OPEC+ faces strategic choices to stabilize the oil market in 2024

Amid weakened global demand, the rise of U.S. shale oil, and internal divisions, OPEC+ seeks to preserve its influence on prices while adapting its production strategy.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

The OPEC+ meeting, initially scheduled for December 1, has been postponed to December 5, reflecting growing tensions within the alliance. At stake: balancing the maintenance of production quotas with the need to respond to increasingly complex market conditions. With Brent prices hovering between $70 and $75 per barrel—far below the…

The OPEC+ meeting, initially scheduled for December 1, has been postponed to December 5, reflecting growing tensions within the alliance. At stake: balancing the maintenance of production quotas with the need to respond to increasingly complex market conditions.

With Brent prices hovering between $70 and $75 per barrel—far below the ideal $80—the 22 members of the alliance face difficult decisions. Extending current cuts or implementing adjustments may be necessary to contain surpluses and counter weak global demand.

A saturated market and strategic divergences

Since 2022, OPEC+ has relied on a supply scarcity strategy, producing around 41 million barrels per day (b/d), compared to a real capacity of 47 million, according to Francis Perrin, Director of Research at the French Institute of International Relations (IFRI). However, this policy struggles to sustain prices effectively, particularly due to increasing volumes produced outside the cartel.

In the United States, where shale oil dominates, the competitive logic of private companies drives massive production. Consequently, the share of U.S. crude oil in global production has risen from 11% in 2016 to 16% in 2024. During the same period, the share of OPEC countries fell from 62% to 56%, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA).

This context fuels internal divisions within OPEC+. Some members, such as the United Arab Emirates and Kazakhstan, advocate for increased production to fund economic projects. In contrast, countries like Saudi Arabia and Russia favor caution to avoid another price collapse.

China and slowing demand

China’s economy, traditionally a key driver of global oil demand, is experiencing a slowdown marked by sluggish consumption and a major real estate crisis. This situation contributes to weak prices and limits short-term recovery prospects.

Oil demand growth forecasts reflect this uncertainty. While OPEC predicts an increase of 1.82 million b/d in 2024, the IEA is more conservative, estimating just 920,000 b/d.

Challenges for OPEC+ and the rise of alternatives

The rise of non-OPEC producers, particularly in the U.S., undermines the alliance’s efforts to stabilize the market. The pro-fossil fuel stance of President-elect Donald Trump reinforces this dynamic, with a clear intention to boost domestic production.

In these conditions, OPEC+ seeks to balance its strategy between maintaining cuts to support prices and avoiding further market share losses. However, as Jorge Leon of Rystad Energy points out, this approach is not sustainable in the long term. The gradual erosion of oil rents jeopardizes the economic modernization of several cartel members.

To counter these challenges, OPEC+ has started sending signals to U.S. shale producers, suggesting it could reopen the taps at any time. This threat aims to limit investments in new projects, as analysts anticipate WTI and Brent prices to hover around $60 in 2025.

The suspension of 1,400 MW of electricity supplied by Iran to Iraq puts pressure on the Iraqi grid, while Tehran records a record 77 GW demand and must balance domestic consumption with regional obligations.
Beijing opposes the possible return of European trio sanctions against Iran, as the nuclear deal deadline approaches and diplomatic tensions rise around Tehran.
Around 80 Russian technical standards for oil and gas have been internationally validated, notably by the United Arab Emirates, Algeria and Oman, according to the Institute of Oil and Gas Technological Initiatives.
Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
The two countries end 37 years of conflict with a 43-kilometer corridor under American control for 99 years. The infrastructure will transport 50 million tons of goods annually by 2030.
A senior official from the UN agency begins technical discussions with Iran on Monday, the first meeting since June strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push BrasĂ­lia toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Consent Preferences