Jordan: Refusal to sign energy agreement with Israel

Jordan announces the cancellation of an energy agreement with Israel, citing the current conflict in Gaza as the main reason.

Share:

Accord annulé tensions exacerbées

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

In an international context marked by growing tensions, Jordan recently took a significant decision concerning its diplomatic and trade relations. Jordan’s Foreign Minister, Ayman Safadi, said in an interview with Al-Jazeera that his country will not proceed with the signing of a previously envisaged energy agreement with Israel. This decision comes against a backdrop of heightened tensions due to the current situation in the Gaza Strip.

Implications of the Situation in Gaza for Regional Relations

The agreement in question, which involved an exchange of solar energy for water between Jordan and Israel, was originally scheduled to be finalized last month. However, the deterioration in relations between Israel and the Palestinian territories, marked in particular by an escalation in hostilities, has prompted Jordan to reconsider its position. Safadi expressed his discomfort at the idea of signing such an agreement in the current context, questioning the possibility of maintaining normal peaceful relations with Israel in such a climate of tension.

Background to the Energy-Water Agreement

The origins of this agreement date back to November 2021, when a declaration of intent was signed by the two nations in Dubai. Under the aegis of the United States, this agreement was designed to enable Jordan to supply solar energy to Israel, in exchange for desalinated water. This project was part of a regional cooperation program aimed at strengthening economic and environmental ties between the two countries.

Public and diplomatic reactions in Jordan

Jordan, which shares borders with Israel and the West Bank, a Palestinian territory occupied by Israel since 1967, signed a peace treaty with Israel in 1994. Indeed, this treaty, considered a milestone in Israeli-Arab relations, paved the way for increased economic and security cooperation between the two countries. However, recent events have highlighted the fragility inherent in this relationship. Jordan’s decision not to sign the agreement follows a series of demonstrations in Amman, where citizens expressed their solidarity with the Palestinians and demanded the cancellation of the peace treaty with Israel.
The situation was further intensified by the early November recall of the Jordanian ambassador to Israel. However, this diplomatic move was a direct response to Israel’s military offensive in the Gaza Strip, triggered by an attack by the Palestinian Hamas. Moreover, the current context illustrates the complexity of Israeli-Palestinian relations and the difficulty of maintaining regional stability in such a volatile environment.

Jordan’s decision to suspend the signing of the energy agreement with Israel highlights the growing tensions in the region, exacerbated by recent events in Gaza. Indeed, this development raises questions about the future of Israeli-Jordanian relations and the impact of the situation in Gaza on regional stability. What’s more, the current situation ushers in a period of uncertainty and reassessment of alliances and agreements in an already complex region.

Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Consent Preferences