Completion of the “Power of Siberia” Gas Pipeline: Strategic Implications for Russia and China

Russia and China complete the "Power of Siberia" gas pipeline six months ahead of schedule. This strategic infrastructure, designed to transport 38 billion cubic meters per year, is reshaping Eurasian energy and economic dynamics.

Share:

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles offered per month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 35,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

The completion of the “Power of Siberia” gas pipeline, connecting Russia to China, marks a significant milestone in bilateral energy cooperation and reflects current geopolitical and economic dynamics in Eurasia. Spanning over 8,000 kilometers, this project has been delivered six months ahead of its initial schedule.

The pipeline, set to become fully operational by the end of 2024, will enable Russia to supply 38 billion cubic meters of natural gas annually to China’s eastern provinces. The scale of this infrastructure makes it a strategic lever for both powers amidst international tensions and the reconfiguration of global energy flows.

A Strategic Issue for Moscow and Beijing

The “Power of Siberia” gas pipeline is a cornerstone in Russia’s energy strategy. As Western sanctions limit access to European markets, Russia is redirecting its exports toward Asia, particularly China, the world’s largest natural gas importer. This project highlights Moscow’s ability to secure stable outlets through long-term contracts with Beijing.

For China, this infrastructure addresses several strategic objectives:
– Diversifying energy supply sources to reduce coal dependency and strengthen energy security.
– Supporting the growing demand for natural gas, especially in industrial and urban regions.
– Aligning with the energy transition policy aimed at reducing CO₂ emissions.

Technical Features and Performance

The project relies on robust infrastructure:
– **Supply sources**: Chayandinskoye and Kovykta gas fields in eastern Siberia, rich in conventional gas.
– **Annual capacity**: Up to 38 billion cubic meters of gas, representing about 9% of China’s current annual consumption.
– **Integrated network**: Compression stations and secondary pipelines to optimize distribution across Chinese provinces.

Operational efficiency depends on technical innovations that enable the transport of gas over long distances with minimal losses, despite extreme climatic conditions in Siberia.

Geopolitical Consequences

This project strengthens the Moscow-Beijing axis in a globally polarized context. For Russia, the gas pipeline is a resilience tool against sanctions, diversifying its markets. China finds in it a means to reduce reliance on traditional liquefied natural gas (LNG) suppliers, such as Qatar or Australia.

However, this energy interdependence carries risks. A potential deterioration of bilateral relations could affect commercial terms, particularly price negotiations. Moreover, Beijing ensures not to depend exclusively on Moscow, diversifying its supplies through partnerships with LNG players like the United States.

Outlook and Challenges

Expansion is already planned with the “Power of Siberia 2” project, designed to link western Siberian gas fields to China via Mongolia. This new pipeline could double gas volumes delivered and further bolster Russia’s energy influence in Asia.

Nevertheless, environmental and logistical constraints remain:
– The ecological impact of gas extraction in Siberia, as well as criticism regarding encroachment on sensitive territories.
– Logistical challenges related to maintaining and securing such a vast infrastructure in remote regions.

For both partners, the success of this project fits into a shared vision of reconfiguring global energy flows, with Eurasia increasingly integrated on the energy and economic front.

McDermott has signed a contract amendment with Golden Pass LNG Terminal to complete Trains 2 and 3 of the liquefied natural gas export terminal in Texas, continuing its role as lead partner on the project.
Exxon Mobil will acquire a 40% stake in the Bahia pipeline and co-finance its expansion to transport up to 1 million barrels per day of natural gas liquids from the Permian Basin.
The German state is multiplying LNG infrastructure projects in the North Sea and the Baltic Sea to secure supplies, with five floating terminals under public supervision under development.
Aramco has signed 17 new memoranda of understanding with U.S. companies, covering LNG, advanced materials and financial services, with a potential value exceeding $30 billion.
The Slovak government is reviewing a potential lawsuit against the European Commission following its decision to end Russian gas deliveries by 2028, citing serious economic harm to the country.
The European Union is extending its gas storage regime, keeping a legal 90% target but widening national leeway on timing and filling volumes to reduce the price pressure from mandatory obligations.
The Mozambican government has initiated a review of the expenses incurred during the five-year suspension of TotalEnergies' gas project, halted due to an armed insurgency in the country’s north.
The number of active drilling rigs in the continental United States continues to decline while oil and natural gas production reaches historic levels, driven by operational efficiency gains.
Shell sells a 50% stake in Tobermory West of Shetland to Ithaca Energy, while retaining operatorship, reinforcing a partnership already tested on Tornado, amid high fiscal pressure and regulatory uncertainty in the North Sea.
Russian company Novatek applied major discounts on its liquefied natural gas cargoes to attract Chinese buyers, reviving sales from the Arctic LNG 2 project under Western sanctions.
A first vessel chartered by a Ukrainian trader delivered American liquefied gas to Lithuania, marking the opening of a new maritime supply route ahead of the winter season.
A German NGO has filed in France a complaint against TotalEnergies for alleged war crimes complicity around Mozambique LNG, just as the country seeks to restart this key gas project without any judicial decision yet on the substance.
Hut 8 transfers four natural gas power plants to TransAlta following a turnaround plan and five-year capacity contracts secured in Ontario.
By selling its US subsidiary TVL LLC, active in the Haynesville and Cotton Valley formations in Louisiana, to Grayrock Energy for $255mn, Tokyo Gas pursues a targeted rotation of its upstream assets while strengthening, through TG Natural Resources, its exposure to major US gas hubs supporting its LNG value chain.
TotalEnergies acquires 50% of a flexible power generation portfolio from EPH, reinforcing its gas-to-power strategy in Europe through a €10.6bn joint venture.
The Essington-1 well identified significant hydrocarbon columns in the Otway Basin, strengthening investment prospects for the partners in the drilling programme.
New Delhi secures 2.2 million tonnes of liquefied petroleum gas annually from the United States, a state-funded commitment amid American sanctions and shifting supply strategies.
INNIO and Clarke Energy are building a 450 MW gas engine power plant in Thurrock to stabilise the electricity grid in southeast England and supply nearly one million households.
Aramco and Yokogawa have completed the deployment of autonomous artificial intelligence agents in the gas processing unit of Fadhili, reducing energy and chemical consumption while limiting human intervention.
S‑Fuelcell is accelerating the launch of its GFOS platform to provide autonomous power to AI data centres facing grid saturation and a continuous rise in energy demand.

All the latest energy news, all the time

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.