U.S. elections: Pennsylvania’s shale gas dilemma

Natural gas development in Pennsylvania is becoming a crucial issue in the US presidential elections. Between economic opportunities and environmental concerns, voters are divided, making this topic central to the debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris.

Partagez:

In the current context of the American presidential elections, the question of natural gas development in Pennsylvania is becoming a central issue.
This territory, known for its vast gas resources and production via hydraulic fracturing, is turning into an ideological battleground between the two main candidates, Donald Trump and Kamala Harris.
Views diverge among the local population, who use economic, political and sometimes personal reasons to choose sides.
The interconnection between the local economy and energy production delights farmers, while the environmental impact raises concerns for others.
The exploitation of shale gas by hydraulic fracturing has enabled Pennsylvania to position itself as a major player on the energy scene, even surpassing renowned producer states such as Qatar in 2022.
This method of extraction, although controversial, is seen by some as a vector of economic prosperity, generating income and opportunities for families who manage agricultural land.
Reflection on these issues raises questions about the sustainability of this industry, particularly at a time when proponents of an alternative energy transition are advocating more environmentally-friendly models.

The opinion divide

The water divide represents a major dilemma for voters.
On the one hand, it generates jobs and financial resources; on the other, it is at the heart of debates concerning public health and environmental preservation.
Opinions within the local population remain divided.
The latest surveys show that 48% of residents express support for gas extraction, against 44% who oppose it.
The balance between economic benefits and environmental concerns continues to fuel heated debate.
Candidates rarely ignore this thorny issue during their campaigns.
During a debate, Donald Trump warned of the risks associated with his opponent’s possible curtailment of shale gas development, asserting that “if Kamala Harris wins the election, hydraulic fracturing in Pennsylvania will be gone from day one”.
This statement is intended to mobilize voters worried about their economic future, while testing his opponent’s responsiveness on an issue that Trump believes could undermine the local economy.

Revealing electoral stakes

The divergence of opinions can also be seen in the testimonies of voters.
Farmer George Wherry, fundamentally committed to hydraulic fracturing, points out that the extra income will enable him to modernize his farm and improve his living conditions.
Laura Jean Kahl, on the other hand, while committed to selling farm produce, mentions her choice for Kamala Harris, in deplorable disagreement with the continuity of these extraction practices, which she considers harmful in the long term.
It’s interesting to note the complexity of opinions and motivations behind these electoral choices.
While some stressed the need to maintain the current economic model, others did not lose sight of the environmental impact of fracking, illustrating the existing tension between the quest for immediate profitability and long-term sustainability.

Implications for the future of energy

Election day in November is approaching, with major consequences for US energy policy.
The ability of candidates to manipulate these issues to suit their local audience could influence their success.
Pennsylvania’s energy context, based on hydraulic fracturing, appears to be a microcosm of the broader debates on energy transition in the United States.
As mobilization for more virtuous energy alternatives gathers momentum at national level, election results could also reshape the US energy landscape, both in terms of legislation and industrial practices.
This election, rooted in immediate economic considerations, could thus turn out to be a decisive turning point for the future of energy in the United States, marking the beginning of a new chapter in the management of natural resources.

In response to rising summer electricity consumption, Egypt signs import agreements covering 290 shipments of liquefied natural gas, involving major international firms, with financial terms adjusted to the country’s economic constraints.
Egyptian fertilizer producers suspended their activities due to reduced imports of Israeli gas, following recent production halts at Israel's Leviathan and Karish gas fields after Israeli strikes in Iran.
A report identifies 130 gas power plant projects in Texas that could raise emissions to 115 million tonnes per year, despite analysts forecasting limited short-term realisation.
Japanese giant JERA will significantly increase its reliance on US liquefied natural gas through major new contracts, reaching 30% of its supplies within roughly ten years.
Sustained growth in U.S. liquefied natural gas exports is leading to significant price increases projected for 2025 and 2026, as supply struggles to keep pace with steadily rising demand, according to recent forecasts.
Shell is expanding its global Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) capacities, primarily targeting markets in Asia and North America, to meet rising demand anticipated by the end of the decade.
Above-average summer temperatures in Asia are significantly boosting demand for American liquefied natural gas, offsetting a potential slowdown in Europe and opening new commercial opportunities for U.S. exporters.
Duke Energy plans a strategic investment in a natural gas power plant in Anderson, marking its first request for new electricity generation in South Carolina in over ten years.
Adnoc Gas commits $5bn to the first phase of its Rich Gas Development project to boost profitability and processing capacity at four strategic sites in the United Arab Emirates.
The European Commission aims to prevent any return of Russian gas via Nord Stream and Nord Stream 2 with a total transaction ban, part of its 18th sanctions package against Moscow.
Argentina expands its capacity around Vaca Muerta as Mexico explores the prospects of exploiting unconventional resources to meet its 2030 energy targets.
Petredec Group begins construction of a gas terminal in Chongoleani, Tanzania, scheduled for commissioning by 2027, to strengthen LPG import and logistics across East Africa.
The liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals market is projected to grow 67% by 2030, driven by global energy demand, liquefaction capacity, and supply diversification strategies.
Subsea7 has secured a subsea installation contract awarded by Shell for the Aphrodite gas project offshore Trinidad and Tobago, with operations scheduled for 2027.
Chinese ethylene producers are betting on a surge in US ethane arrivals in June as Beijing upholds tariff exemptions and bilateral talks resume.
With trading volumes five times higher than all other European markets combined, the Dutch gas hub TTF asserts itself in 2024 as a global benchmark, attracting traders, investors, and speculators far beyond Europe.
Slovakia is calling on the European Commission to regulate gas transit fees as the EU moves toward a ban on Russian imports by 2027.
Underground storage levels across Europe stand at just half capacity, widening the gap with EU winter targets amid intensified global competition for liquefied natural gas (LNG) supplies.
Norwegian group Equinor has sealed a gas supply deal with Centrica, covering nearly 10% of the United Kingdom’s annual demand over ten years.
MCF Energy Ltd. has provided an operational update on the Kinsau-1A well in Lech, Germany, indicating significant progress in preparing drilling operations for the third quarter of 2025.