Completion of the “Power of Siberia” Gas Pipeline: Strategic Implications for Russia and China

Russia and China complete the "Power of Siberia" gas pipeline six months ahead of schedule. This strategic infrastructure, designed to transport 38 billion cubic meters per year, is reshaping Eurasian energy and economic dynamics.

Share:

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

Annual subscription

8.25£/month*

*billed annually at 99£/year for the first year then 149,00£/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2£/month*
then 14.90£ per month thereafter

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles offered per month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 35,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

The completion of the “Power of Siberia” gas pipeline, connecting Russia to China, marks a significant milestone in bilateral energy cooperation and reflects current geopolitical and economic dynamics in Eurasia. Spanning over 8,000 kilometers, this project has been delivered six months ahead of its initial schedule.

The pipeline, set to become fully operational by the end of 2024, will enable Russia to supply 38 billion cubic meters of natural gas annually to China’s eastern provinces. The scale of this infrastructure makes it a strategic lever for both powers amidst international tensions and the reconfiguration of global energy flows.

A Strategic Issue for Moscow and Beijing

The “Power of Siberia” gas pipeline is a cornerstone in Russia’s energy strategy. As Western sanctions limit access to European markets, Russia is redirecting its exports toward Asia, particularly China, the world’s largest natural gas importer. This project highlights Moscow’s ability to secure stable outlets through long-term contracts with Beijing.

For China, this infrastructure addresses several strategic objectives:
– Diversifying energy supply sources to reduce coal dependency and strengthen energy security.
– Supporting the growing demand for natural gas, especially in industrial and urban regions.
– Aligning with the energy transition policy aimed at reducing CO₂ emissions.

Technical Features and Performance

The project relies on robust infrastructure:
– **Supply sources**: Chayandinskoye and Kovykta gas fields in eastern Siberia, rich in conventional gas.
– **Annual capacity**: Up to 38 billion cubic meters of gas, representing about 9% of China’s current annual consumption.
– **Integrated network**: Compression stations and secondary pipelines to optimize distribution across Chinese provinces.

Operational efficiency depends on technical innovations that enable the transport of gas over long distances with minimal losses, despite extreme climatic conditions in Siberia.

Geopolitical Consequences

This project strengthens the Moscow-Beijing axis in a globally polarized context. For Russia, the gas pipeline is a resilience tool against sanctions, diversifying its markets. China finds in it a means to reduce reliance on traditional liquefied natural gas (LNG) suppliers, such as Qatar or Australia.

However, this energy interdependence carries risks. A potential deterioration of bilateral relations could affect commercial terms, particularly price negotiations. Moreover, Beijing ensures not to depend exclusively on Moscow, diversifying its supplies through partnerships with LNG players like the United States.

Outlook and Challenges

Expansion is already planned with the “Power of Siberia 2” project, designed to link western Siberian gas fields to China via Mongolia. This new pipeline could double gas volumes delivered and further bolster Russia’s energy influence in Asia.

Nevertheless, environmental and logistical constraints remain:
– The ecological impact of gas extraction in Siberia, as well as criticism regarding encroachment on sensitive territories.
– Logistical challenges related to maintaining and securing such a vast infrastructure in remote regions.

For both partners, the success of this project fits into a shared vision of reconfiguring global energy flows, with Eurasia increasingly integrated on the energy and economic front.

With the addition of Nguya FLNG to Tango, Eni secures 3 mtpa of capacity in Congo, locking in non-Russian volumes for Italy and positioning Brazzaville within the ranks of visible African LNG exporters.
Japan’s JERA has signed a liquefied natural gas supply contract with India’s Torrent Power for four cargoes annually from 2027, marking a shift in its LNG portfolio toward South Asia.
The merger of TotalEnergies and Repsol’s UK assets into NEO NEXT+ creates a 250,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day operator, repositioning the majors in response to the UK’s fiscal regime and basin decline.
Climate requirements imposed by the European due diligence directive are complicating trade relations between the European Union and Qatar, jeopardising long-term gas supply as the global LNG market undergoes major shifts.
A report forecasts that improved industrial energy efficiency and residential electrification could significantly reduce Colombia’s need for imported gas by 2030.
Falling rig counts and surging natural gas demand are reshaping the Lower 48 energy landscape, fuelling a rebound in gas-focused mergers and acquisitions.
The Nigerian government has approved a payment of NGN185bn ($128 million) to settle debts owed to gas producers, aiming to secure electricity supply and attract new investments in the energy sector.
Riley Exploration Permian has finalised the sale of its Dovetail Midstream entity to Targa Northern Delaware for $111 million, with an additional conditional payment of up to $60 million. The deal also includes a future transfer of equipment for $10 million.
Stanwell has secured an exclusive agreement with Quinbrook for the development of the Gladstone SDA Energy Hub, combining gas turbines and long-duration battery storage to support Queensland’s electricity grid stability.
The growth of US liquefied natural gas exports could slow if rising domestic costs continue to squeeze margins, as new volumes hit an already saturated global market.
Turkmenistan is leveraging the Global Gas Centre to build commercial links in Europe and South Asia, as it responds to its current dependence on China and a shifting post-Russian gas market.
The Marmara Ereğlisi liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal operated by BOTAŞ is increasing its regasification capacity, consolidating Türkiye’s role as a regional player in gas redistribution toward the Balkans and Southeast Europe.
Budapest contests the European agreement to ban Russian natural gas imports by 2027, claiming the measure is incompatible with its economic interests and the European Union's founding treaties.
The European Union has enshrined in law a complete ban on Russian gas by 2027, forcing utilities, operators, traders and states to restructure contracts, physical flows and supply strategies under strict regulatory pressure.
The partial exploitation of associated gas from the Badila field by Perenco supplies electricity to Moundou, highlighting the logistical and financial challenges of gas development in Chad.
A new regulation requires gas companies to declare the origin, volume and duration of their contracts, as the EU prepares to end Russian imports.
Saudi Aramco has launched production at the unconventional Jafurah gas field, initiating an investment plan exceeding $100bn to substitute domestic crude and increase exportable flows under OPEC+ constraints.
By mobilising long-term contracts with BP and new infrastructure, PLN is driving Indonesia’s shift toward prioritising domestic LNG use, at the centre of a state-backed investment programme supported by international lenders.
TotalEnergies, TES and three Japanese companies will develop an industrial-scale e-gas facility in the United States, targeting 250 MW capacity and 75,000 tonnes of annual output by 2030.
The UK government has ended its financial support for TotalEnergies' liquefied natural gas project in Mozambique, citing increased risks and a lack of national interest in continuing its involvement.

All the latest energy news, all the time

Annual subscription

8.25£/month*

*billed annually at 99£/year for the first year then 149,00£/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2£/month*
then 14.90£ per month thereafter

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.