Hungary and Slovakia jointly oppose European ban on Russian energy

Budapest and Bratislava jointly reject the European Commission's proposal to ban Russian energy supplies, highlighting significant economic risks and a direct threat to their energy security, days ahead of a key meeting.

Share:

Hungary and Slovakia have announced joint opposition to the European Commission’s proposal to entirely ban Russian energy imports into the European Union (EU). This stance precedes a crucial Foreign Affairs Council meeting scheduled in Brussels on June 23.

Unified stance against Brussels

The announcement was made by Hungarian Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade Peter Szijjarto following talks in Bratislava with his Slovak counterpart, Juraj Blanar. Both countries intend to present a unified position to EU representatives, fearing the ban could lead to significant increases in energy costs for Hungarian and Slovak households. Peter Szijjarto considers the proposal by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen as designed to favour Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

“Next week, at the EU Foreign Affairs Council, we will jointly stand firm to prevent Brussels from endangering Hungary’s and Slovakia’s energy security to please Kyiv,” Szijjarto said according to Hungarian news agency MTI.

Strategic energy dependence

The Hungarian minister indicated that Central Europe’s existing energy infrastructure remains heavily dependent on Russian supplies. Without these resources, he stated, it would be impossible in the short term to guarantee reliable energy supplies for several European countries. He pointed out that the European initiative seems driven by political rather than economic considerations, rendering the proposal unacceptable to Budapest as well as Bratislava.

On June 16, both countries had already blocked an EU Council statement supporting Brussels’ proposal. The European Commission’s plan foresees a complete ban on Russian energy imports by January 1, 2028, with short-term contracts for both liquefied natural gas (LNG) and pipeline gas to be terminated by 2026.

Contested legal framework

To facilitate the adoption of this measure, Brussels has chosen to frame its initiative within trade policy rather than foreign policy, requiring qualified majority voting in the EU Trade Council. This strategic choice complicates efforts to block the measure, raising concerns among member states highly dependent on Russian energy sources.

Peter Szijjarto emphasised both countries’ determination not to accept that their citizens pay the price for such a decision: “We refuse to let the Hungarian people pay for the von der Leyen-Zelensky plan, and we will not allow Brussels to force Hungarian families to foot the bill for further support to Kyiv.”

Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Brazil adopts new rules allowing immediate commercial measures to counter the U.S. decision to impose an exceptional 50% customs tariff on all Brazilian exports, threatening stability in bilateral trade valued at billions of dollars.
Several international agencies have echoed warnings by Teresa Ribera, Vice-President of the European Commission, about commercial risks related to Chinese competition, emphasizing the EU's refusal to engage in a price war.
The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development lends €400 million to JSC Energocom to diversify Moldova's gas and electricity supply, historically dependent on Russian imports via Ukraine.
BRICS adopt a joint financial framework aimed at supporting emerging economies while criticizing European carbon border tax mechanisms, deemed discriminatory and risky for their strategic trade relations.