Tehran rejects French and US threats over its oil exports

Iran responded to threats of sanctions from the United States and France, denouncing what it sees as illegitimate political pressure and reaffirming its stance on the legality of its oil exports.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

Iran stated on Friday that US-imposed sanctions would not alter its policy, calling the measures contrary to international law. This response follows President Donald Trump’s announcement of an immediate tightening of sanctions targeting countries and entities trading with the Islamic Republic in oil and petrochemical products.

In a message posted on the Truth Social platform, the US President ordered that “all purchases of Iranian oil or petrochemical products must stop, NOW,” threatening indirect sanctions on any violators. This directive is part of the US administration’s “maximum pressure” strategy aimed at restricting the Iranian government’s economic resources.

Tensions heightened by France’s position

Meanwhile, French Minister of Foreign Affairs Jean-Noël Barrot stated that European powers would reinstate the sanctions lifted under the 2015 agreement if Iran did not undertake a “marked, verifiable, and robust rollback” of its nuclear programme. This position was expressed following a meeting in Washington with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

The spokesperson for Iran’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Esmaeil Baqaei, responded by denouncing these as “open threats” and warned that such remarks reinforced the perception that “France risks shifting into the role of a spoiler.” Iran also announced the cancellation of a planned meeting with representatives from France, the United Kingdom and Germany, following the postponement of bilateral talks with the United States.

Nuclear agreement still on hold

The multilateral framework established under the 2015 agreement—signed with France, Germany, the United Kingdom, China, and Russia—officially remains in force until October 2025. The deal provided for a reduction in Iran’s nuclear capabilities in exchange for the lifting of international sanctions. However, its effectiveness has been significantly undermined by the US withdrawal in 2018 under Donald Trump’s first term.

Talks between Iran and the United States were expected to continue this week but were postponed for logistical reasons, according to the Omani mediator. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi stated that Tehran remains willing to conclude a “fair and balanced agreement,” provided it guarantees the lifting of sanctions.

Potential impact on export channels

Rising tensions between Iran and Western powers are creating an atmosphere of uncertainty for oil markets, particularly for buyers in Asia, Africa and the Eastern Mediterranean. New threats of secondary sanctions may force energy sector players to revise their procurement strategies.

Iran has not announced any immediate adjustments to its export channels but continues to stress the legal legitimacy of its commercial activities. No specific information has been provided regarding potential countermeasures in response to tightening US restrictions or European warnings.

Azerbaijani energy infrastructure targeted in Ukraine raises concerns over the security of gas flows between Baku and Kyiv, just as a new supply agreement has been signed.
The suspension of 1,400 MW of electricity supplied by Iran to Iraq puts pressure on the Iraqi grid, while Tehran records a record 77 GW demand and must balance domestic consumption with regional obligations.
Beijing opposes the possible return of European trio sanctions against Iran, as the nuclear deal deadline approaches and diplomatic tensions rise around Tehran.
The United States plans to collaborate with Pakistan on critical minerals and hydrocarbons, exploring joint ventures and projects in strategic areas such as Balochistan.
Around 80 Russian technical standards for oil and gas have been internationally validated, notably by the United Arab Emirates, Algeria and Oman, according to the Institute of Oil and Gas Technological Initiatives.
Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
The two countries end 37 years of conflict with a 43-kilometer corridor under American control for 99 years. The infrastructure will transport 50 million tons of goods annually by 2030.
A senior official from the UN agency begins technical discussions with Iran on Monday, the first meeting since June strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
Consent Preferences