Mexico relaunches Lakach: a risky bet on offshore gas

Mexico, via Pemex, takes over the Lakach offshore gas project to reduce its dependence on imported gas. Analysts express doubts about the profitability and strategic choices of this development.

Share:

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles offered per month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 35,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

The Lakach project, abandoned in 2016 after a $1.4 billion investment by Petróleos Mexicanos (Pemex), is back at the center of strategic discussions in the Mexican energy sector.
Seeking to reduce its dependence on gas imported from the USA, Pemex is reactivating this offshore field located 63 kilometers off the coast of Veracruz, with the aim of extracting nearly 1 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of gas by 2041.
However, industry experts point to the considerable challenges associated with deepwater projects, and the lack of clear profitability for this field.

Major challenges for a modest deposit

Lakach, with estimated reserves of less than 1 Tcf, is considered a relatively modest project on a global scale.
Most offshore gas projects have much larger reserves, sometimes reaching up to 10 Tcf.
This small size calls into question the economic viability of Lakach as a stand-alone project.
According to Pedro Martinez of S&P Global Commodity Insights, the offshore context in Mexico is complex, due to a lack of infrastructure and a history of mixed results for Pemex in this area.
The business model chosen for Lakach is also criticized.
Rather than liquefying the gas for export to higher-priced markets, Pemex plans to transport it onshore for domestic use.
This could mean selling the gas at uncompetitive prices, nearly three times the cost of importing U.S. gas, according to analysis by Rodrigo Rosas of Wood Mackenzie.
This strategic choice could lead to subsidies that would weigh on the company’s finances.

The contractual model and financial risks

Pemex’s partnership with Grupo Carso to relaunch Lakach also raises questions.
This model is based on a service contract rather than an operating partnership, which transfers most of the financial risk to Pemex without offering solid production guarantees.
The initial agreement with New Fortress Energy, which was cancelled shortly after it was signed, testifies to the uncertainties surrounding this type of contract.
Miriam Grunstein of Brilliant Energy Consulting points out that this approach is similar to the business models used in the past, where lack of transparency and restrictive conditions favored a limited number of economic players.
This could hinder more efficient and diversified development opportunities for the Mexican gas sector.

Limited prospects for reducing dependence on imported gas

At peak production, Lakach could reach around 200 million cubic feet per day (MMcf/d), a marginal amount compared to Mexico’s daily natural gas consumption of over 9 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d).
The project could reduce dependence on US gas imports by just 2%, a minor impact given the operating costs and investment required.
Experts believe that alternatives, such as the development of field clusters, including Kunah and Piklis, located near Lakach, could offer better optimization of available resources.
However, these fields still require geological evaluation and substantial investment.
The economic outlook for deepwater natural gas remains uncertain, especially in a global context where lower-cost sources of gas are widely available.
Pemex’s current strategy for Lakach is likely to result in a loss-making project in the long term, highlighting the company’s persistent difficulties in balancing its energy ambitions with the economic realities of the market.

Argentinian consortium Southern Energy will supply up to two million tonnes of LNG per year to Germany’s Sefe, marking the first South American alliance for the European importer.
The UK government has ended its financial support for TotalEnergies' liquefied natural gas project in Mozambique, citing increased risks and a lack of national interest in continuing its involvement.
Faced with a climate- and geopolitically-constrained winter, Beijing announces expected record demand for electricity and gas, placing coal, LNG and UHV grids at the centre of a national energy stress test.
The Iraqi government and Kurdish authorities have launched an investigation into the drone attack targeting the Khor Mor gas field, which halted production and caused widespread electricity outages.
PetroChina internalises three major gas storage sites through two joint ventures with PipeChina, representing 11 Gm³ of capacity, in a CNY40.02bn ($5.43bn) deal consolidating control over its domestic gas network.
The European Union is facilitating the use of force majeure to exit Russian gas contracts by 2028, a risky strategy for companies still bound by strict legal clauses.
Amid an expected LNG surplus from 2026, investors are reallocating positions toward the EU carbon market, betting on tighter supply and a bullish price trajectory.
Axiom Oil and Gas is suing Tidewater Midstream for $110mn over a gas handling dispute tied to a property for sale in the Brazeau region, with bids due this week.
Tokyo Gas has signed a 20-year agreement with US-based Venture Global to purchase one million tonnes per year of liquefied natural gas starting in 2030, reinforcing energy flows between Japan and the United States.
Venture Global accuses Shell of deliberately harming its operations over three years amid a conflict over spot market liquefied natural gas sales outside long-term contracts.
TotalEnergies ends operations of its Le Havre floating LNG terminal, installed after the 2022 energy crisis, due to its complete inactivity since August 2024.
Golar LNG has completed a $1.2bn refinancing for its floating LNG unit Gimi, securing extended financing terms and releasing net liquidity to strengthen its position in the liquefied natural gas market.
Woodside Energy and East Timor have reached an agreement to assess the commercial viability of a 5 million-tonne liquefied natural gas project from the Greater Sunrise field, with first exports targeted between 2032 and 2035.
In California, electricity production from natural gas is falling as solar continues to rise, especially between noon and 5 p.m., according to 2025 data from local grid authorities.
NextDecade has launched the pre-filing procedure to expand Rio Grande LNG with a sixth train, leveraging a political and commercial context favourable to US liquefied natural gas exports.
Condor Energies has completed drilling its first horizontal well in Uzbekistan, supported by two recompletions that increased daily production to 11,844 barrels of oil equivalent.
WhiteWater expands the Eiger Express pipeline in Texas, boosting its transport capacity to 3.7 billion cubic feet per day following new long-term contractual commitments.
The challenge to permits granted for the NESE project revives tensions between gas supply imperatives and regulatory consistency, as legal risks mount for regulators and developers.
Brasilia is preparing a regulatory overhaul of the LPG sector to break down entry barriers in a market dominated by Petrobras and four major distributors, as the Gás do Povo social programme intensifies pressure on prices.
The lifting of force majeure on the Rovuma LNG project puts Mozambique back on the global liquefied natural gas map, with a targeted capacity of 18 Mt/year and a narrowing strategic window to secure financing.

All the latest energy news, all the time

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.