Trump’s plan to accelerate energy projects threatened by legal challenges

Trump's potential return to the "Schedule F" measure could ease energy project approvals but risks legal delays due to the replacement of technical experts with political appointees.

Share:

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles offered per month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 35,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

Former President Donald Trump’s ambition to streamline energy project approvals is centered on a controversial plan to overhaul the federal civil service. At the heart of this plan is the reinstatement of “Schedule F,” a measure introduced during his first term, which would allow the dismissal of thousands of federal employees and replace technical experts with political appointees, potentially impacting the permit review process, particularly under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).

Schedule F, a federal employment category introduced by a Trump executive order in October 2020, would strip traditional protections from career civil servants. The goal is to expedite decisions on major infrastructure projects, especially in the energy sector. However, federal permitting experts warn that this acceleration could lead to further delays, primarily due to potential legal challenges.

Technical expertise replaced by political appointees

Nikki Chiappa, director of the permitting program at the Breakthrough Institute, points out that replacing NEPA review specialists with politically appointed individuals who lack technical expertise could make environmental assessments more vulnerable to lawsuits. According to Chiappa, the quality of reviews could decline, making these projects more susceptible to prolonged legal delays.

The Schedule F program could also result in a loss of talent among federal experts, further increasing the workload for the few remaining specialists. This situation risks undermining the speed of approvals, a key objective of Trump’s strategy.

Impacts on renewable energy projects

While Trump has shown support for mining and fossil fuel projects, his frequent criticisms of renewable energy, particularly wind power, are well documented. Should Schedule F be reinstated, the appointment of politically aligned individuals could slow down green energy projects, including those backed by the Biden administration, such as offshore wind and solar initiatives.

The “Project 2025” report, authored by the Heritage Foundation, supports this approach by recommending that the role of executive director of the Permitting Council — the federal agency responsible for coordinating environmental reviews for high-priority projects — be given to a presidential appointee with expanded powers to influence the approval process.

Increased risk of legal delays

The legal vulnerability of approvals issued without solid technical expertise could paralyze numerous energy projects. A study by the Breakthrough Institute reveals that NEPA-related lawsuits delayed projects by an average of 3.9 years between 2013 and 2022, whether they were fossil fuel or renewable energy projects. Without a strong framework to address legal challenges, these delays could worsen under a Trump administration implementing Schedule F.

Christine Tezak, director at ClearView Energy Partners, suggests that projects already under construction are likely safe from political interference, but new projects could be more vulnerable. If environmental reviews are seen as less rigorous, opponents of these projects will have more grounds to challenge them in court.

A risky bet for the future of energy projects

Ultimately, Trump’s desire to streamline energy project approvals may face unforeseen obstacles. By reducing the role of technical experts within the administration, many projects could become entangled in legal disputes. Without legislative reforms to limit legal challenges, particularly those related to NEPA, the risk is that this strategy, intended to speed up projects, could end up slowing them down even further.

The European Commission unveils a seven-point action plan aimed at lowering energy costs, targeting energy-intensive industries and households facing persistently high utility bills.
The European Commission plans to keep energy at the heart of its 2026 agenda, with several structural reforms targeting market security, governance and simplification.
The new Liberal Democratic Party (LDP)–Japan Innovation Party (Nippon Ishin no Kai) axis combines a nuclear restart, targeted fuel tax cuts and energy subsidies, with immediate effects on prices and risk reallocations for operators. —
German authorities have ruled out market abuse by major power producers during sharp price increases caused by low renewable output in late 2024.
A new International Energy Agency report urges Maputo to accelerate energy investment to ensure universal electricity access and support its emerging industry.
Increased reliance on combined-cycle plants after the April 28 blackout pushed gas use for electricity up by about 37%, bringing total demand to 267.6 TWh and strengthening flows to France.
The United States announces a tariff increase beyond the 10% base rate targeting several Colombian products. Bogotá has recalled its ambassador. The detailed list of tariff lines has not yet been published, while Colombia’s ban on coal exports to Israel remains in effect.
The president-elect outlines a pro-market agenda: gradual reform of fuel subsidies, review of Yacimientos de Litio Bolivianos (YLB) lithium contracts, and monetization of gas transit between Argentina and Brazil, prioritizing supply stabilization.
A three-year partnership has been signed between Senegal and two Quebec-based companies to develop the country’s geoscientific capacity and structure its energy sector through technological innovation.
The South African government plans 105,000 MW of additional capacity by 2039 to redefine its energy mix, support industrialisation, and strengthen supply security.
The Dutch government is initiating legislative reform to extend the Borssele nuclear plant until 2054 and has formalised the creation of a public entity to develop two new reactors.
The United Kingdom unveils a structured plan to double clean energy jobs, backed by over £50 billion ($61.04bn) in private investment and the creation of new training centres across industrial regions.
Vice President Kashim Shettima stated that Nigeria will need to invest more than $23bn to connect populations still without electricity, as part of a long-term energy objective.
EDF’s CEO said electricity prices will remain under control in 2026 as a new pricing system is set to replace the previous mechanism from January 1.
Talks on the Net-Zero Framework, which seeks to regulate greenhouse gas pricing on marine fuels, have been postponed until 2026 following a majority vote initiated by Saudi Arabia.
Enedis will progressively reorganise off-peak hour time slots from 1 November, impacting 14.5 million customers by 2027, under new rules set by the Energy Regulatory Commission.
A report highlights the financial burden of fossil imports during the energy crisis and points to electrification as key to European energy security.
Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu announced a review of public funding for renewable energy, without changing national targets, to avoid rent-seeking effects and better regulate the use of public funds.
The 2025 edition of the Renewable Electricity System Observatory warns of the widening gap between French energy ambitions and industrial reality, requiring immediate acceleration of investments in solar, wind and associated infrastructure.
Kogi State Electricity Distribution Limited reported a ₦1.3bn ($882,011) loss due to power fraud, threatening its operational viability in Kogi State.

All the latest energy news, all the time

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.