Iran: Between economic openness and energy isolation

The Iranian presidential election pits Pezeshkian, who favors economic openness, against Jalili, who favors self-sufficiency. A crucial decision for the country's energy future.

Share:

Investissements énergie Iran

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

Annual subscription

8.25€/month*

*billed annually at 99€/year for the first year then 149,00€/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2€/month*
then 14.90€ per month thereafter

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles offered per month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 35,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

Iran is preparing to elect a new president, with two candidates with radically different visions for the future of the country’s energy industry. Masoud Pezeshkian, former Minister of Health, defends a strategy of economic openness and attracting foreign investment, while Saeed Jalili, former nuclear regulator, advocates a policy of self-sufficiency and economic resilience. This election will determine Iran’s energy trajectory for years to come.

Pezeshkian’s Pro-Investment strategy

Masoud Pezeshkian proposes resuming nuclear negotiations under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) to lift economic sanctions and attract foreign investment. According to Pezeshkian, Iran needs $250 billion in annual investment to modernize and increase the capacity of its oil industry. He believes that international cooperation is essential to achieve these goals.
Energy expert Hamid Hosseini maintains that Pezeshkian firmly believes in the importance of international interaction to revive the Iranian economy. Lifting sanctions would not only boost oil exports, but also improve the country’s overall economic situation by attracting the foreign capital needed to develop its energy infrastructure.

Jalili’s conservative approach

Saeed Jalili, for his part, is a fervent advocate of economic self-sufficiency. He proposes to build new domestic refineries to increase the added value of Iranian petroleum products. Jalili favors the use of internal financial resources to develop the upstream sector and increase oil production without relying on foreign investment.
Jalili is also known for wanting to strengthen relations with countries like Russia and China, and to reduce Iran’s dependence on US dollar transactions. Its strategy is based on increased resistance to international sanctions and maximum exploitation of internal resources to maintain and increase oil production.

Implications for the Energy Market

The election of either Pezeshkian or Jalili will have significant repercussions on the Iranian and global energy markets. Under Raisi’s presidency, Iran managed to increase its oil production despite sanctions, reaching 3.17 million barrels per day in May 2024. Nevertheless, the Iranian economy remains fragile, with high inflation and renewed US sanctions.
Pezeshkian’s vision for lifting sanctions and attracting foreign investment could stabilize and boost the Iranian economy. On the other hand, Jalili’s strategy of increasing self-sufficiency could limit opportunities for foreign investment, but would guarantee a degree of economic independence.

Economic outlook

Whoever wins the election, Iran will have to overcome many challenges to achieve its energy goals. The country will have to navigate between the need to lift sanctions to attract investment and the desire to maintain a degree of economic independence.
Iran’s energy policy will play a crucial role in the country’s economic future. With some of the world’s largest oil reserves, decisions taken in Tehran will have global repercussions. Investors and analysts will be watching developments closely, as they will influence not only the Iranian economy but also the dynamics of the international oil market.

Facing a structural electricity surplus, the government commits to releasing a new Multiannual Energy Programme by Christmas, as aligning supply, demand and investments becomes a key industrial and budgetary issue.
A key scientific report by the United Nations Environment Programme failed to gain state approval due to deep divisions over fossil fuels and other sensitive issues.
RTE warns of France’s delay in electrifying energy uses, a key step to limiting fossil fuel imports and supporting its reindustrialisation strategy.
India’s central authority has cancelled 6.3 GW of grid connections for renewable projects since 2022, marking a tightening of regulations and a shift in responsibility back to developers.
The Brazilian government has been instructed to define within two months a plan for the gradual reduction of fossil fuels, supported by a national energy transition fund financed by oil revenues.
The German government may miss the January 2026 deadline to transpose the RED III directive, creating uncertainty over biofuel mandates and disrupting markets.
Italy allocated 82% of the proposed solar and wind capacities in the Fer-X auction, totalling 8.6GW, with competitive purchase prices and a strong concentration of projects in the southern part of the country.
Amid rising public spending, the French government has tasked two experts with reassessing the support scheme for renewable electricity and storage, with proposals expected within three months.
National operator PSE partners with armed forces to protect transformer stations as critical infrastructure faces sabotage linked to foreign interference.
The Norwegian government establishes a commission to anticipate the decline of hydrocarbons and assess economic options for the country in the coming decades.
Kazakhstan plans to allocate 3 GW of wind and solar projects by the end of 2026 through public tenders, with a first 1 GW tranche in 2025, amid efforts to modernise its power system.
Hurricanes Beryl, Helene and Milton accounted for 80% of electricity outages recorded in 2024, marking a ten-year high according to federal data.
The French Energy Regulatory Commission introduces a temporary prudential control on gas and electricity suppliers through a “guichet à blanc” opening in December, pending the transposition of European rules.
The Carney–Smith agreement launches a new pipeline to Asia, removes oil and gas emission caps, and initiates reform of the Pacific north coast tanker ban.
The gradual exit from CfD contracts is turning stable assets into infrastructures exposed to higher volatility, challenging expected returns and traditional financing models for the renewable sector.
The Canadian government introduces major legislative changes to the Energy Efficiency Act to support its national strategy and adapt to the realities of digital commerce.
Quebec becomes the only Canadian province where a carbon price still applies directly to fuels, as Ottawa eliminated the public-facing carbon tax in April 2025.
New Delhi launches a 72.8 bn INR incentive plan to build a 6,000-tonne domestic capacity for permanent magnets, amid rising Chinese export restrictions on critical components.
The rise of CfDs, PPAs and capacity mechanisms signals a structural shift: markets alone no longer cover 10–30-year financing needs, while spot prices have surged 400% in Europe since 2019.
Germany plans to finalise the €5.8bn ($6.34bn) purchase of a 25.1% stake in TenneT Germany to strengthen its control over critical national power grid infrastructure.

All the latest energy news, all the time

Annual subscription

8.25€/month*

*billed annually at 99€/year for the first year then 149,00€/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2€/month*
then 14.90€ per month thereafter

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.