Accusations in Kosovo: Explosion on Vital Canal Fuels Tensions with Serbia

An explosion targeting a strategic canal in Kosovo has heightened tensions with Serbia, accused of orchestrating the attack. Belgrade denies these allegations, while investigations intensify in an already unstable climate.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

An explosion on Friday evening near Zubin Potok, in northwestern Kosovo, severely damaged a section of the Ibar-Lepenac canal, essential for the country’s drinking water supply and energy production. This incident is deemed “the worst attack on infrastructure” since the end of the 1998–1999 war, according to the Kosovar government, which blames Serbia as the perpetrator. Meanwhile, Belgrade denies any involvement.

The canal plays a vital role in supplying water to thousands of households and two thermal power plants critical to Kosovo’s energy grid. Although the attack has not yet disrupted electricity production, it has significantly reduced water supply, providing only a quarter of the usual capacity on Saturday morning.

Investigation and Arrests

The Kosovar government, supported by local and international forces, has launched an extensive investigation, conducting raids at ten locations and arresting eight suspects. According to Kosovo’s Minister of the Interior, Xhelal Svecla, these acts amount to “organized terrorism” involving professional groups. Weapons, military uniforms, and various equipment were seized, further fueling suspicions of a meticulously planned operation.

Kosovar Prime Minister Albin Kurti visited the explosion site and stated that only organized groups with the capabilities and motivations could have carried out such an operation. He identified Serbia as the primary instigator, an accusation Belgrade calls “baseless.”

International Reactions

The incident has drawn strong condemnations from the European Union, the United States, France, and Turkey. Josep Borrell, the EU’s High Representative, described the attack as “terrorist” and called for an immediate de-escalation. France has demanded a thorough investigation, while Turkey has offered support to ease tensions.

NATO’s KFOR mission in Kosovo now monitors strategic installations, reinforcing security measures to prevent further attacks. The Kosovar government has also increased surveillance of critical infrastructure.

Serbia’s Position

Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic condemned what he called a “hybrid attack” aimed at discrediting Serbia and destabilizing the region. He emphasized that Belgrade is conducting its own investigation and urged calm. The Serbian List, the main political party representing Kosovo’s Serbian minority, also condemned the attack while calling for an impartial international investigation.

A Climate of Persistent Tensions

Relations between Kosovo and Serbia remain strained, with frequent spikes in violence, particularly in Serbian-majority areas of northern Kosovo. This incident comes just weeks before crucial legislative elections in Kosovo, raising fears of escalating tensions. Experts suggest the attack could further complicate fragile EU-mediated talks between Belgrade and Pristina.

Russia continues hydrocarbon deliveries to India and explores new outlets for liquefied natural gas, amid escalating trade tensions with the United States.
Azerbaijani energy infrastructure targeted in Ukraine raises concerns over the security of gas flows between Baku and Kyiv, just as a new supply agreement has been signed.
The suspension of 1,400 MW of electricity supplied by Iran to Iraq puts pressure on the Iraqi grid, while Tehran records a record 77 GW demand and must balance domestic consumption with regional obligations.
Beijing opposes the possible return of European trio sanctions against Iran, as the nuclear deal deadline approaches and diplomatic tensions rise around Tehran.
The United States plans to collaborate with Pakistan on critical minerals and hydrocarbons, exploring joint ventures and projects in strategic areas such as Balochistan.
Around 80 Russian technical standards for oil and gas have been internationally validated, notably by the United Arab Emirates, Algeria and Oman, according to the Institute of Oil and Gas Technological Initiatives.
Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
The two countries end 37 years of conflict with a 43-kilometer corridor under American control for 99 years. The infrastructure will transport 50 million tons of goods annually by 2030.
A senior official from the UN agency begins technical discussions with Iran on Monday, the first meeting since June strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
Consent Preferences