The United States sanctions Gazprom Neft and 200 Russian ships worth $23 billion

Washington and London impose historic sanctions on the Russian energy sector, targeting Gazprom Neft and a fleet of 200 ships. Moscow accuses the U.S. of global destabilization, while Biden defends the strategic impact.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

The G7 countries and China are evaluating hydrogen production costs based on specific economic criteria to determine an acceptable breakeven price for industries and end-users. In the United States, for instance, the heavy transport sector in California sets a breakeven threshold of $5 to $7 per kilogram to compete with diesel, with prices at the pump reaching up to $9 per kilogram. In American petrochemicals, the benchmark is significantly lower: Gulf Coast producers report paying as little as $0.80 to $1 per kilogram for standard hydrogen, complicating the integration of costlier low-carbon options. The price gap between conventional hydrogen and low-carbon hydrogen is due to the technological maturity of amortized sites and the difficulty of passing on the added costs to the final consumer.

Competitiveness Gap in Europe and Japan

In Europe, the production of green hydrogen through electrolysis currently ranges from €2.50 to €5.50 per kilogram, depending on the electricity source (wind, solar, or nuclear). European targets aim for prices between €1.50 and €2 to compete with fossil fuels. Sector studies indicate that in Germany, supply costs for heavy transport can reach €9 per kilogram delivered, while in industry, some initiatives aim to offset the gap through subsidies. In Japan, where hydrogen is seen as a strategic pillar, production costs range between $10 and $12 per kilogram. However, stakeholders are targeting a threshold of around $6 to $7 per kilogram to compete with liquefied natural gas (LNG) and encourage adoption in heavy transport.
Factors influencing prices include the availability of renewable energy, production scale, and the ability to quickly amortize investments. In Japan, small-scale electrolysis projects and heavy reliance on imported fossil fuels keep prices higher than in Europe. The Japanese government supports subsidy programs and funds infrastructure to drive down these costs. For industry players, this represents an energy independence issue, justifying a higher price point compared to other regions.

United Kingdom, Canada, and Italy: Prospects for Cost Reduction

The United Kingdom is investing in blue hydrogen (from natural gas with CO₂ capture) and green hydrogen to bring costs down to £2 to £3 per kilogram by 2030, compared to £4 to £6 today for the cleanest solutions. Initial projects, concentrated in industrial hubs such as Teesside and Humber, aim to make this energy vector competitive for steelmaking, petrochemicals, and transport.
Canada, meanwhile, benefits from abundant hydropower resources to produce green hydrogen at around CA$4 to CA$6 per kilogram. Its blue hydrogen, often cheaper, is priced between CA$2 and CA$3 per kilogram, supported by the proximity of gas fields and COâ‚‚ capture sites.
Italy, integrated into the European Union’s global strategy, applies the same price ranges as its neighbors for green hydrogen, around €2.50 to €5.50 per kilogram. The challenges lie in integrating hydrogen into the existing gas grid and establishing supply corridors to support industrial demand. Financial aid and the gradual reduction in the cost of electrolyzers are key factors enabling Italian industries to target lower prices in the coming years.

China’s Central Role and Competitiveness Goals

China, the world’s largest hydrogen producer by volume, is striving to lower the cost of green hydrogen, currently estimated at $3 to $4 per kilogram, through locally produced, lower-cost electrolyzers. Official targets aim for $2.50 per kilogram by 2030 to directly compete with diesel and LNG for heavy transport vehicles. The rapid development of refueling stations, already numbering over 450 nationwide, is accompanied by targeted initiatives in steelmaking and chemicals.
China’s hydrogen competitiveness is supported by its market size, declining equipment manufacturing costs, and government-driven momentum. Industries such as hydrogen-based steel production benefit from massive investments to accelerate the transition. However, questions remain about reducing emissions from gray hydrogen, which is cheap and widely used.

Sectoral Impacts and Industrial Trade-Offs

Several industries in the G7 and China see low-carbon hydrogen as a future lever, but the main obstacle lies in the price gap compared to natural gas or other traditional fuels. The heavy transport and chemical sectors are sensitive to even minor cost increases, requiring a precise breakeven threshold. In the U.S., Gulf Coast petrochemicals favor gray hydrogen priced between $0.80 and $1 per kilogram, making it difficult to integrate a green option that can cost double or triple. In Japan and Canada, subsidies are deemed essential to encourage industries and municipalities to adopt hydrogen solutions.
Public policies play a significant role in guiding investments and setting target prices, particularly through tax credits, guaranteed rates, or demand-support mechanisms. Industrial stakeholders hope to amortize their facilities more quickly and justify higher breakeven costs. Potential benefits could include massive COâ‚‚ emission reductions, more diversified energy supplies, and better resilience to fossil market volatility.

Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Consent Preferences