The West Condemns Iran’s Lack of Cooperation on Nuclear Program

The United States and European nations have presented a resolution at the IAEA condemning Iran for failing to fully cooperate on its nuclear program. Tehran warns of repercussions following this decision.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

The United States and European nations, represented by France, Germany, and the United Kingdom (E3), have officially submitted a resolution condemning Iran at the Board of Governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). This resolution, set for a vote on Thursday in Vienna, marks an escalation in tensions surrounding Iran’s nuclear program.

This resolution, although symbolic at this stage, follows a series of unsuccessful attempts to obtain clarifications regarding traces of uranium found at two undeclared sites in Iran, Turquzabad and Varamin. Despite a recent visit to Tehran by IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi, progress described as “positive” by Iranian authorities has not reassured Western powers.

An alarming escalation

During discussions with Mr. Grossi, Iranian President Massoud Pezeshkian reiterated his commitment to dispelling “doubts and ambiguities” about the country’s nuclear program. In a confidential report, the IAEA confirmed that Iran has initiated preparations to limit the growth of its 60%-enriched uranium stockpile. However, this step has been met with skepticism by Washington and its allies, who view it as a tactic to buy time.

Iran’s enriched uranium reserves, now estimated at 182.3 kilograms, are a significant concern. This stockpile, far exceeding the 3.67% limit stipulated by the 2015 international agreement (JCPOA), is sufficient to produce several nuclear bombs.

Tehran’s firm warning

In response to this resolution, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi warned of consequences. During a conversation with Rafael Grossi, he argued that the Western initiative risks “unnecessarily complicating” the situation.

“Iran will react appropriately,” stated Mr. Araghchi, while asserting that the resolution undermines the positive atmosphere of recent exchanges between Tehran and the IAEA.

A pact in shambles

The 2015 agreement, known as the JCPOA, aimed to limit Iran’s nuclear ambitions in exchange for lifting international sanctions. However, the unilateral withdrawal of the United States under President Donald Trump in 2018 disrupted this balance.

Since then, Iran has escalated its nuclear program, reaching enrichment levels close to the 90% threshold required for a nuclear weapon. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot called this escalation “concerning,” citing “major risks of nuclear proliferation.”

Geopolitical and security stakes

Iran, the only non-nuclear-armed state enriching uranium to such levels, justifies its actions as necessary for civilian energy needs. However, Western powers remain concerned about Tehran’s true intentions, particularly amid heightened regional tensions.

Meanwhile, diplomatic efforts to revive the JCPOA remain stalled. France and its European partners continue to advocate for renewed negotiations, but Moscow and Beijing’s support for Tehran limits available options.

Russia continues hydrocarbon deliveries to India and explores new outlets for liquefied natural gas, amid escalating trade tensions with the United States.
Azerbaijani energy infrastructure targeted in Ukraine raises concerns over the security of gas flows between Baku and Kyiv, just as a new supply agreement has been signed.
The suspension of 1,400 MW of electricity supplied by Iran to Iraq puts pressure on the Iraqi grid, while Tehran records a record 77 GW demand and must balance domestic consumption with regional obligations.
Beijing opposes the possible return of European trio sanctions against Iran, as the nuclear deal deadline approaches and diplomatic tensions rise around Tehran.
The United States plans to collaborate with Pakistan on critical minerals and hydrocarbons, exploring joint ventures and projects in strategic areas such as Balochistan.
Around 80 Russian technical standards for oil and gas have been internationally validated, notably by the United Arab Emirates, Algeria and Oman, according to the Institute of Oil and Gas Technological Initiatives.
Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
The two countries end 37 years of conflict with a 43-kilometer corridor under American control for 99 years. The infrastructure will transport 50 million tons of goods annually by 2030.
A senior official from the UN agency begins technical discussions with Iran on Monday, the first meeting since June strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
Consent Preferences