Trump’s plan to accelerate energy projects threatened by legal challenges

Trump's potential return to the "Schedule F" measure could ease energy project approvals but risks legal delays due to the replacement of technical experts with political appointees.

Share:

Former President Donald Trump’s ambition to streamline energy project approvals is centered on a controversial plan to overhaul the federal civil service. At the heart of this plan is the reinstatement of “Schedule F,” a measure introduced during his first term, which would allow the dismissal of thousands of federal employees and replace technical experts with political appointees, potentially impacting the permit review process, particularly under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).

Schedule F, a federal employment category introduced by a Trump executive order in October 2020, would strip traditional protections from career civil servants. The goal is to expedite decisions on major infrastructure projects, especially in the energy sector. However, federal permitting experts warn that this acceleration could lead to further delays, primarily due to potential legal challenges.

Technical expertise replaced by political appointees

Nikki Chiappa, director of the permitting program at the Breakthrough Institute, points out that replacing NEPA review specialists with politically appointed individuals who lack technical expertise could make environmental assessments more vulnerable to lawsuits. According to Chiappa, the quality of reviews could decline, making these projects more susceptible to prolonged legal delays.

The Schedule F program could also result in a loss of talent among federal experts, further increasing the workload for the few remaining specialists. This situation risks undermining the speed of approvals, a key objective of Trump’s strategy.

Impacts on renewable energy projects

While Trump has shown support for mining and fossil fuel projects, his frequent criticisms of renewable energy, particularly wind power, are well documented. Should Schedule F be reinstated, the appointment of politically aligned individuals could slow down green energy projects, including those backed by the Biden administration, such as offshore wind and solar initiatives.

The “Project 2025” report, authored by the Heritage Foundation, supports this approach by recommending that the role of executive director of the Permitting Council — the federal agency responsible for coordinating environmental reviews for high-priority projects — be given to a presidential appointee with expanded powers to influence the approval process.

Increased risk of legal delays

The legal vulnerability of approvals issued without solid technical expertise could paralyze numerous energy projects. A study by the Breakthrough Institute reveals that NEPA-related lawsuits delayed projects by an average of 3.9 years between 2013 and 2022, whether they were fossil fuel or renewable energy projects. Without a strong framework to address legal challenges, these delays could worsen under a Trump administration implementing Schedule F.

Christine Tezak, director at ClearView Energy Partners, suggests that projects already under construction are likely safe from political interference, but new projects could be more vulnerable. If environmental reviews are seen as less rigorous, opponents of these projects will have more grounds to challenge them in court.

A risky bet for the future of energy projects

Ultimately, Trump’s desire to streamline energy project approvals may face unforeseen obstacles. By reducing the role of technical experts within the administration, many projects could become entangled in legal disputes. Without legislative reforms to limit legal challenges, particularly those related to NEPA, the risk is that this strategy, intended to speed up projects, could end up slowing them down even further.

Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Colombia, Chile, and Peru significantly increase renewable electricity production, reaching nearly 70% of the regional electricity mix, according to a recent Wood Mackenzie study on Latin America's energy sector.
The Canadian government announces an investment of more than $40mn to fund 13 energy projects led by Indigenous communities across the country, aiming to improve energy efficiency and increase local renewable energy use.
The German Ministry of Economy plans to significantly expand aid aimed at reducing industrial electricity costs, increasing eligible companies from 350 to 2,200, at an estimated cost of €4bn ($4.7bn).
A major electricity blackout paralyzed large parts of the Czech Republic, interrupting transport and essential networks, raising immediate economic concerns, and highlighting the vulnerability of energy infrastructures to unforeseen technical incidents.
French greenhouse gas emissions are expected to rise by 0.2% in the first quarter of 2025, indicating a global slowdown in reductions forecast for the full year, according to Citepa, an independent organisation responsible for national monitoring.
The Republican budget bill passed by the U.S. Senate accelerates the phase-out of tax credits for renewable energies, favoring fossil fuels and raising economic concerns among solar and wind industry professionals.
Rapid growth in solar and wind capacities will lead to a significant rise in electricity curtailment in Brazil, as existing transmission infrastructure remains inadequate to handle this massive influx of energy, according to a recent study by consulting firm Wood Mackenzie.
In April 2025, fossil fuels represented 49.5% of South Korea's electricity mix, dropping below the symbolic threshold of 50% for the first time, primarily due to a historic decline in coal-generated electricity production.
The US Senate Finance Committee modifies the '45Z' tax credit to standardize the tax treatment of renewable fuels, thereby encouraging advanced biofuel production starting October 2025.
According to the 2025 report on global energy access, despite notable progress in renewable energy, insufficient targeted financing continues to hinder electricity and clean cooking access, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa.
While advanced economies maintain global energy leadership, China and the United States have significantly progressed in the security and sustainability of their energy systems, according to the World Economic Forum's annual report.
On the sidelines of the US–Africa summit in Luanda, Algiers and Luanda consolidate their energy collaboration to better exploit their oil, gas, and mining potential, targeting a common strategy in regional and international markets.
The UK's Climate Change Committee is urging the government to quickly reduce electricity costs to facilitate the adoption of heat pumps and electric vehicles, judged too slow to achieve the set climate targets.
The European Commission will extend until the end of 2030 an expanded state-aid framework, allowing capitals to fund low-carbon technologies and nuclear power to preserve competitiveness against China and the United States.
Japan's grid operator forecasts an energy shortfall of up to 89 GW by 2050 due to rising demand from semiconductor manufacturing, electric vehicles, and artificial intelligence technologies.
Energy-intensive European industries will be eligible for temporary state aid to mitigate high electricity prices, according to a new regulatory framework proposed by the European Commission under the "Clean Industrial Deal."
Mauritius seeks international investors to swiftly build a floating power plant of around 100 MW, aiming to secure the national energy supply by January 2026 and address current production shortfalls.
Madrid announces immediate energy storage measures while Lisbon secures its electrical grid, responding to the historic outage that affected the entire Iberian Peninsula in late April.
Indonesia has unveiled its new national energy plan, projecting an increase of 69.5 GW in electricity capacity over ten years, largely funded by independent producers, to address rapidly rising domestic demand.
French Minister Agnès Pannier-Runacher condemns the parliamentary moratorium on new renewable energy installations, warning of the potential loss of 150,000 industrial jobs and increased energy dependence on foreign countries.