Washington threatens sanctions against countries supporting global maritime carbon tax

The United States has threatened economic sanctions against International Maritime Organization members who approve a global carbon tax on international shipping emissions.

Share:

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

Annual subscription

8.25€/month*

*billed annually at 99€/year for the first year then 149,00€/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2€/month*
then 14.90€ per month thereafter

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles offered per month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 35,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

US authorities have warned they will take retaliatory measures against any country supporting an international carbon tax on maritime transport. This announcement comes just days ahead of a crucial vote within the International Maritime Organization (IMO), where members are set to decide on a proposal to implement a global carbon levy on ship emissions.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio, along with the Secretaries of Energy and Transportation, described the proposed measure as “neo-colonial” in a statement. Washington asserts that the implementation of such a fiscal mechanism on carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions — referred to by the acronym NZF — would harm US economic interests and negatively impact supply chains and consumers.

Anticipated economic repercussions

US officials estimate the tax could raise shipping costs by 10% or more. Authorities claim that such a levy on carbon emissions would directly affect shipping companies, energy suppliers and importers, leading to price increases for citizens and businesses.

The NZF tax proposal would be the first global fiscal mechanism adopted by a United Nations agency, according to the statement. The London-based IMO oversees international shipping regulations and aims to reduce the sector’s total emissions in line with its environmental goals.

A stance aligned with current US policy

Since returning to power, President Donald Trump has reoriented US energy policy in favour of fossil fuels, rolling back multiple international climate commitments. The White House withdrew from the Paris Agreement and enacted a series of deregulation measures aimed at supporting the oil, gas and coal industries.

This shift has resulted in growing hostility toward multilateral initiatives perceived as burdensome to the US economy. At the United Nations, President Trump previously described climate change as “the greatest scam” in history, rejecting scientific consensus and advocating for complete economic sovereignty.

Targeted economic sanctions under consideration

Among the measures under consideration are visa restrictions and increased port fees for vessels owned by or registered in countries supporting the carbon tax. These steps are intended to discourage any endorsement of a system the US considers imposed without its consent.

“We will fight fiercely to protect our economic interests,” the statement’s signatories declared, reaffirming the United States’ strong opposition to any international carbon tax applied across the global commercial fleet.

The German regulator is preparing a reform favourable to grid operators, aiming to adjust returns and efficiency rules from 2028 for gas pipelines and 2029 for electricity networks.
Bill Gates urges governments and investors to prioritise adaptation to warming effects, advocating for increased funding in health and development across vulnerable countries.
The Malaysian government plans to increase public investment in natural gas and solar energy to reduce coal dependency while ensuring energy cost stability for households and businesses.
The study by Özlem Onaran and Cem Oyvat highlights structural limits in public climate finance, underscoring the need for closer alignment with social and economic goals to strengthen the efficiency and resilience of public spending.
Oil major ExxonMobil is challenging two California laws requiring disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions and climate risks, arguing that the mandates violate freedom of speech.
The European Court of Human Rights ruled that Norway’s deferral of a climate impact assessment did not breach procedural safeguards under the Convention, upholding the country’s 2016 oil licensing decisions.
Singapore strengthens its energy strategy through public investments in nuclear, regional electricity interconnections and gas infrastructure to secure its long-term supply.
As oil production declines, Gabon is relying on regulatory reforms and large-scale investments to build a new growth framework focused on local transformation and industrialisation.
Cameroon will adopt a customs exemption on industrial equipment related to biofuels starting in 2026, as part of its new energy strategy aimed at regulating a still underdeveloped sector.
Facing a persistent fuel shortage and depleted foreign reserves, the Bolivian parliament has passed an exceptional law allowing private actors to import gasoline, diesel and LPG tax-free for three months.
Ghana aims to secure $16 billion in oil revenues over ten years, but the continued drop in production raises doubts about the sector’s long-term stability.
The government of Kinshasa has signed a memorandum of understanding with Vietnam's Vingroup to develop a 6,300-hectare urban project and modernise mobility through an electric transport network.
ERCOT’s grid adapts to record electricity consumption by relying on the growth of solar, wind and battery storage to maintain system stability.
The French government will raise the energy savings certificate budget by 27% in 2026, leveraging more private funds to support thermal renovation and electric mobility.
Facing opposition criticism, Monique Barbut asserts that France’s energy sovereignty relies on a strategy combining civil nuclear power and renewable energy.
The European Commission is reviving efforts to abolish daylight saving time, supported by several member states, as the energy savings from the practice are now considered negligible.
Rising responses to UNEP’s satellite alerts trigger measurement, reporting and verification clauses; the European Union sets import milestones, Japan strengthens liquefied natural gas traceability; operators and steelmakers adjust budgets and contracts.
The Finance Committee has adopted an amendment to overhaul electricity pricing by removing the planned redistribution mechanism and capping producers' profit margins.
The European Commission unveils a seven-point action plan aimed at lowering energy costs, targeting energy-intensive industries and households facing persistently high utility bills.
The European Commission plans to keep energy at the heart of its 2026 agenda, with several structural reforms targeting market security, governance and simplification.

All the latest energy news, all the time

Annual subscription

8.25€/month*

*billed annually at 99€/year for the first year then 149,00€/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2€/month*
then 14.90€ per month thereafter

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.