Ukraine interrupts Russian gas transit: immediate impact for Europe

Ukraine is terminating its gas transit contract with Gazprom from December 31, 2024, a move that will disrupt energy flows to Europe and heighten geopolitical tensions.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

Ukraine has decided not to renew the agreement signed in 2019 with Gazprom, which allowed the transit of Russian gas through its territory.
This contract, essential for gas supplies to several European countries, expires on December 31, 2024.
The quantity of gas transported by Ukraine, already in decline with only 14 billion cubic meters delivered in 2023, is likely to cease altogether, forcing the countries concerned to seek immediate alternatives.
This decision comes at a time when the European Union, although aiming for energy independence from Russia by 2027, is still dependent on these deliveries to meet the energy needs of certain member states.
For Austria, Hungary and Slovakia, this change represents a considerable challenge, both in terms of security of supply and costs.

Economic consequences and logistical challenges

Ukraine’s decision could further disrupt a market already under stress.
European consumers could face higher prices, increasing costs for local industries.
Anticipating this scenario, Russia is turning to China and considering expanding its gas infrastructure in Turkey to compensate for the loss of the European market.
Volodymyr Zelensky, President of Ukraine, says his country is exploring alternative solutions, including agreements with Azerbaijan.
However, transporting Azerbaijani gas poses major logistical challenges, given the absence of a common border between the two countries.
Transit via Russia would still be necessary, further complicating the situation.

Geopolitical and strategic implications

This decision is part of a wider Ukrainian strategy to reduce its energy dependence on Russia.
The recent capture by Ukrainian forces of the town of Soudja, a strategic point for the transit of gas to Europe, testifies to the intensity of the current confrontations.
This situation could not only interrupt gas deliveries, but also complicate the European Union’s efforts to maintain a diversity of energy supply sources.
Discussions with Azerbaijan demonstrate the efforts being made by European and Ukrainian players to find alternative solutions.
However, the complexity of the geopolitical situation makes these discussions difficult, and uncertainty about the future of gas supplies remains.

Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Consent Preferences