Strategic Alliance Between Russia and Iraq: Stabilizing Oil Prices Through OPEC+

Russia and Iraq strengthen their cooperation within OPEC+ to manage oil price fluctuations. This coordination is crucial for their respective budgets amidst sanctions and heavy reliance on oil revenues.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

Recent discussions between Vladimir Putin and Mohammed Shia al-Sudani highlight a shared commitment to strengthening cohesion within OPEC+ amid persistent oil market imbalances. This coordination is vital for two key players heavily dependent on oil revenues but constrained by distinct challenges.

Diverging Priorities of Moscow and Baghdad

Russia, burdened by Western sanctions, strives to maintain energy revenues, which account for 42% of its federal budget. With exports redirected primarily to Asia, Moscow applies significant discounts, reducing its effective selling price by about $20 per barrel compared to global market rates.

Iraq, on the other hand, relies on oil revenues for 90% of its public spending. Each $1/barrel variation impacts its annual budget by $1.4 billion. While Iraq’s low production costs technically enable output adjustments, its pressing fiscal needs and internal stability demands limit flexibility. This makes Baghdad’s support for OPEC+ mechanisms crucial but constrained.

OPEC+ Strategy Amid Uncertainty

In 2023, OPEC+ implemented cumulative production cuts of 3.66 million barrels per day to curb price declines. However, enforcement of these quotas remains uneven. While Russia announced a reduction of 500,000 barrels per day, it has increased exports, particularly of refined products, bypassing its commitments.

Iraq, meanwhile, maintains a cautious stance. Its limited room for further production cuts underscores the challenges of balancing domestic needs with OPEC+’s collective goals. Such internal divergences may complicate future decision-making within the organization.

External Pressures and Structural Constraints

The oil market remains influenced by several external factors, including:

– Global Demand: Slowly recovering, particularly in China, but tempered by restrictive monetary policies in the U.S. and Europe.
– Russian Sanctions: Limiting Moscow’s ability to fully capitalize on price increases, with price caps reducing its leverage.
– Energy Transition: With global demand expected to plateau at 104 million barrels per day by 2030, OPEC+ members must optimize short-term revenues while adapting strategies for a shifting energy landscape.

Implications for Financial Markets

Investors closely monitor OPEC+ decisions, as any quota adjustments directly influence Brent prices and profitability in the energy sector. Strong coordination between Russia and Iraq could stabilize prices around $85/barrel—a critical threshold for ensuring most members’ fiscal needs are met while deterring competition, particularly from U.S. shale producers.

Russia continues hydrocarbon deliveries to India and explores new outlets for liquefied natural gas, amid escalating trade tensions with the United States.
Azerbaijani energy infrastructure targeted in Ukraine raises concerns over the security of gas flows between Baku and Kyiv, just as a new supply agreement has been signed.
The suspension of 1,400 MW of electricity supplied by Iran to Iraq puts pressure on the Iraqi grid, while Tehran records a record 77 GW demand and must balance domestic consumption with regional obligations.
Beijing opposes the possible return of European trio sanctions against Iran, as the nuclear deal deadline approaches and diplomatic tensions rise around Tehran.
The United States plans to collaborate with Pakistan on critical minerals and hydrocarbons, exploring joint ventures and projects in strategic areas such as Balochistan.
Around 80 Russian technical standards for oil and gas have been internationally validated, notably by the United Arab Emirates, Algeria and Oman, according to the Institute of Oil and Gas Technological Initiatives.
Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
The two countries end 37 years of conflict with a 43-kilometer corridor under American control for 99 years. The infrastructure will transport 50 million tons of goods annually by 2030.
A senior official from the UN agency begins technical discussions with Iran on Monday, the first meeting since June strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
Consent Preferences