Nord Stream, too early to talk about Sabotage?

Sabotage is the preferred explanation for the Nord Stream leaks. The United States is calming the game. They are waiting for the results of the investigation before making a decision. They say they are ready to support Europe in this.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

Nord Stream is once again in the news. Leaks have been identified and these follow explosions. The international community is already talking about sabotage. However, the United States is calming down. A senior military official believes that it is still too early to conclude that it was sabotage.

Nord Stream victim of sabotage?

Indeed, the Nord Stream pipelines are at the center of the escalating energy war between Europe and Moscow. As a result of the explosions, Russian gas continues to leak into the Baltic Sea. While many actors speak of sabotage, the identity of the person responsible remains unknown.

Unlike some of its allies, the United States is more cautious. However, the country recognizes the concerns of an attack on the infrastructure of NATO allies.

In response to the explosions that occurred, the top U.S. military official says:

“The jury is still out. A lot of our partners, I think, have determined or believe that it’s sabotage. I’m just…I’m not at the point where I can tell you one thing or the other.”

However, it excludes the involvement of the military. In response to Maria Zakharova, spokesperson for Russian diplomacy, he comments:

“We were absolutely not involved.”

Thus, the United States is awaiting the conclusions of the investigation launched following the Nord Stream leaks. Karine Jean-Pierre, spokeswoman for the White House, says:

“I don’t want to get ahead of the investigation.”

The United States offers its support to Europe

An investigation has been opened to determine the causes of the Nord Stream leaks. The U.S. military official says the United States has not been asked to provide support. In fact, the country could use its underwater military capabilities in this investigation.

The civil servant comments:

“We’re like a number of other countries with capabilities that could certainly help, but we haven’t been asked to do that. And again, there are a lot of countries out there that have a submarine capability.”

Lloyd Austin, U.S. Secretary of Defense, confirms U.S. support. According to a senior Pentagon official, Austin offered his assistance to his Danish counterpart in a telephone conversation.

Tamara Lawrence, spokesperson for the U.S. Naval Forces Europe and Africa, also offered her assistance. The U.S. Navy is therefore ready to participate in the Nord Stream investigation. He added that this would be done “in close coordination with our allies and partners”.

Nord Stream, at the heart of the energy war between the EU and Moscow

Nord Stream is, in fact, at the heart of the energy war between Europe and Russia. Moscow had initially reduced the flow of Russian gas via Nord Stream 1. The flow was then suspended in August. The EU accuses Russia of using its gas as a weapon, Moscow explains that Western sanctions have caused technical difficulties.

Following the Nord Stream explosions, the EU has promised a “robust” response. She suspects sabotage. Moscow refutes the accusations pointing the finger at Russia. Its embassy in Denmark says that sabotage of Nord Stream is an attack on the energy security of Europe, but also of Russia.

Russia continues hydrocarbon deliveries to India and explores new outlets for liquefied natural gas, amid escalating trade tensions with the United States.
Azerbaijani energy infrastructure targeted in Ukraine raises concerns over the security of gas flows between Baku and Kyiv, just as a new supply agreement has been signed.
The suspension of 1,400 MW of electricity supplied by Iran to Iraq puts pressure on the Iraqi grid, while Tehran records a record 77 GW demand and must balance domestic consumption with regional obligations.
Beijing opposes the possible return of European trio sanctions against Iran, as the nuclear deal deadline approaches and diplomatic tensions rise around Tehran.
The United States plans to collaborate with Pakistan on critical minerals and hydrocarbons, exploring joint ventures and projects in strategic areas such as Balochistan.
Around 80 Russian technical standards for oil and gas have been internationally validated, notably by the United Arab Emirates, Algeria and Oman, according to the Institute of Oil and Gas Technological Initiatives.
Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
The two countries end 37 years of conflict with a 43-kilometer corridor under American control for 99 years. The infrastructure will transport 50 million tons of goods annually by 2030.
A senior official from the UN agency begins technical discussions with Iran on Monday, the first meeting since June strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
Consent Preferences