Time is running out for a nuclear deal, warns IAEA head in Tehran

The Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Rafael Grossi, emphasised the urgency of reaching a deal on Iran's nuclear programme before crucial negotiations scheduled this weekend in Rome.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

Rafael Grossi, Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), expressed, on April 17, 2025, the urgency of reaching a deal on Iran’s nuclear programme, as crucial negotiations between Iran and the United States are scheduled for Saturday in Rome. The IAEA, based in Vienna, is responsible for verifying Iran’s compliance with its international obligations regarding its nuclear programme, a field where tensions remain high.

The United States, Israel, and several European countries accuse Iran of seeking to develop nuclear weapons, although Tehran denies these accusations, insisting on its right to enrich uranium for peaceful civilian purposes, particularly for energy production. The main point of contention lies in Iran’s ability to enrich uranium to levels close to those necessary for the manufacturing of nuclear weapons, with significant stockpiles accumulated by the country.

A Crucial Negotiation Process

During his visit to Tehran, Grossi stated that the situation was “at a crucial stage,” emphasising that there was little time before discussions reached a point of no return. The IAEA plays a central role in these talks, both as a technical mediator and as the entity overseeing Iran’s compliance. Grossi met with Mohammad Eslami, Iran’s head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI), but no details were given about the discussions that took place.

Negotiations between Iran and the United States, mediated by Oman, began last week. A key issue in the talks remains Iran’s stance on halting its nuclear programme, a “red line” for the Iranian government.

Geopolitical Impacts and International Pressure

The discussions are set against a tense geopolitical backdrop, where Russia, a signatory of the 2015 nuclear deal, also plays a crucial role. Although the agreement has fallen into disuse following the United States’ withdrawal in 2018, it remains an important framework for nuclear diplomacy. The US president recently warned against military escalation while calling for negotiations. However, an important aspect of the diplomacy is also marked by military tensions, with Israel having been dissuaded by Washington from striking nuclear facilities in Iran.

Meanwhile, Iran continues to face diplomatic pressure from its neighbours, notably Saudi Arabia, which recently sent its Defence Minister to Tehran.

A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Brazil adopts new rules allowing immediate commercial measures to counter the U.S. decision to impose an exceptional 50% customs tariff on all Brazilian exports, threatening stability in bilateral trade valued at billions of dollars.
Consent Preferences