U.S. elections: Pennsylvania’s shale gas dilemma

Natural gas development in Pennsylvania is becoming a crucial issue in the US presidential elections. Between economic opportunities and environmental concerns, voters are divided, making this topic central to the debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris.

Share:

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles offered per month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 35,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

In the current context of the American presidential elections, the question of natural gas development in Pennsylvania is becoming a central issue.
This territory, known for its vast gas resources and production via hydraulic fracturing, is turning into an ideological battleground between the two main candidates, Donald Trump and Kamala Harris.
Views diverge among the local population, who use economic, political and sometimes personal reasons to choose sides.
The interconnection between the local economy and energy production delights farmers, while the environmental impact raises concerns for others.
The exploitation of shale gas by hydraulic fracturing has enabled Pennsylvania to position itself as a major player on the energy scene, even surpassing renowned producer states such as Qatar in 2022.
This method of extraction, although controversial, is seen by some as a vector of economic prosperity, generating income and opportunities for families who manage agricultural land.
Reflection on these issues raises questions about the sustainability of this industry, particularly at a time when proponents of an alternative energy transition are advocating more environmentally-friendly models.

The opinion divide

The water divide represents a major dilemma for voters.
On the one hand, it generates jobs and financial resources; on the other, it is at the heart of debates concerning public health and environmental preservation.
Opinions within the local population remain divided.
The latest surveys show that 48% of residents express support for gas extraction, against 44% who oppose it.
The balance between economic benefits and environmental concerns continues to fuel heated debate.
Candidates rarely ignore this thorny issue during their campaigns.
During a debate, Donald Trump warned of the risks associated with his opponent’s possible curtailment of shale gas development, asserting that “if Kamala Harris wins the election, hydraulic fracturing in Pennsylvania will be gone from day one”.
This statement is intended to mobilize voters worried about their economic future, while testing his opponent’s responsiveness on an issue that Trump believes could undermine the local economy.

Revealing electoral stakes

The divergence of opinions can also be seen in the testimonies of voters.
Farmer George Wherry, fundamentally committed to hydraulic fracturing, points out that the extra income will enable him to modernize his farm and improve his living conditions.
Laura Jean Kahl, on the other hand, while committed to selling farm produce, mentions her choice for Kamala Harris, in deplorable disagreement with the continuity of these extraction practices, which she considers harmful in the long term.
It’s interesting to note the complexity of opinions and motivations behind these electoral choices.
While some stressed the need to maintain the current economic model, others did not lose sight of the environmental impact of fracking, illustrating the existing tension between the quest for immediate profitability and long-term sustainability.

Implications for the future of energy

Election day in November is approaching, with major consequences for US energy policy.
The ability of candidates to manipulate these issues to suit their local audience could influence their success.
Pennsylvania’s energy context, based on hydraulic fracturing, appears to be a microcosm of the broader debates on energy transition in the United States.
As mobilization for more virtuous energy alternatives gathers momentum at national level, election results could also reshape the US energy landscape, both in terms of legislation and industrial practices.
This election, rooted in immediate economic considerations, could thus turn out to be a decisive turning point for the future of energy in the United States, marking the beginning of a new chapter in the management of natural resources.

Venezuela demands full financial compensation for any gas exports from the offshore Dragon field, reactivated following U.S. authorisation granted to Trinidad and Tobago.
Vistra Corp. finalises the purchase of seven natural gas power plants totalling 2.6 gigawatts, strengthening its presence in key US electricity markets.
Tidewater Midstream and Infrastructure has finalised the sale of its non-core Sylvan Lake site to Parallax Energy Operating for $5.5mn, with limited impact on its 2025 results.
U.S. gas deliveries to Mexico reached 7.5 billion cubic feet per day in May, driven by rising demand in the power sector and new cross-border interconnections.
The Algerian national company has restarted a key liquefaction unit in Skikda, strengthening its export capacity amid massive investment in the gas sector.
Doha and Washington warn Brussels about the consequences of EU sustainability requirements on liquefied natural gas exports, as the continent’s energy security remains under pressure.
The Volans-1X exploration well revealed a 26-metre productive zone in the Orange Basin, marking another hydrocarbon find for Azule Energy partners in 2025.
Faced with the absence of commercially viable results on the Guercif permit, Predator Oil & Gas has initiated a sale process while continuing technical evaluation of the gas potential.
According to the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, a stable gas price of $6/MMBtu would boost global demand by 60 billion m³ in the short term and 120 billion m³ by 2035, mainly driven by Asia.
Kazakhstan’s Karachaganak gas field has reduced output by nearly one-third following an incident at a key Russian gas processing plant targeted by a Ukrainian drone strike.
Kinetiko Energy reports production levels above economic thresholds at two Mpumalanga wells, strengthening the technical viability and development potential of its liquefied natural gas project.
National Fuel Gas Company acquires CenterPoint Energy’s natural gas distribution business in Ohio, doubling the size of its regulated portfolio and expanding its footprint in the US Midwest.
The United States, Canada and Mexico together plan a 151% increase in liquefied natural gas export capacity, representing more than half of expected global additions by 2029.
European Union member states have approved the principle of a full ban on Russian natural gas imports, set to take effect by the end of 2027.
CMA CGM becomes the first international container shipping company to commission LNG-powered ships from an Indian shipyard, all to be registered under the Indian flag.
KLN strengthens its industrial project portfolio with progress on the WHPA platform in Libya, a major offshore site valued at over HK$10bn ($1.28bn), aimed at supporting regional gas supply.
US LNG producer Venture Global will report its Q3 2025 financial results before markets open, followed by a conference call for investors.
NextDecade confirmed a final investment decision for Train 5 at Rio Grande LNG, backed by full $6.7bn funding, marking its second decision in a month.
Sudan seeks partnership with Belarus to rehabilitate its energy grid amid prolonged humanitarian, economic and logistical crisis.
The Malaysian group launched three tenders to sell up to five liquefied natural gas cargoes in November and December, sourced from its Bintulu and PFLNG Dua facilities.

All the latest energy news, all the time

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.