Regulatory inconsistencies hold back carbon projects in Malaysia

Malaysia is struggling to harmonize its policies for the development of natural carbon projects, threatening their viability and reputation.

Share:

Inconsistencies Policies Carbon Projects

Despite its vast forest resources, Malaysia is making slow progress in developing natural carbon projects. Market players express concern about fragmented state policies that expose these projects to significant regulatory and reputational risks. Comprising 11 states to the west on the Malay Peninsula and two to the east on the island of Borneo, Federal Malaysia is developing national economic plans and legislative frameworks. However, for nature-based projects, state governments set local rules for land administration, forest management and agriculture.

Regulatory frameworks and carbon projects

Since 2021, the federal government has published non-binding general guidelines for the development of the voluntary carbon market, defining the types of projects feasible in the country, the stakeholders involved and the requirements for implementing and reporting emission reductions. Western states such as Terengganu, Johor and Kelantan plan to develop policies within the federal government framework. In contrast, Sarawak and Sabah in the east have formulated their own laws to accelerate project development. Proactive initiatives by the Sarawak and Sabah governments have effectively accelerated the development of nature-based projects in their territories. The Kuamut forest conservation project in Sabah, registered with Verra, has already started generating carbon credits. Meanwhile, the Marudi forest conservation project in Sarawak, also registered with Verra, is marked as “under development”. However, these initiatives have also created policy inconsistencies across the country, notably with regard to carbon licensing requirements, benefit-sharing conditions between stakeholders and governments, and measures to protect indigenous communities.

Different approaches by States

These inconsistencies, if not properly managed, could hamper the delivery of carbon credits and damage the reputation of buyers. Comparing the two pilot states, Sarawak has relatively detailed regulations in place, but the sophisticated rules also pose greater challenges and lengthen project development times. Sabah’s simpler regulations speed up projects, but leave grey areas that can trigger disputes. Sarawak is considered the most advanced among Malaysian states in terms of carbon policies, according to the VCM Handbook published in October 2023 by Bursa Malaysia, which hosts the national carbon exchange. Project proponents must first obtain a carbon study permit to conduct a feasibility study, then submit detailed plans for project implementation. Then they have to apply for a carbon license to start trading carbon credits. Sarawak has also listed the fees and royalties to be paid, and requires project developers to set aside part of the carbon credits to meet the state’s climate targets.

Effects of inconsistencies

A detailed regulatory framework, such as Sarawak’s, helps prevent disputes, but can slow down the process. On the other hand, the simplicity of Sabah’s regulations facilitates rapid implementation, but leaves uncertainties that can lead to disputes. Projects already in place in Sabah before all the regulations were established are seeing their carbon credits and returns on investment become uncertain, which poses a problem. Regulatory differences between Malaysian states pose challenges for project developers and investors. A local project developer pointed out that the existence of projects prior to the establishment of clear regulations makes the volume of tradable carbon credits and returns on investment uncertain.

Impact on aboriginal communities

Mitigating negative impacts on indigenous communities is another crucial challenge for the development of the Malaysian carbon market. Indigenous groups make up more than half the population of Sarawak and Sabah, with many living in forest reserves. Carbon projects have already been accused of violating indigenous rights. In December 2023, the UN Human Rights Council questioned the government of Sabah over an agreement with Singaporean company Hoch Standard, signed without the consent of indigenous communities, transferring the carbon rights of 2 million hectares of local forests.

Special cases and testimonials

A Save Rivers NGO report published in May 2024 criticizes the Jalin forest carbon management project in Sarawak, accusing the developers of forcing Penan communities to sign documents and denying them access to their forests. According to national guidelines, carbon project developers must consult affected indigenous stakeholders. At a webinar in May, Permian Malaysia, developer of the Kuamut pilot project in Sabah, claimed that their project areas are for commercial use only, with no indigenous communities. A SaraCarbon official indicated that they bypassed certain areas inhabited by indigenous people to develop the Marudi project. A Singapore-based carbon trader points out that foreign investors perceive Malaysian carbon credits as a whole, with no distinction between states. Any shortcomings therefore affect the overall image of Malaysian carbon credits. Another local project developer adds that credits would have to be earmarked to meet state climate targets, which could compromise the amount of credits available for trade.

Reputation and reliability of carbon credits

The reliability and reputation of Malaysian carbon credits depend on harmonized regulations and adequate protection of the rights of local communities. Investors need clear guarantees before committing to carbon projects in Malaysia. The sustainable development of these projects requires close collaboration between federal and state governments, as well as the active involvement of indigenous communities.
The development of natural carbon projects in Malaysia is hampered by inconsistent policies and risks for indigenous communities. To succeed, the country must harmonize its regulations and ensure adequate protection of the rights of local populations, while offering clear guarantees to investors.

Nearly USD92bn will be invested by major American and international groups in new data centres and energy infrastructure, responding to the surge in electricity demand linked to the rise of artificial intelligence.
Nouakchott has endured lengthy power interruptions for several weeks, highlighting the financial and technical limits of the Mauritanian Electricity Company as Mauritania aims to widen access and green its mix by 2030.
Between 2015 and 2024, four multilateral climate funds committed nearly eight bn USD to clean energy, attracting private capital through concessional terms while Africa and Asia absorbed more than half of the volume.
The Global Energy Policies Hub shows that strategic reserves, gas obligations, cybersecurity and critical-mineral policies are expanding rapidly, lifting oil coverage to 98 % of world imports.
According to a report by Ember, the Chinese government’s appliance trade-in campaign could double residential air-conditioner efficiency gains in 2025 and trim up to USD943mn from household electricity spending this year.
Washington is examining sectoral taxes on polysilicon and drones, two supply chains dominated by China, after triggering Section 232 to measure industrial dependency risks.
The 2025-2034 development plan presented by Terna includes strengthening Sicily’s grid, new interconnections, and major projects to support the region’s growing renewable energy capacity.
Terna and NPC Ukrenergo have concluded a three-year partnership in Rome aimed at strengthening the integration of the Ukrainian grid into the pan-European system, with an in-depth exchange of technological and regulatory expertise.
GE Vernova has secured a major contract to modernise the Kühmoos substation in Germany, enhancing grid reliability and integration capacity for power flows between Germany, France and Switzerland.
The National Energy System Operator forecasts electricity demand to rise to 785 TWh by 2050, underlining the need to modernise grids and integrate more clean energy to support the UK’s energy transition.
Terna has signed a guarantee agreement with SACE and the European Investment Bank to finance the Adriatic Link project, totalling approximately €1bn ($1.08bn) and validated as a major transaction under Italian regulations.
India unveils a series of reforms on oil and gas contracts, introducing a fiscal stability clause to enhance the sector’s attractiveness for foreign companies and boost its growth ambitions in upstream energy.
The European Commission is launching a special fund of EUR2.3bn ($2.5bn) to boost Ukraine’s reconstruction and attract private capital to the energy and infrastructure sectors.
Asia dominated global new renewable energy capacity in 2024 with 71% of installations, while Africa recorded limited growth of only 7.2%, according to the latest annual report from IRENA.
US President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act dramatically changes energy investment rules, imposing restrictions on renewables while favouring hydrocarbons, according to a recent report by consultancy firm Wood Mackenzie.
On July 8, 2025, the Senate validated the Gremillet bill, aimed at structuring France's energy transition with clear objectives for nuclear power, renewable energies, and energy renovation.
Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Colombia, Chile, and Peru significantly increase renewable electricity production, reaching nearly 70% of the regional electricity mix, according to a recent Wood Mackenzie study on Latin America's energy sector.
The Canadian government announces an investment of more than $40mn to fund 13 energy projects led by Indigenous communities across the country, aiming to improve energy efficiency and increase local renewable energy use.
The German Ministry of Economy plans to significantly expand aid aimed at reducing industrial electricity costs, increasing eligible companies from 350 to 2,200, at an estimated cost of €4bn ($4.7bn).
A major electricity blackout paralyzed large parts of the Czech Republic, interrupting transport and essential networks, raising immediate economic concerns, and highlighting the vulnerability of energy infrastructures to unforeseen technical incidents.