Carbon Neutral 2050: IEA’s Shock Scenario

Carbon neutrality in 2050 implies colossal carbon emission reduction targets in order to comply with the Paris Agreement.|Carbon neutrality in 2050 implies colossal carbon emission reduction targets in order to comply with the Paris Agreement.

Share:

neutralité carbone 2050

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

Carbon neutrality in 2050 implies colossal carbon emission reduction targets to comply with the Paris Agreement. In its latest scenario, Net Zero by 2050, A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector, the IEA describes the way forward for such an ecological transition. The practical question is: how can we achieve carbon neutrality?

The need for Carbon Neutrality in 2050

By unveiling its scenario for carbon neutrality in 2050, theInternational Energy Agency (IEA) has caused a veritable earthquake in the energy world. The agency is widely perceived as the world’s leading authority on energy forecasting. In many respects, the scenario is intended to be as realistic as possible, given the uncertainties surrounding the energy transition.

On the one hand, the IEA takes into account the specific circumstances of each country’s energy mix. This means that the scenario incorporates the fundamental divergences that exist in terms of national low-carbon strategy. Added to this is the requirement for universal access to energy by 2030, in line with the UN’s sustainable development goals. Finally, the scenario limits the expansion of carbon capture and storage technologies (CCUS) to and the use of carbon sinks as emission reduction strategies.

carbon capture system
Carbon capture system.

A call for greater ambition

With this degree of realism, the IEA wishes to call on governments to be more ambitious. Of course, the goal of carbon neutrality has been adopted in Europe and the United States by 2050, and in China by 2060. Nevertheless, greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise, exacerbating the devastating effects of global warming.

The IEA estimates that, despite announcements of carbon-neutral economies, temperatures will rise by 2.1°C by the end of the century. In other words, carbon neutrality in the United States, Europe and China will not be enough to comply with theParis Agreement. Other emerging countries such as India and Indonesia will also have to contribute to the effort against climate change.

Renewable energies dominate the energy mix

Achieving carbon neutrality by 2050 will require a gigantic effort to expand the use of renewable energies in the energy mix. According to the IEA, investment will need to reach nearly $5,000 billion a year, or 6% of global GDP. By 2040, electricity will have to be decarbonized, with a 4-fold increase in installed solar and wind power capacity worldwide.

100% electric vehicles by 2035

In terms of transport, electric vehicles should account for 100% of sales by 2035. This has led to a strong push for innovation in batteries, improving the long-term performance of electric mobility. At industrial level, decarbonization can only be achieved with technologies that are not yet mature, such as CCUS andhydrogen. The IEA is therefore calling for greater public support for these technologies, which are essential for reducing CO2 emissions.

Stop investing in fossil fuels as of 2022

This surge in renewable energies must be accompanied by a gradual shift away from fossil fuels in the energy mix. As a result, energies with a high carbon footprint should now account for only 1/5th of energy consumption, compared with 4/5th today. For the IEA, this is a Copernican revolution, having long defended fossil fuels in the past.

By 2050, this means a 90% reduction in coal consumption and a 75% reduction in oil consumption. Even gas, the fossil fuel with the most favorable carbon footprint, has seen its consumption fall by 55%. To achieve carbon neutrality, the IEA believes it is necessary to stop investing in fossil fuels today.

A new geopolitics of energy

Carbon neutrality in 2050 could thus revolutionize the world’s energy landscape towards a low-carbon energy mix. Beyond the simple question of energy, this transformation could have major geopolitical effects. Indeed, the energy transition is not without creating new areas of conflict between countries.

This will raise the question of supplies of critical materials, with the risk of conflict over these resources. Remember that 60% of the cobalt used to make batteries, for example, is extracted in the DRC. Another area of conflict concerns countries whose political and social stability depends on hydrocarbon exports. A transformation of their development model is therefore essential to ensure long-term stability.

carbon neutrality

The need for international cooperation

With this in mind, the IEA believes that a cooperative approach is essential to facilitate the energy transition in developing countries. North/South technology transfers should be encouraged to make low-carbon technologies competitive in these countries. There is also the question of financing, given the very high cost of capital in developing countries. In particular, rich countries will have to keep their promise of 100 billion in annual investments under the Green Fund.

For the time being, however, these two aspects of international cooperation are seriously hampered by national policies. As a result, technology transfers are underdeveloped, due to fears about emerging countries’ technological catch-up. For the Green Fund, its financial envelope barely reaches 10% of the planned amounts.

14 million jobs by 2030

Yet a more cooperative approach could generate huge economic benefits while protecting the planet from climate change. According to the IEA, nearly 14 million jobs worldwide could be created by 2030 in a carbon-neutral scenario. Including the 5 million jobs lost in fossil fuels, this creates a net gain of 9 million jobs. In fact, the IEA reminds us that carbon neutrality by 2050 could represent a formidable lever for long-term growth.

Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Consent Preferences