Oil: a new drastic cut that benefits Russia

Opec+ members have reduced their oil production, causing prices to soar. This decision strengthens the Russian-Saudi couple and puts the United States in difficulty.

Share:

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles offered per month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 35,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

The surprise decision on Sunday by some Opec+ members to drastically reduce their oil production, which caused a surge in prices on Monday, is a boon for Moscow and further proof of the strength of the Russian-Saudi couple.

Why such a decision?

The measure was taken by eight members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies (Opec+), for a total of over one million barrels per day. Unlike the cuts implemented in response to the Covid-19 pandemic, they preferred to act without going through the formal framework of the alliance, which requires the agreement of everyone, namely the 13 Opec countries and their 10 partners.

“We are witnessing the emergence of an Opec group+ agile, capable and willing to take the lead,” said Bjarne Schieldrop, an analyst at SEB Bank. Opec, established in 1960 and based in Vienna, aims to “coordinate oil policies” of its members to ensure “fair and stable prices for producers.” It formed Opec+ in 2016 by including new allies, including Russia and Oman. It is precisely this argument of “stability” that was invoked Monday by the alliance, while oil prices have suffered greatly from the recent banking crisis in the United States and Europe.

Fears of a global recession have resurfaced and investors have shifted from risky assets, such as commodities, to safe havens. For Stephen Innes, analyst at SPI Asset Management, “Opec+ has decided to draw a red line at 80 dollars a barrel of Brent (North Sea oil, editor’s note).

How does it support Moscow?

The prospect of sharp cuts immediately sent prices back up, especially since it comes against a backdrop of strong demand with the economic reopening of China, the world’s largest importer of crude oil. This upturn is particularly beneficial to Russia, which “needs oil to finance its costly war in Ukraine,” says Schieldrop.

Moscow has, in fact, been the target of numerous Western sanctions in reaction to its invasion of Ukraine, the purpose of which was precisely to reduce the financial windfall from black gold. For the SEB expert, the decision thus confirms that “Russia is still an integral and important part” of the Opec group. And it further strengthens the Russian-Saudi couple, which the war has not shaken. On the contrary, note the experts, who observe this solid common front in the face of the turbulence of recent months.

Especially since the two heavyweights of the alliance are now on an equal footing: by significantly lowering its production, Saudi Arabia is approaching the lower volume sold by Russia under the effect of sanctions.

Why is this a setback for Washington?

The United States had already taken the previous reduction announced in October badly. This is “a new challenge for consumer countries, which are struggling with high interest rates and high inflation,” say DNB analysts. U.S. officials reacted Monday to the surprise production cuts by calling them “not appropriate,” through John Kirby, a White House spokesman. He noted, however, that oil prices have declined since the fall.

“We are focused on price, not barrel count,” he added. While Opec+ was born in response to the challenges posed by American competition, it is no longer afraid of shale oil produced in the United States, whose growth is slowing down.

The organization, which dominates the market with 60% of black gold exports, “has significant power to set prices” compared to the situation a few years ago, according to Innes. On the diplomatic front too, “Saudi Arabia does not fear the United States”, which has a complex relationship with Riyadh and has lost influence in the region, notes Neil Wilson, an analyst at Finalto.

“We are witnessing a new era,” he says, as evidenced by the recent rapprochement between Iran and Saudi Arabia under the auspices of China. “The Saudis are doing what they have to do and the White House obviously has no say in the matter,” he summarizes.

Three Russian tankers targeted off the Turkish coast have reignited Ankara’s concerns about oil and gas supply security in the Black Sea and the vulnerability of its subsea infrastructure.
Bucharest authorises an exceptional takeover of Lukoil’s local assets to avoid a supply shock while complying with international sanctions. Three buyers are already in advanced talks.
European governments want to add review and safeguard mechanisms to the trade deal with Washington to prevent a potential surge of US imports from disrupting their industrial base.
The Khor Mor gas field, operated by Pearl Petroleum, was hit by an armed drone, halting production and causing power outages affecting 80% of Kurdistan’s electricity capacity.
Global South Utilities is investing $1 billion in new solar, wind and storage projects to strengthen Yemen's energy capacity and expand its regional influence.
British International Investment and FirstRand partner to finance the decarbonisation of African companies through a facility focused on supporting high-emission sectors.
Budapest moves to secure Serbian oil supply, threatened by Croatia’s suspension of crude flows following US sanctions on the Russian-controlled NIS refinery.
Moscow says it wants to increase oil and liquefied natural gas exports to Beijing, while consolidating bilateral cooperation amid US sanctions targeting Russian producers.
The European Investment Bank is mobilising €2bn in financing backed by the European Commission for energy projects in Africa, with a strategic objective rooted in the European Union’s energy diplomacy.
Russia faces a structural decline in energy revenues as strengthened sanctions against Rosneft and Lukoil disrupt trade flows and deepen the federal budget deficit.
Washington imposes new sanctions targeting vessels, shipowners and intermediaries in Asia, increasing the regulatory risk of Iranian oil trade and redefining maritime compliance in the region.
OFAC’s licence for Paks II circumvents sanctions on Rosatom in exchange for US technological involvement, reshaping the balance of interests between Moscow, Budapest and Washington.
Finland, Estonia, Hungary and Czechia are multiplying bilateral initiatives in Africa to capture strategic energy and mining projects under the European Global Gateway programme.
The Brazilian president calls for a voluntary and non-binding energy transition during COP30 in Belém, avoiding direct confrontation with oil-producing countries.
The region attracted only a small share of global capital allocated to renewables in 2024, despite high energy needs and ambitious development goals, according to a report published in November.
The United States approves South Korea’s development of civilian uranium enrichment capabilities and supports a nuclear-powered submarine project, expanding a strategic partnership already linked to a major trade agreement.
The EU member states agree to prioritise a loan mechanism backed by immobilised Russian assets to finance aid to Ukraine, reducing national budgetary impact while ensuring enhanced funding capacity.
The Canadian government commits $56 billion to a new wave of infrastructure projects aimed at expanding energy corridors, accelerating critical mineral extraction and reinforcing strategic capacity.
Berlin strengthens its cooperation with Abuja through funding aimed at supporting Nigeria’s energy diversification and consolidating its renewable infrastructure.
COP30 begins in Belém under uncertainty, as countries fail to agree on key discussion topics, highlighting deep divisions over climate finance and the global energy transition.

All the latest energy news, all the time

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.