Energy transition: JETP challenges in developing countries

JETP, a G7-backed initiative, promises to finance the energy transition of developing nations. However, financing delays and structural obstacles are holding back the achievement of climate goals in countries such as South Africa, Indonesia, Vietnam and Senegal.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

The Just Energy Transition Partnership (JETP) is an international financing program designed to accelerate the energy transition in developing countries. It aims to reduce carbon emissions and promote the adoption of renewable energies.
Supported primarily by the G7 countries, as well as other donors, JETP aims to assist countries heavily dependent on coal in their decarbonization process.
Beneficiary countries, such as South Africa, Indonesia, Vietnam and Senegal, face major challenges in meeting their climate commitments, despite promised funding.

South Africa: a pioneer faces power cuts

South Africa was the first country to sign a JETP agreement in 2021, benefiting from $8.5 billion in funding.
The main objective is to limit annual CO2 emissions to between 350 and 375 million tonnes by 2030.
This cap, enshrined in the Paris Agreement, is crucial to reducing dependence on fossil fuels, particularly coal, which accounts for over 80% of the country’s energy mix.
However, the achievement of these targets is jeopardized by a persistent electricity crisis.
Recurrent power cuts are forcing the authorities to review their priorities.
In July 2024, a South African minister declared that resolving power cuts is now the priority, delaying the original timetable for decommissioning coal-fired power plants.
The majority of JETP funding is earmarked for clean electricity projects, but the country is struggling to reconcile its immediate energy needs with its long-term climate commitments.

Indonesia: ambitions limited by slow financial release

With a financing commitment of $20 billion in 2022, Indonesia is the largest beneficiary of JETP.
The plan aims to reduce CO2 emissions from 300 million tonnes to 250 million tonnes by 2030 for the grid-connected energy sector, while increasing the share of renewables in the energy mix from 12% in 2022 to 44% by 2030.
However, disbursements remained limited to $144.6 million by mid-2024, mostly in the form of grants and technical assistance.
Private funding, which is intended to complement the public funding provided by G7 donors, has yet to be fully mobilized.
One notable project supported by the United States has allocated $126 million to geothermal energy, a key resource for Indonesia.
Nevertheless, the country’s dependence on coal, which still provides over 60% of the country’s electricity, makes the gradual phase-out of this fossil fuel a complex undertaking.

Vietnam: earlier climate targets

In December 2022, Vietnam signed a JETP agreement with funding of $15.5 billion.
The country aims to cap greenhouse gas emissions from its power sector at 170 million tonnes by 2030, five years ahead of schedule.
In the longer term, it aims to reduce these emissions to 101 million tonnes by 2050, an ambitious target given the country’s rapid economic growth.
To achieve this, Vietnam is limiting the expansion of its installed coal-fired power plant capacity to 30.13 gigawatts by 2030, from 25.3 GW in 2022.
The country has identified over 220 renewable energy investment projects and is working with 60 groups to mobilize the necessary funds.
Investment is focused primarily on solar and wind power, given the country’s strong potential in both sectors.

Senegal: on the road to cleaner energy

In June 2023, Senegal became the fourth country to sign a JETP agreement, benefiting from a 2.5 billion euro financing pledge led by European Union countries.
The aim is to increase the share of renewable energies to 40% of the country’s energy mix by 2030, up from 29% in 2022.
Unlike other JETP beneficiary countries, Senegal is focusing less on an immediate exit from coal, and more on accelerating the adoption of renewable energies, particularly solar power.
Senegal and its international partners must publish a detailed investment plan by the end of 2024.
Although the development of the country’s energy transition is slower, its smaller size and growing energy sector offer promising prospects for a rapid transition.

JETP challenges and prospects

Although JETP is a laudable initiative, there are a number of obstacles to its effective implementation.
Firstly, delays in mobilizing funds, as observed in Indonesia and Vietnam, slow the progress of renewable energy projects.
In addition, the historical dependence of many countries on coal complicates their transition to a low-carbon energy mix.
Technological capacity is also a major challenge, as existing electricity infrastructures are not always adapted to the intermittent nature of renewable energies.
At the same time, developing countries need to ensure that the energy transition does not compromise their energy security, particularly as they face growing demand for electricity.
JETP countries such as South Africa, Indonesia, Vietnam and Senegal are showing signs of progress, but they will need to meet these challenges with continued support from international donors and increased mobilization of private finance to achieve their climate goals on time.

The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Brazil adopts new rules allowing immediate commercial measures to counter the U.S. decision to impose an exceptional 50% customs tariff on all Brazilian exports, threatening stability in bilateral trade valued at billions of dollars.
Several international agencies have echoed warnings by Teresa Ribera, Vice-President of the European Commission, about commercial risks related to Chinese competition, emphasizing the EU's refusal to engage in a price war.