Regulatory inconsistencies hold back carbon projects in Malaysia

Malaysia is struggling to harmonize its policies for the development of natural carbon projects, threatening their viability and reputation.
Inconsistencies Policies Carbon Projects

Partagez:

Despite its vast forest resources, Malaysia is making slow progress in developing natural carbon projects. Market players express concern about fragmented state policies that expose these projects to significant regulatory and reputational risks. Comprising 11 states to the west on the Malay Peninsula and two to the east on the island of Borneo, Federal Malaysia is developing national economic plans and legislative frameworks. However, for nature-based projects, state governments set local rules for land administration, forest management and agriculture.

Regulatory frameworks and carbon projects

Since 2021, the federal government has published non-binding general guidelines for the development of the voluntary carbon market, defining the types of projects feasible in the country, the stakeholders involved and the requirements for implementing and reporting emission reductions. Western states such as Terengganu, Johor and Kelantan plan to develop policies within the federal government framework. In contrast, Sarawak and Sabah in the east have formulated their own laws to accelerate project development. Proactive initiatives by the Sarawak and Sabah governments have effectively accelerated the development of nature-based projects in their territories. The Kuamut forest conservation project in Sabah, registered with Verra, has already started generating carbon credits. Meanwhile, the Marudi forest conservation project in Sarawak, also registered with Verra, is marked as “under development”. However, these initiatives have also created policy inconsistencies across the country, notably with regard to carbon licensing requirements, benefit-sharing conditions between stakeholders and governments, and measures to protect indigenous communities.

Different approaches by States

These inconsistencies, if not properly managed, could hamper the delivery of carbon credits and damage the reputation of buyers. Comparing the two pilot states, Sarawak has relatively detailed regulations in place, but the sophisticated rules also pose greater challenges and lengthen project development times. Sabah’s simpler regulations speed up projects, but leave grey areas that can trigger disputes. Sarawak is considered the most advanced among Malaysian states in terms of carbon policies, according to the VCM Handbook published in October 2023 by Bursa Malaysia, which hosts the national carbon exchange. Project proponents must first obtain a carbon study permit to conduct a feasibility study, then submit detailed plans for project implementation. Then they have to apply for a carbon license to start trading carbon credits. Sarawak has also listed the fees and royalties to be paid, and requires project developers to set aside part of the carbon credits to meet the state’s climate targets.

Effects of inconsistencies

A detailed regulatory framework, such as Sarawak’s, helps prevent disputes, but can slow down the process. On the other hand, the simplicity of Sabah’s regulations facilitates rapid implementation, but leaves uncertainties that can lead to disputes. Projects already in place in Sabah before all the regulations were established are seeing their carbon credits and returns on investment become uncertain, which poses a problem. Regulatory differences between Malaysian states pose challenges for project developers and investors. A local project developer pointed out that the existence of projects prior to the establishment of clear regulations makes the volume of tradable carbon credits and returns on investment uncertain.

Impact on aboriginal communities

Mitigating negative impacts on indigenous communities is another crucial challenge for the development of the Malaysian carbon market. Indigenous groups make up more than half the population of Sarawak and Sabah, with many living in forest reserves. Carbon projects have already been accused of violating indigenous rights. In December 2023, the UN Human Rights Council questioned the government of Sabah over an agreement with Singaporean company Hoch Standard, signed without the consent of indigenous communities, transferring the carbon rights of 2 million hectares of local forests.

Special cases and testimonials

A Save Rivers NGO report published in May 2024 criticizes the Jalin forest carbon management project in Sarawak, accusing the developers of forcing Penan communities to sign documents and denying them access to their forests. According to national guidelines, carbon project developers must consult affected indigenous stakeholders. At a webinar in May, Permian Malaysia, developer of the Kuamut pilot project in Sabah, claimed that their project areas are for commercial use only, with no indigenous communities. A SaraCarbon official indicated that they bypassed certain areas inhabited by indigenous people to develop the Marudi project. A Singapore-based carbon trader points out that foreign investors perceive Malaysian carbon credits as a whole, with no distinction between states. Any shortcomings therefore affect the overall image of Malaysian carbon credits. Another local project developer adds that credits would have to be earmarked to meet state climate targets, which could compromise the amount of credits available for trade.

Reputation and reliability of carbon credits

The reliability and reputation of Malaysian carbon credits depend on harmonized regulations and adequate protection of the rights of local communities. Investors need clear guarantees before committing to carbon projects in Malaysia. The sustainable development of these projects requires close collaboration between federal and state governments, as well as the active involvement of indigenous communities.
The development of natural carbon projects in Malaysia is hampered by inconsistent policies and risks for indigenous communities. To succeed, the country must harmonize its regulations and ensure adequate protection of the rights of local populations, while offering clear guarantees to investors.

According to the 2025 report on global energy access, despite notable progress in renewable energy, insufficient targeted financing continues to hinder electricity and clean cooking access, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa.
While advanced economies maintain global energy leadership, China and the United States have significantly progressed in the security and sustainability of their energy systems, according to the World Economic Forum's annual report.
On the sidelines of the US–Africa summit in Luanda, Algiers and Luanda consolidate their energy collaboration to better exploit their oil, gas, and mining potential, targeting a common strategy in regional and international markets.
The UK's Climate Change Committee is urging the government to quickly reduce electricity costs to facilitate the adoption of heat pumps and electric vehicles, judged too slow to achieve the set climate targets.
The European Commission will extend until the end of 2030 an expanded state-aid framework, allowing capitals to fund low-carbon technologies and nuclear power to preserve competitiveness against China and the United States.
Japan's grid operator forecasts an energy shortfall of up to 89 GW by 2050 due to rising demand from semiconductor manufacturing, electric vehicles, and artificial intelligence technologies.
Energy-intensive European industries will be eligible for temporary state aid to mitigate high electricity prices, according to a new regulatory framework proposed by the European Commission under the "Clean Industrial Deal."
Mauritius seeks international investors to swiftly build a floating power plant of around 100 MW, aiming to secure the national energy supply by January 2026 and address current production shortfalls.
Madrid announces immediate energy storage measures while Lisbon secures its electrical grid, responding to the historic outage that affected the entire Iberian Peninsula in late April.
Indonesia has unveiled its new national energy plan, projecting an increase of 69.5 GW in electricity capacity over ten years, largely funded by independent producers, to address rapidly rising domestic demand.
French Minister Agnès Pannier-Runacher condemns the parliamentary moratorium on new renewable energy installations, warning of the potential loss of 150,000 industrial jobs and increased energy dependence on foreign countries.
The European battery regulation, fully effective from August 18, significantly alters industrial requirements related to electric cars and bicycles, imposing strict rules on recycling, supply chains, and transparency for companies.
The European Parliament calls on the Commission to strengthen energy infrastructure and accelerate the implementation of the Clean Industrial Deal to enhance the continent's energy flexibility and security amid increased market volatility.
The European Commission unveils an ambitious plan to modernize electricity grids and introduces the Clean Industrial Deal, mobilizing hundreds of billions of euros to strengthen the continent's industrial and energy autonomy.
In the United States, regulated electric grid operators hold a decisive advantage in connecting new data centres to the grid, now representing 134 GW of projects, according to a Wood Mackenzie report published on June 19.
The French National Assembly approves a specific target of 200 TWh renewable electricity production by 2030 within a legislative text extensively debated about the future national energy mix.
In 2024, US CO₂ emissions remain stable at 5.1bn tonnes, as the Trump administration prepares hydrocarbon-friendly energy policies, raising questions about the future evolution of the American market.
The early publication of France's energy decree triggers strong parliamentary reactions, as the government aims to rapidly secure investments in nuclear and other energy sectors.
Seven weeks after the major Iberian power outage, Spain identifies technical network failures, while the European Investment Bank approves major funding to strengthen the interconnection with France.
The European Union has announced a detailed schedule aiming to definitively halt Russian gas imports by the end of 2027, anticipating internal legal and commercial challenges to overcome.