The Controversial Role of Fossil Fuels at COP29: A Transition or Lobbying Issue?

COP29 in Baku highlights the massive presence of fossil fuel representatives. Between lobbying and energy necessity, the debate on their role in the climate transition intensifies.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

The Conference of the Parties on Climate, or COP29, hosted this year by Azerbaijan, has sparked heated debates over the role of fossil fuel actors. With nearly 1,800 representatives identified among participants, their influence on climate discussions is under scrutiny by NGOs and activists. At this conference, dozens of energy-related…

The Conference of the Parties on Climate, or COP29, hosted this year by Azerbaijan, has sparked heated debates over the role of fossil fuel actors. With nearly 1,800 representatives identified among participants, their influence on climate discussions is under scrutiny by NGOs and activists.

At this conference, dozens of energy-related events were held from the first day. Among the speakers were energy ministers from Kazakhstan and the United States, the CEO of TotalEnergies, and carbon market entrepreneurs. All positioned themselves as essential players in the energy transition.

Lobbying Accusations: A Barrier to Climate Progress?

Criticism is mounting against COP29, particularly from non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that denounce the growing influence of lobbying. A symbolic installation of a giant snake at the conference entrance underscored this mistrust. Activists like Makoma Lekalakala from EarthLife are calling for an immediate end to what they call “energy colonialism.”

Other influential voices, such as former U.S. Vice President Al Gore, expressed concerns. He pointed out Azerbaijan’s greenhouse gas emissions and criticized the control of negotiations by fossil fuel companies.

A Debate Between Necessity and Transition

Patrick Pouyanné, CEO of TotalEnergies, acknowledged that the fossil fuel industry is “part of the problem” while emphasizing his company’s continuous efforts to reduce its environmental impact. The company collaborates with Socar, Azerbaijan’s national oil company, to exploit a gas field in the Caspian Sea, illustrating the dual role of oil majors: both accused of slowing down the climate transition and considered indispensable partners.

The conference also featured discussions on climate financing. Negotiators are struggling to agree on the modalities to mobilize $1 trillion annually for developing countries. A draft text is awaited to clarify the divergent positions.

Perspectives for Future COPs

Despite criticism, notable progress has been made in previous editions, such as COP28’s agreement to gradually phase out fossil fuels. However, activists fear that the massive presence of lobbyists will slow this progress.

As ministers join negotiations next week, the challenge remains: reconciling the demands of energy transition with the economic interests of major energy powers. The outcomes of COP29 will determine whether this summit marks a decisive turning point or another step in a process deemed “too slow” by many participants.

The suspension of 1,400 MW of electricity supplied by Iran to Iraq puts pressure on the Iraqi grid, while Tehran records a record 77 GW demand and must balance domestic consumption with regional obligations.
Beijing opposes the possible return of European trio sanctions against Iran, as the nuclear deal deadline approaches and diplomatic tensions rise around Tehran.
Around 80 Russian technical standards for oil and gas have been internationally validated, notably by the United Arab Emirates, Algeria and Oman, according to the Institute of Oil and Gas Technological Initiatives.
Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
The two countries end 37 years of conflict with a 43-kilometer corridor under American control for 99 years. The infrastructure will transport 50 million tons of goods annually by 2030.
A senior official from the UN agency begins technical discussions with Iran on Monday, the first meeting since June strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Consent Preferences