Europe faces the uncertainty of Russian gas transit via Ukraine

The imminent expiry of the gas transit agreement between Russia and Ukraine in 2024 could lead to major disruptions in energy supplies to several European countries, exacerbating current geopolitical tensions.

Share:

Pipeline en Ukraine

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

The gas transit agreement between Russia and Ukraine, signed in 2019, comes to an end in 2024.
This agreement has enabled Russia to transport up to 40 billion cubic meters (bcm) of gas a year through Ukrainian territory, supplying a large part of Europe. This infrastructure is crucial for countries such as Austria, Slovakia and Hungary, which remain partially dependent on Russian gas supplies.The gradual reduction in European dependence on Russian gas since 2022, in response to the invasion of Ukraine, has not completely eliminated the need for transit via Ukraine.
In 2023, 14.65 bcm of gas still passed through this strategic corridor.
Kiev, firmly opposed to extending the agreement, has already indicated that there will be no renewal, casting serious doubt on the continuity of gas flows beyond 2024.
The alternatives available to compensate for a possible cessation of transit via Ukraine are limited.
The TurkStream pipeline, linking Russia to Southern Europe via the Black Sea, does not have the capacity to fully replace current volumes.
Moreover, although the European Union has stepped up its efforts to diversify its sources of supply, notably with Azerbaijan via the Southern European Gas Corridor, these initiatives cannot quickly compensate for the possible loss of Ukrainian transit.
The financial impact for Gazprom would be significant if flows via Ukraine were to cease, with an estimated loss of revenue of $4.5 billion a year.
However, the stakes go far beyond economic considerations.
The end of the agreement could accentuate tensions between Russia, Ukraine and the countries of the European Union, increasing the risk of further disruption to energy markets.
European governments and industrial players alike must now anticipate these scenarios by strengthening their infrastructures and continuing to diversify energy sources.
These measures are essential to limit the risk of supply disruptions and to guarantee the continent’s long-term energy stability.

A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Brazil adopts new rules allowing immediate commercial measures to counter the U.S. decision to impose an exceptional 50% customs tariff on all Brazilian exports, threatening stability in bilateral trade valued at billions of dollars.
Consent Preferences