Israel strikes Iran, uncertainty over US nuclear negotiations in Oman

Israeli strikes against Iranian nuclear sites disrupt US-Iranian talks on the nuclear deal. Tehran now considers canceling the upcoming negotiation round in Oman, heightening regional economic concerns.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

Israel has launched a series of major airstrikes dubbed “Operation Rising Lion,” primarily targeting Iran’s military and nuclear infrastructure. The attacks targeted over a hundred facilities, notably at Natanz, Isfahan, and Arak. In response, Iran initiated a counterattack named “True Promise III,” firing more than 150 ballistic missiles and drones into Israeli territory. The human toll is already substantial, with dozens of deaths reported in both countries, including civilians.

Impacts on the regional energy sector

These military developments directly affect the regional energy sector, notably due to the geographic proximity of the strikes to major oil basins in the Persian Gulf. International markets fear rising crude prices amid potential disruptions of maritime supply routes. Energy sector analysts are closely monitoring the Strait of Hormuz, through which approximately 20% of global oil passes, to evaluate possible economic repercussions.

The United States had planned a new round of indirect negotiations with Iran regarding controls over its nuclear program in exchange for partial lifting of economic sanctions. These talks, initially scheduled to take place in Oman, were viewed as crucial for restoring stability to global energy markets. Tehran now considers continuing the negotiations meaningless due to the military escalation.

International stance amid military escalation

Several countries have expressed concern over the economic and geopolitical repercussions of the current tensions. China, the United Kingdom, and Australia have publicly urged restraint, fearing negative consequences for international markets. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump, while officially supporting Israel, has warned Iran of massive reprisals if American interests are threatened.

The private sector, especially businesses active in the Gulf region, is closely observing developments in the security and diplomatic situation. Any worsening of the crisis could not only impact local operations but also significantly disrupt international investments and regional financial flows. Oil and gas companies operating in the Gulf region have already begun preparing contingency plans in case of prolonged disruption.

Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Consent Preferences