EU suspends 93 billion euros in tariffs against Washington

Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.

Share:

The European Commission announced Monday, August 4, the six-month suspension of its 93 billion euro counter-tariff measures that were set to take effect August 7 against the United States. This decision comes as Brussels and Washington work to finalize the terms of their trade agreement reached July 27 between Ursula von der Leyen and Donald Trump. Commission spokesperson for trade Olof Gill confirmed that the European Union (EU) was continuing negotiations with the United States to finalize a joint statement, while emphasizing that this suspension aimed to restore stability and predictability for citizens and businesses on both sides of the Atlantic.

The framework agreement provides for a single 15% tariff on most European goods exported to the United States, notably including the automotive sector which sees its customs duties reduced from 27.5% to 15%. This measure nevertheless represents a substantial increase from the average rate of 1.2% in effect before the Trump presidency. The aerospace sector and certain chemical products benefit from exemptions, while tariffs on steel and aluminum remain at 50%.

Major economic impact on both economies

Economic projections reveal significant consequences for both trading blocs. European gross domestic product (GDP) is expected to contract by 0.3% while the American economy could suffer a more marked decline of 0.7% in a scenario without a final agreement. Germany, Europe’s leading export-dependent economy, faces an anticipated contraction of 0.4% of its GDP. American households will bear an average additional cost of $1,300 in 2025, with particularly pronounced price increases in clothing (+38%), automobiles (+12% or $5,800 more per new vehicle) and food (+3.3%).

The employment impact also appears concerning with a potential loss of 497,000 jobs in the United States by the end of 2025 and an unemployment rate increase of 0.7 percentage points by the end of 2026. Ireland appears as the most vulnerable European country in terms of employment, followed by Italy, particularly exposed in the transport and fashion sectors.

Colossal financial commitments and European divisions

The agreement includes massive financial commitments from the EU: $750 billion in purchases of American energy products (liquefied natural gas, oil and nuclear fuels) spread over three years, as well as $600 billion in additional investments in the United States by 2028. These amounts raise questions about their feasibility, as the EU has no authority to compel private companies to make such purchases. The European Commission has moreover emphasized the political and “not legally binding” nature of this agreement.

Divisions among member states remain palpable. While Germany favors a quick agreement to protect its automotive industry, France strongly criticizes the “unbalanced” nature of the deal. French Prime Minister François Bayrou called the agreement a “dark day” for Europe, accusing Brussels of having yielded to the American president. The Netherlands adopts a pragmatic position while Italy considers the 15% rate “sustainable” for its economy.

Strategic sectors under high tension

The pharmaceutical sector, representing $127 billion in American imports from the EU in 2024, remains in uncertainty with an ongoing Section 232 investigation that could result in additional tariffs. This situation generates potential costs of $100 million per day in new tariffs for American companies. Ireland finds itself particularly exposed, with pharmaceutical exports representing 55% of its total exports to the United States. Popular weight-loss drugs like Ozempic and Wegovy, using semaglutide produced by Novo Nordisk, are among the potentially impacted products.

The European automotive industry faces considerable challenges despite the obtained tariff reduction. Manufacturers BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Volkswagen and Volvo, which generate a significant share of their sales in the United States, will have to absorb substantial additional costs. The machinery and equipment sector, including $37 billion in imported medical instruments, also remains under pressure.

European retaliation arsenal on hold

Brussels maintains a substantial arsenal of retaliatory measures in reserve. Beyond the 21 billion euros in countermeasures suspended until August 6, the Commission has prepared a second series of tariffs targeting 72 billion euros worth of American products, including 11 billion euros in aircraft and parts, as well as emblematic products like bourbon, jeans and Harley-Davidson motorcycles. The anti-coercion instrument, considered the EU’s commercial nuclear option, remains on the negotiating table with growing support from member states for its potential deployment.

The American executive order of July 31 confirming the application of the 15% tariff from August 8 establishes that this rate includes existing most-favored-nation rates, thus avoiding tariff stacking beyond the 15% ceiling. This measure offers immediate tariff relief compared to the duties announced on April 2, but nevertheless represents a historic increase in the average American effective tariff rate to 18.3%, the highest level since 1934.

Negotiations continue in a context where the American trade deficit with the EU reached $235.6 billion in 2024. Uncertainties persist notably on the concrete implementation modalities of European financial commitments and the actual duration of the agreement beyond the initial six-month suspension. The risk of Chinese export diversion to the European market and increased fragmentation of global supply chains add additional complexity to the transatlantic trade equation.

Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Brazil adopts new rules allowing immediate commercial measures to counter the U.S. decision to impose an exceptional 50% customs tariff on all Brazilian exports, threatening stability in bilateral trade valued at billions of dollars.
Several international agencies have echoed warnings by Teresa Ribera, Vice-President of the European Commission, about commercial risks related to Chinese competition, emphasizing the EU's refusal to engage in a price war.
The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development lends €400 million to JSC Energocom to diversify Moldova's gas and electricity supply, historically dependent on Russian imports via Ukraine.
BRICS adopt a joint financial framework aimed at supporting emerging economies while criticizing European carbon border tax mechanisms, deemed discriminatory and risky for their strategic trade relations.
The European Commission is launching an alliance with member states and industrial players to secure the supply of critical chemicals, amid growing competition from the United States and China.