Dozens of scientists denounce climate report deemed biased by US Department of Energy

A group of 85 researchers challenges the scientific validity of the climate report released by the US Department of Energy, citing partial methods and the absence of independent peer review.

Share:

Gain full professional access to energynews.pro from 4.90$/month.
Designed for decision-makers, with no long-term commitment.

Over 30,000 articles published since 2021.
150 new market analyses every week to decode global energy trends.

Monthly Digital PRO PASS

Immediate Access
4.90$/month*

No commitment – cancel anytime, activation in 2 minutes.

*Special launch offer: 1st month at the indicated price, then 14.90 $/month, no long-term commitment.

Annual Digital PRO Pass

Full Annual Access
99$/year*

To access all of energynews.pro without any limits

*Introductory annual price for year one, automatically renewed at 149.00 $/year from the second year.

A group of 85 scientists has formally criticised the climate assessment published by the US Department of Energy, arguing that the report does not meet basic standards of scientific integrity. This response, submitted to the US administration by the deadline for public comments, comes amid efforts to roll back federal environmental regulations.

Authors selected without scientific plurality

The original report, drafted by five researchers chosen by Energy Secretary Chris Wright, has been accused of failing to reflect the current state of climate knowledge. The scientists who signed the counter-review, led by Andrew Dessler of Texas A&M University and Robert Kopp of Rutgers University, stated that the working group members were selected to support a specific political line, without considering a diversity of scientific viewpoints.

The signatories also claimed that the Department of Energy’s report relied on discredited research, misinterpreted other publications, and lacked any peer-review process, contrary to standard practices in scientific publishing.

Procedures diverging from international standards

By comparison, reports from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the US National Climate Assessment involve thousands of contributors and undergo multiple rounds of independent review. These works are generally regarded as the institutional benchmarks for climate knowledge.

The contested report was published in July, accompanied by a statement from Secretary Chris Wright, who said he aimed to encourage broader debate on the climate issue. He added that the report’s conclusions differed from the “dominant narrative” and, in his view, reflected the “real state” of climate science today.

A report aligned with political objectives

For the scientists opposing this document, it is not an objective synthesis but rather a tool intended to support predetermined policy decisions. Researcher Andra Garner, who contributed to the review, argued that the report “privileges outdated individual opinions over scientific consensus.”

On the eve of the closing of the public comment period, the Department of Energy had already received more than 2,000 responses on the document. No official timetable has been announced for a possible revision or final validation of the report.

The Australian government has announced a new climate target backed by a funding plan, while maintaining its position as a major coal exporter, raising questions about its long-term energy strategy.
New 15-year agreement for the exploration of polymetallic sulphides in the Indian Ocean, making India the first country with two licences and the largest allocated perimeter for these deposits.
The Argentine government launches a national and international tender to sell 44% of Nucleo Electrica SA, continuing its policy of economic withdrawal through capital markets.
A report by Rhodium Group anticipates stagnation in US emissions, a result of the political shift favouring fossil fuels since Donald Trump returned to office.
A sudden fault on the national grid cut electricity supply to several regions of Nigeria, reigniting concerns about the stability of the transmission system.
Re-elected president Irfaan Ali announces stricter production-sharing agreements to increase national economic returns.
Coal India issues tenders to develop 5 GW of renewable capacity, split between solar and wind, as part of its long-term energy strategy.
US utilities anticipate a rapid increase in high-intensity loads, targeting 147 GW of new capacity by 2035, with a strategic shift toward deregulated markets.
France opens a national consultation on RTE’s plan to invest €100 billion by 2040 to modernise the high-voltage electricity transmission grid.
Governor Gavin Newsom orders state agencies to fast-track clean energy projects to capture Inflation Reduction Act credits before deadlines expire.
Germany’s energy transition could cost up to €5.4tn ($6.3tn) by 2049, according to the main industry organisation, raising concerns over national competitiveness.
Facing blackouts imposed by the authorities, small businesses in Iran record mounting losses amid drought, fuel shortages and pressure on the national power grid.
Russian group T Plus plans to stabilise its electricity output at 57.6 TWh in 2025, despite a decline recorded in the first half of the year, according to Chief Executive Officer Pavel Snikkars.
In France, the Commission de régulation de l’énergie issues a clarification on ten statements shared over the summer, correcting several figures regarding tariffs, production and investments in the electricity sector.
Five energy infrastructure projects have been added to the list of cross-border renewable projects, making them eligible for financial support under the CEF Energy programme.
The Tanzanian government launches a national consultation to accelerate the rollout of compressed natural gas, mobilising public and private financing to secure energy supply and lower fuel costs.
The Kuwaiti government has invited three international consortia to submit bids for the first phase of the Al Khairan project, combining power generation and desalination.
Nigeria’s state-owned oil company abandons plans to sell the Port Harcourt refinery and confirms a maintenance programme despite high operating costs.
The publication of the Multiannual Energy Programme decree, awaited for two years, is compromised by internal political tensions, jeopardising strategic investments in nuclear and renewables.
The US Energy Information Administration reschedules or cancels several publications, affecting the availability of critical data for oil, gas and renewables markets.

Log in to read this article

You'll also have access to a selection of our best content.