frame the production chain for critical minerals.

Towards a framework of transparency and accountability

UN experts advocate the adoption of a global system of traceability, transparency and accountability covering the entire supply chain of critical minerals.
This system would be based on an independent assessment of the environmental and social performance of mining companies, including criteria such as workers’ rights, respect for local communities, greenhouse gas emissions and environmental impacts.
This approach aims to harmonize existing practices and create a common framework for all players, from producer countries to processing companies.
The proposal for such a traceability system comes at a time when the practices of certain mining companies, particularly in developing countries, are often criticized for their lack of transparency and for human rights violations.
Indeed, the benefits of natural resource exploitation are not always equitably shared, leaving local communities without adequate compensation despite the negative impacts on their environment and health.

Benefit sharing and rehabilitation of mining sites

To complement this transparency framework, the UN committee recommends the establishment of a global fund financed by governments and companies.
The aim of this fund would be to support the rehabilitation of mining sites after closure, and to compensate the local populations affected.
This is a measure to remedy the legacy of many past mining projects, where abandoned and unrehabilitated sites continue to cause considerable environmental and health damage.
The fund would also encourage more responsible mining practices and promote a better distribution of profits.
Developing countries, often the main suppliers of these critical minerals, would thus be able to obtain a fairer return on the exploitation of their natural resources.
The report points out that without such an approach, inequalities between producer and consumer countries will continue to grow, to the detriment of local populations.

The challenges of global implementation

While the principles established by the UN committee of experts provide an ambitious framework, their implementation remains complex.
The creation of a global traceability system would require the commitment and cooperation of multiple players, from governments to private companies.
Moreover, the mining sector is marked by a diversity of national practices and regulations, making standardization of standards and processes difficult to achieve.
The need for independent assessment adds a further layer of complexity, particularly in terms of financing and governance.
The experts also highlight the importance of reducing dependence on critical minerals through more responsible consumption and recycling of materials.
This includes technological innovation, which could reduce the quantity of minerals needed in renewable technologies.
However, these advances are not yet widespread, and their large-scale adoption remains uncertain.

A framework for more responsible operations

While some industry players are considering exploring new mining frontiers, such as the seabed, the UN committee’s report focuses solely on landmines, where social and environmental impacts are already well documented.
This focus could, at first, help to answer critics while offering a more tangible framework for implementation.
However, there are already calls to extend this framework to the new forms of exploitation on the horizon.
The question of traceability of critical minerals is now being raised on the international stage as a key issue in the energy transition.
The UN committee’s proposals could serve as a basis for future negotiations aimed at establishing international standards.
However, their success will depend on the commitment of stakeholders and the collective will to make the mining sector more transparent, accountable and equitable.

The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Brazil adopts new rules allowing immediate commercial measures to counter the U.S. decision to impose an exceptional 50% customs tariff on all Brazilian exports, threatening stability in bilateral trade valued at billions of dollars.
Several international agencies have echoed warnings by Teresa Ribera, Vice-President of the European Commission, about commercial risks related to Chinese competition, emphasizing the EU's refusal to engage in a price war.